Who is Rossi`s successor?

Who is Rossi`s successor?

Author
Discussion

curlie467

Original Poster:

7,650 posts

208 months

Friday 19th October 2007
quotequote all
I genuinely thought that when Pedrosa came to the motogp class that he would be rossi`s main threat and the one to steal his reign. I knew Stoner was rapid but thought he would crash at crucial times, god how wrong can you be, the man has been awesome this year. A true champions performance (+ one hell of a bike!).

The question is this, Can he keep it up or will pedrosa and honda come good?

Basing this on the fact that the yamaha is a pup and not the fact that they are better than rossi, I still think he is the best in the business.

Conian

8,030 posts

208 months

Friday 19th October 2007
quotequote all
Hey good question.

Rossi's value comes in his ability to ride nearly any bike as well as can be in any circumstance, he seems to feel things very well and adapt to suit it.

Stoner is incredibly fast, but we need some more time to see if he is a better version of Barros (unbeatable IF the bike is exactly how he needs it) or a Rossi.

I think Rossi's adaptability and pure enjoyment of what he does will make him very hard to replace.

So ...er... to answer your question.. I dunno.. sorry frown

curlie467

Original Poster:

7,650 posts

208 months

Friday 19th October 2007
quotequote all


Indeed, well said, he is very adaptable, maybe yamaha will get off there backsides and pull something out of the hat but it would have to be good to beat the ducati.

I should have put this in general motorsport, can one of the mods move it for me please?

Edited by curlie467 on Friday 19th October 12:22

996 sps

6,165 posts

223 months

Sunday 21st October 2007
quotequote all


Stoner is incredibly fast, but we need some more time to see if he is a better version of Barros (unbeatable IF the bike is exactly how he needs it) or a Rossi.

I think Rossi's adaptability and pure enjoyment of what he does will make him very hard to replace.

So ...er... to answer your question.. I dunno.. sorry frown
[/quote]

Barros never won a world championship, don't think you can compare him to Stoner.

My opinion is Stoner will always be there or there abouts now. Its not like Hayden where you knew he would not win many races.

curlie467

Original Poster:

7,650 posts

208 months

Sunday 21st October 2007
quotequote all
I know, comparing him to barros is bizarre, barros has only won seven races in motogp through a hell of a lot of years, pure experience keeps him going now. Stoner has won 10 and counting in one season, only a limited handful of riders have done that.
I think stoner is the real deal, hayden just did it through pure consistency and everyone elses bad luck (not that hes rubbish, cause he isnt).
I also dont think yamaha can get that heap of junk any better.

Conian

8,030 posts

208 months

Sunday 21st October 2007
quotequote all
I wasnt comparing him to Barros you donkeys.......

Barros is a rider who needs things to be perfect to do well

at the other end of the spectrum.......

Rossi can ride almost anything to the best of it's ability.

This year, Stoner has has a good bike, with good tires, and has blitzed everyone.
Could he do the same if the bike was a bit shonky? Would he be fighting the bike to get it home in 2nd.... or getting passed by lots of people?

We have seen him drop back a bit when his tires have been bad, but did he choose to ease off and score some easy points, or was he not good enough to get the bike home on dodgy tires like Rossi would?

tim2100

6,287 posts

264 months

Monday 22nd October 2007
quotequote all
Would be interesting to see what happens if the tyres are taken out of the equation.

Would stoner still be as dominant on the ducati? or would Pedrosa & Rossi be there.

Rossi is a cut above most other riders, look at where the other Yamaha's are.
A shame toseland has gone to MotoGP for 2008. Edwards & Him will be at the back for 2008.


Conian

8,030 posts

208 months

Monday 22nd October 2007
quotequote all
tim2100 said:
Would be interesting to see what happens if the tyres are taken out of the equation.

Would stoner still be as dominant on the ducati? or would Pedrosa & Rossi be there.

Rossi is a cut above most other riders, look at where the other Yamaha's are.
A shame toseland has gone to MotoGP for 2008. Edwards & Him will be at the back for 2008.
I think they'd all just clatter along on their rims until so many people fell off it was deemed unsafe wink Corner speeds would be well down.

tim2100

6,287 posts

264 months

Monday 22nd October 2007
quotequote all
Conian said:
tim2100 said:
Would be interesting to see what happens if the tyres are taken out of the equation.

Would stoner still be as dominant on the ducati? or would Pedrosa & Rossi be there.

Rossi is a cut above most other riders, look at where the other Yamaha's are.
A shame toseland has gone to MotoGP for 2008. Edwards & Him will be at the back for 2008.
I think they'd all just clatter along on their rims until so many people fell off it was deemed unsafe wink Corner speeds would be well down.
LOL hehe

Edited by tim2100 on Monday 22 October 11:34

curlie467

Original Poster:

7,650 posts

208 months

Monday 22nd October 2007
quotequote all
Conian said:
I wasnt comparing him to Barros you donkeys.......

Barros is a rider who needs things to be perfect to do well

at the other end of the spectrum.......

Rossi can ride almost anything to the best of it's ability.

This year, Stoner has has a good bike, with good tires, and has blitzed everyone.
Could he do the same if the bike was a bit shonky? Would he be fighting the bike to get it home in 2nd.... or getting passed by lots of people?

We have seen him drop back a bit when his tires have been bad, but did he choose to ease off and score some easy points, or was he not good enough to get the bike home on dodgy tires like Rossi would?
Sorry dude, youre right though, hopefully we will find out next year, i hope he isnt a fl;ash in the pan as its good for the sport to have a few up there fighting for wins.