The Ashes

Author
Discussion

shnozz

Original Poster:

27,895 posts

277 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
anyone else stupid enough to be spending half the night watching? Or will it just be me asleep at my desk tomorrow?

pombstard

7,046 posts

248 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
I've got the BBC open on my desktop, and am partaking in a variety of sledging around the office - cracking fun. Some of the t-shirts at www.cricket365.com have made for great e-mail responses.

chilli

17,320 posts

242 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
Don't even know the rules....Who's winning?

VETTE_1978

3,247 posts

228 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
ZZzzzzzz....

Was up till 3am, dozed for a few hours with an alarm at 5am and 6:45am to keep me in the game.

Even with no beer I now have a craving for a big fry-up and not the sole banana on my desk!

Same again tonight me thinks.

Nuggs

4,640 posts

240 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
Aus 346/3 and the papers are (typically) running headlines like "Pontin Flays England" and "Brittle England". That's before our chaps even go into bat. If it's a decent batting wicket, then who knows what could happen?

Okay, the Aussies are likely to lose the match with a score like that, but it certainly doesn't mean that the entire series is lost, as some may suggestrolleyes

wolves_wanderer

12,555 posts

243 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
Nuggs said:
Aus 346/3 and the papers are (typically) running headlines like "Pontin Flays England" and "Brittle England". That's before our chaps even go into bat. If it's a decent batting wicket, then who knows what could happen?

Okay, the Aussies are likely to lose the match with a score like that, but it certainly doesn't mean that the entire series is lost, as some may suggestrolleyes
Aussies have only got 2 hobbies: Talking about how great they are and telling every fcensoredr else how great they are.

Harmy was a bit crap though

johnfm

13,668 posts

256 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
wolves_wanderer said:
Nuggs said:
Aus 346/3 and the papers are (typically) running headlines like "Pontin Flays England" and "Brittle England". That's before our chaps even go into bat. If it's a decent batting wicket, then who knows what could happen?

Okay, the Aussies are likely to lose the match with a score like that, but it certainly doesn't mean that the entire series is lost, as some may suggestrolleyes
Aussies have only got 2 hobbies: Talking about how great they are and telling every fcensoredr else how great they are.

Harmy was a bit crap though


Though most of the time we just point to the scoreboard and let the results do the talking.....

maddog993

1,220 posts

246 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
Can't believe they went with Giles & Jones over Panesar & Read - two statistical makeweights over two players of real ability. It conveys a real conservative, negative attitude that psychologically plays into Aussie hands IMHO.
Also if Harmy's injured - I'd say we're pretty much f*cked- Freddy can't take the Aussie heads off on his own.

DJc

23,563 posts

242 months

Thursday 23rd November 2006
quotequote all
www.tmsbtaverners.org

The best cricket lovers website and forum around!

Oh and the Ashes Im depressed already. I watched the first 5 overs and turned the tv off, safe in the knowledge we were fubar'd. I nipped for a drink around 2-3am ish and was pleasently suprised to see them at 142-2 and I thought OK, so its roughly equal with the Aussies just having their noses in front. 150-3 would have been dead on and 150-4 would have put us in front. You always have to remember the old cricket philosophy of looking at any score with a further loss of 2 more wickets. Unfortunately I then put the tv back on at 7am and saw the score. I have to say I wasnt massively suprised.

Harmy's first ball is going to go down in Ashes history.