Discussion
Alberto Salazar his coach gets banned for doping offences and Mo is now off the pace.
Coincedence. I think not
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/oct/01/athl...
Coincedence. I think not
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/oct/01/athl...
sherman said:
Alberto Salazar his coach gets banned for doping offences and Mo is now off the pace.
Coincedence. I think not
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/oct/01/athl...
Probably this. Cheating little toad. He's a disgrace, absolute joke he is idolised as he is. Watching him st his pants or squirm at the tough questions that journo's ask is hilarious. Coincedence. I think not
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/oct/01/athl...
imperium said:
Agreed, but no different to all other top athletes.
Well, it is in that his sport almost entirely depends on aerobic capability, there's no skill in it, so while I agree rugby and football and tennis will be full of drugs, at least there is a huge amount of skill involved too.okgo said:
sherman said:
Alberto Salazar his coach gets banned for doping offences and Mo is now off the pace.
Coincedence. I think not
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/oct/01/athl...
Probably this. Cheating little toad. He's a disgrace, absolute joke he is idolised as he is. Watching him st his pants or squirm at the tough questions that journo's ask is hilarious. Coincedence. I think not
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/oct/01/athl...
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/766061205/nike-coac...
it doesn't indicate doping like what happened in Lance Armstrong's case, but more unintentional breaking in the rules.
Challo said:
Have you watch the documentary called Nike's Big Bet? Quite interesting background on Alberto and pushing the limits of athletes.
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/766061205/nike-coac...
it doesn't indicate doping like what happened in Lance Armstrong's case, but more unintentional breaking in the rules.
I think you'd have to be incredibly naive to think it wasn't something much more sinister than 'unintentional breaking of rules'. https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/766061205/nike-coac...
it doesn't indicate doping like what happened in Lance Armstrong's case, but more unintentional breaking in the rules.
okgo said:
Challo said:
Have you watch the documentary called Nike's Big Bet? Quite interesting background on Alberto and pushing the limits of athletes.
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/766061205/nike-coac...
it doesn't indicate doping like what happened in Lance Armstrong's case, but more unintentional breaking in the rules.
I think you'd have to be incredibly naive to think it wasn't something much more sinister than 'unintentional breaking of rules'. https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/766061205/nike-coac...
it doesn't indicate doping like what happened in Lance Armstrong's case, but more unintentional breaking in the rules.
Challo said:
Not naive at all, and I do think there is something more than meets the eye. Issue is that Mo Farah hasn't failed a test, and while we can speculate that he is a cheating bd you need to prove it.
In time my man, in time. 'hasn't failed a test' means fk.ALL. Go and watch Icarus.
Challo said:
Not naive at all, and I do think there is something more than meets the eye. Issue is that Mo Farah hasn't failed a test, and while we can speculate that he is a cheating bd you need to prove it.
The golden boy of US track and field, Carl Lewis "never failed a test" during his career. It transpired that he had at least two failed tests covered up before the Seoul Olympics. But that's OK because hundreds of other US athletes were getting away with it as well.https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2003/apr/24/athl...
andyA700 said:
Challo said:
Not naive at all, and I do think there is something more than meets the eye. Issue is that Mo Farah hasn't failed a test, and while we can speculate that he is a cheating bd you need to prove it.
The golden boy of US track and field, Carl Lewis "never failed a test" during his career. It transpired that he had at least two failed tests covered up before the Seoul Olympics. But that's OK because hundreds of other US athletes were getting away with it as well.https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2003/apr/24/athl...
okgo said:
Challo said:
Like i said you need to prove it. If its been covered up then it needs to be investigated and uncovered.
Go and watch Icarus. It might well give you an idea to why these things do not see the light of day. Farah has always had a cloud hanging over him due to the Nike connection. Has it changed peoples opinions, Nope? He will always be seen as a national hero, and will be until some proof comes out that he is a drugs cheat.
For me personally, I don't really care what people put in their bodies. Athletes will do whatever it takes to win. What annoys me is the lack of honesty that surrounds elite sports. But then we'd probably be disinterested in watching sports where people aren't enhanced, bad for business.
Athletes have ways around drug testing. Look at something like bodybuilding, massive ripped guys on a cocktail of substances, that pass the drug testing no problem. I assume if someone makes their living from their appearance, or physical capabilities, that they are enhanced. Why wouldn't they be.
Athletes have ways around drug testing. Look at something like bodybuilding, massive ripped guys on a cocktail of substances, that pass the drug testing no problem. I assume if someone makes their living from their appearance, or physical capabilities, that they are enhanced. Why wouldn't they be.
Gassing Station | Sports | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff