The Hundred Cricket

The Hundred Cricket

Author
Discussion

Tony Angelino

Original Poster:

1,978 posts

118 months

Thursday 3rd October 2019
quotequote all
Anybody following this?

Marketing seems pretty good to me, building up nicely.

A gimmick too far?

monarodom

1,287 posts

151 months

Thursday 3rd October 2019
quotequote all
Utter bks in my opinion.

We have a perfectly good T20 competition in this country. One that had record attendances this year. Attendances which have been increasing year on year for the last 7 or 8 years I believe! A simple solution would have been to sell a T20 Blast package to a terrestrial channel along with some ODI games and a test or two. Work with Sky for the latter.

Instead we have a format played by nobody else. We have 5 or 10 ball 'overs' as they are simpler to understand. 100 balls as it is 'simpler'. We have non-playing players!!

To facilitate the competition, 4 day cricket will be shoved further into the beginning and end of the season, when we need to produce better quality test match players.

The 50 over competition will run alongside the hundred ball comp. However, it is effectively being downgraded to a 2nd XI tournament as a result, at a time when England are world champions.

There will be little county cricket during the school holidays. I believe the Blast will take place before them too, which will no doubt put attendances down so the ECB can point at a decline and say the Hundred is a great success. So surely kids can attend Hundred games instead? Well for many in the SW, SE & NE, you will end up spending more time travelling to a game than at it. It is infact taking access to the game away from these areas.

I cannot understand any of it. I for one will not be attending any games, or watching it. The only positive is having something which resembles cricket on TV. The names are garbage. The kits aren't much better either. Every centrally contracted player is too scared to speak out against their employer and you can't blame anyone else for securing their futures financially. Just such a shame it is for this steaming pile of ****.

The Hundred. An answer to a question nobody asked. Rant over.

Stan the Bat

9,155 posts

217 months

Thursday 3rd October 2019
quotequote all
Not needed.

Tony Angelino

Original Poster:

1,978 posts

118 months

Friday 4th October 2019
quotequote all
monarodom said:
Utter bks in my opinion.

We have a perfectly good T20 competition in this country. One that had record attendances this year. Attendances which have been increasing year on year for the last 7 or 8 years I believe! A simple solution would have been to sell a T20 Blast package to a terrestrial channel along with some ODI games and a test or two. Work with Sky for the latter.

Instead we have a format played by nobody else. We have 5 or 10 ball 'overs' as they are simpler to understand. 100 balls as it is 'simpler'. We have non-playing players!!

To facilitate the competition, 4 day cricket will be shoved further into the beginning and end of the season, when we need to produce better quality test match players.

The 50 over competition will run alongside the hundred ball comp. However, it is effectively being downgraded to a 2nd XI tournament as a result, at a time when England are world champions.

There will be little county cricket during the school holidays. I believe the Blast will take place before them too, which will no doubt put attendances down so the ECB can point at a decline and say the Hundred is a great success. So surely kids can attend Hundred games instead? Well for many in the SW, SE & NE, you will end up spending more time travelling to a game than at it. It is infact taking access to the game away from these areas.

I cannot understand any of it. I for one will not be attending any games, or watching it. The only positive is having something which resembles cricket on TV. The names are garbage. The kits aren't much better either. Every centrally contracted player is too scared to speak out against their employer and you can't blame anyone else for securing their futures financially. Just such a shame it is for this steaming pile of ****.

The Hundred. An answer to a question nobody asked. Rant over.
But apart from all that?

FredericRobinson

3,875 posts

237 months

Friday 4th October 2019
quotequote all
It's the biggest act of wilful self harm any sport has ever undertaken

warch

2,941 posts

159 months

Friday 4th October 2019
quotequote all
I'll probably end up enjoying it, but I can't see what it does that 20 20 doesn't already do.

Those team jim jams look pretty ghastly too, my local team shirt looks like a bag of crap popcorn.

FredericRobinson

3,875 posts

237 months

Friday 4th October 2019
quotequote all
What it does that 20 20 doesn't do is cost the cash reserves of the ECB to set up, kill 50 over cricket the year after England won the world cup and damage red ball cricket even further which can only have bad consequences for test cricket in the future, test cricket being the thing that funds the rest of the game in this country.
That, and it's target audience is people who don't like cricket.
Oh, they've ripped up women's cricket to accommodate it too, and it's based no where near where many of the most successful 2020 teams are from, and loads else besides

FredericRobinson

3,875 posts

237 months

Friday 4th October 2019
quotequote all
Oh yeah, the teams names are really st too, still it's not FOR me, me liking cricket and that

Black can man

31,908 posts

173 months

Sunday 6th October 2019
quotequote all
The Ovai Invincibles ?

Perlease just say South London FFS ,

Or Surrey for goodness sake