A question about the anaerobic threshold

A question about the anaerobic threshold

Author
Discussion

Kawasicki

Original Poster:

13,368 posts

240 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
Last year I did a fitness test. One result is a little confusing. My heart rate at my anaerobic threshold is 157bpm or so. How come I can run or ride my bike for hours at way above that heart rate? Is is simply that above 157bpm I am getting most of my energy from sugar rather than fat burning?

Scabutz

8,009 posts

85 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
If you can run or ride above your determined threshold then your threshold must have been calculated incorrectly. Yes in anaerobic state you are burning almost exclusively carbohydrates but lactate will be be building and you will not be able to sustain it for long.

If the test was last year its possible you have raised your threshold.

You should be able to sustain a decent effort at under your threshold but once you go over (way over you say) you be in the hurt locker and wont last long

popeyewhite

20,913 posts

125 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
A well trained athlete should be able to run for an hour at their (AT) lactate threshold. An easy test for you is strap on a heart monitor and run/cycle as fast as you can for 20 minutes then subtract 5% from your average heartrate. This should be near enough your lactate threshold hr. Think you'll find 157 a bit low smile

paulrockliffe

15,929 posts

232 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
How was your test done? If it's running then that's a threshold for running. Cycling should be higher because without the impact on your legs your bloodflow is higher in the leg muscles on a bike, so you clear lactic acid much better.

You can see this effect quite easily if you go to the track and do 10 x 200m flat-out and see how long it takes you to recover. Days. If you do the same on a bike, flat out for 30s, 10 times, you'll be fine by the time you get to the next hill.

Kawasicki

Original Poster:

13,368 posts

240 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
paulrockliffe said:
How was your test done? If it's running then that's a threshold for running. Cycling should be higher because without the impact on your legs your bloodflow is higher in the leg muscles on a bike, so you clear lactic acid much better.

You can see this effect quite easily if you go to the track and do 10 x 200m flat-out and see how long it takes you to recover. Days. If you do the same on a bike, flat out for 30s, 10 times, you'll be fine by the time you get to the next hill.
Test was done on my bike...last year I did a one hour time trial on the same bike, it was frigging horrible, average HR was 176 bpm and it only went up or down by 5 bpm during the hour, so there was no break in that time.

Kawasicki

Original Poster:

13,368 posts

240 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
A well trained athlete should be able to run for an hour at their (AT) lactate threshold. An easy test for you is strap on a heart monitor and run/cycle as fast as you can for 20 minutes then subtract 5% from your average heartrate. This should be near enough your lactate threshold hr. Think you'll find 157 a bit low smile
Thanks for taking an interest! One question though, can't I just ignore the pain and keep my heartrate at any point I like for 20 minutes? I agree that one HR will be faster than all the others though...but I would imagine that will be very close to my max HR. So what is the anaerobic threshold?

Not being a smart arse...I am just a bit confused.

popeyewhite

20,913 posts

125 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all

paulrockliffe said:
Cycling should be higher because without the impact on your legs your bloodflow is higher in the leg muscles on a bike, so you clear lactic acid much better.
Are you quite sure of that?


paulrockliffe said:
.You can see this effect quite easily if you go to the track and do 10 x 200m flat-out and see how long it takes you to recover. Days. If you do the same on a bike, flat out for 30s, 10 times, you'll be fine by the time you get to the next hill.
Running is a bodyweight exercise, cycling is not. Not surprising the same time test on a bike will be easier!

popeyewhite

20,913 posts

125 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
So what is the anaerobic threshold?
https://www.concept2.com/indoor-rowers/training/ti...

Kawasicki

Original Poster:

13,368 posts

240 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
Kawasicki said:
So what is the anaerobic threshold?
https://www.concept2.com/indoor-rowers/training/ti...
Thanks for the link...I get the logic..I just don't understand how it relates to my training/competition.

I was told to do a fitness test...I did one and now I am even more confused. How can my lab tested anaerobic threshold be 157bpm yet I can compete at fairly close to my max HR for a full hour?

Scabutz

8,009 posts

85 months

Tuesday 7th May 2019
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
popeyewhite said:
A well trained athlete should be able to run for an hour at their (AT) lactate threshold. An easy test for you is strap on a heart monitor and run/cycle as fast as you can for 20 minutes then subtract 5% from your average heartrate. This should be near enough your lactate threshold hr. Think you'll find 157 a bit low smile
Thanks for taking an interest! One question though, can't I just ignore the pain and keep my heartrate at any point I like for 20 minutes? I agree that one HR will be faster than all the others though...but I would imagine that will be very close to my max HR. So what is the anaerobic threshold?

Not being a smart arse...I am just a bit confused.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC34381...

Its the point just before the point that your breathing becomes extremely laboured. Once you go in to anaerobic state you will be breathing very heavily and your muscles will start to burn (usually) from the lacate. When you stop you will be breathing very heavily for awhile after while you pay back the debt.

Training below the threshold is a good way to increase that threshold. That's what a lot of endurance training is about, increasing the threshold.

Doing tests like 20 min all out and taking 95% of that are good at estimating it. Or you can use 85% of the MHR as a guide. The only proper way of getting it is with gas exchange or blood work. Having your ear or finger pricked for blood while you are destroying yourself should be fun eh?

If you can smash a 1 hour TT at 176, then there is no way your threshold is 157.

Exige46

318 posts

241 months

Wednesday 8th May 2019
quotequote all
Have you actually tested your maximum heart rate?

Kawasicki

Original Poster:

13,368 posts

240 months

Wednesday 8th May 2019
quotequote all
Yes. 5 years ago (age 40) I got 206...and I had moderate fitness. Since then I have been training fairly consistently and become much fitter, and it has been dropping 2 bpm per year, so around 196 now.

Exige46

318 posts

241 months

Thursday 9th May 2019
quotequote all
So being able to do 1h TT at 176bpm is pretty much your lactate threshold HR, which sounds about right if your max HR is 196. Don't know how the 157 was arrived at, but clearly wrong.

Kawasicki

Original Poster:

13,368 posts

240 months

Thursday 9th May 2019
quotequote all
Exige46 said:
So being able to do 1h TT at 176bpm is pretty much your lactate threshold HR, which sounds about right if your max HR is 196. Don't know how the 157 was arrived at, but clearly wrong.
Cheers, I suspect you are correct and the test result is wrong. The 157 was arrived at automatically by looking at the rate of lactate buildup.