bwin won't pay out on a winning bet!?

bwin won't pay out on a winning bet!?

Author
Discussion

WCZ

Original Poster:

10,737 posts

199 months

Tuesday 30th April 2013
quotequote all
This last weekend I bet £20 with bwin that Audley Harrison would get knocked out in the first round.

I choose bwin because I already had an existing account with them, though after i'd placed the bet I noticed there were several other bookies offering slightly better odds (one of which my brother chose).

After the fight had ended with him getting ko'd in 1, much to my delight. I saw the funds had came into my account and requested a withdrawal to my associated bank account there.

Two days later I checked to see if the funds had cleared and when logging into my bwin account noticed that my my initial stake (£20) was in my account and the bet had "cancelled" stated on it in my bet history!?

After contacting customer services who responded in the form of an email after 9 hours, they've told me that "we cancelled all the round by round bets afterwards because we realized we'd taken odds on it being a 12 round fight not a 10"

I'm not sure what to do now, this has really annoyed me and a quick googling around shows bwin have a history of coming up with lots of creative reasons why they won't pay out.

Surely this is illegal, what can I do?



D1ngd0ng

1,014 posts

170 months

Thursday 2nd May 2013
quotequote all
Bets are not legally enforceable, do bwin agree to abide by IBAS or some other gambling dispute body? If they do then take it to them.

Did you not notice that they'd priced up as 12 rounds instead of 10? Could argue that you'd have backed it whatever and they're potentially arguing the toss over tenths of a percent in terms of price differences but its bwin and I wouldn't bother wasting your time.

WCZ

Original Poster:

10,737 posts

199 months

Thursday 2nd May 2013
quotequote all
D1ngd0ng said:
Bets are not legally enforceable, do bwin agree to abide by IBAS or some other gambling dispute body? If they do then take it to them.

Did you not notice that they'd priced up as 12 rounds instead of 10? Could argue that you'd have backed it whatever and they're potentially arguing the toss over tenths of a percent in terms of price differences but its bwin and I wouldn't bother wasting your time.
I'm not sure whether they abide by IBAS, judging from other peoples experiences, no.

I didn't notice they'd priced it up as 12 rounds as the odds were similar with every other bookmaker (in some cases marginally better) and I added the bet onto my slip directly through an oddscomparison website link.

After lots of emails I have managed to get my money back anyway, which i'm happy about though I won't be using bwin ever again.

Justices

3,681 posts

169 months

Thursday 2nd May 2013
quotequote all
That's shocking behaviour. Much like insurance companies, when it's time to collect they are all smiles, when it's time to cough up they have every excuse in the book (and invent a few new ones). I had an issue with William Hill once, odds were 100-1 with a 1k stake. It took three days of back and fourth calls and emails from the other side of the world but they did eventually cough up. I won't give them credit for coughing up as that is what they are supposed to do. Closed my account with them as soo as the funds had transfered.

Sargeant Orange

2,787 posts

152 months

Friday 3rd May 2013
quotequote all
D1ngd0ng said:
Bets are not legally enforceable, do bwin agree to abide by IBAS or some other gambling dispute body? If they do then take it to them.

Did you not notice that they'd priced up as 12 rounds instead of 10? Could argue that you'd have backed it whatever and they're potentially arguing the toss over tenths of a percent in terms of price differences but its bwin and I wouldn't bother wasting your time.
Bets with UK based bookies are legally enforceable, however they are few and far between now with most basing themselves in Gibraltar or Malta for a multitude of dodgy reasons.

Pothole

34,367 posts

287 months

Friday 3rd May 2013
quotequote all
Sargeant Orange said:
Bets with UK based bookies are legally enforceable, however they are few and far between now with most basing themselves in Gibraltar or Malta for a multitude of dodgy reasons.
Do tell me about the multitude. A list will do.

WCZ

Original Poster:

10,737 posts

199 months

Friday 3rd May 2013
quotequote all
Justices said:
That's shocking behaviour. Much like insurance companies, when it's time to collect they are all smiles, when it's time to cough up they have every excuse in the book (and invent a few new ones). I had an issue with William Hill once, odds were 100-1 with a 1k stake. It took three days of back and fourth calls and emails from the other side of the world but they did eventually cough up. I won't give them credit for coughing up as that is what they are supposed to do. Closed my account with them as soo as the funds had transfered.
you won £100k? biggrin

There's a reported trend of some bookmakers closing accounts if people have a winning streak and making it very awkward to get your money back.

Bwin are based in Gibraltar.

Pothole

34,367 posts

287 months

Friday 3rd May 2013
quotequote all
WCZ said:
Justices said:
That's shocking behaviour. Much like insurance companies, when it's time to collect they are all smiles, when it's time to cough up they have every excuse in the book (and invent a few new ones). I had an issue with William Hill once, odds were 100-1 with a 1k stake. It took three days of back and fourth calls and emails from the other side of the world but they did eventually cough up. I won't give them credit for coughing up as that is what they are supposed to do. Closed my account with them as soo as the funds had transfered.
you won £100k? biggrin

There's a reported trend of some bookmakers closing accounts if people have a winning streak and making it very awkward to get your money back.

Bwin are based in Gibraltar.
Most, if not all, online bookies restrict accounts which win regularly or large...of course, wouldn't you?

WCZ

Original Poster:

10,737 posts

199 months

Friday 3rd May 2013
quotequote all
Pothole said:
ost, if not all, online bookies restrict accounts which win regularly or large...of course, wouldn't you?
large (£5k+) wins and cumulatively large wins, yes.
consistent wins in the sports market, no.

statistically there will always be someone who has a 'streak'

Pothole

34,367 posts

287 months

Friday 3rd May 2013
quotequote all
WCZ said:
Pothole said:
ost, if not all, online bookies restrict accounts which win regularly or large...of course, wouldn't you?
large (£5k+) wins and cumulatively large wins, yes.
consistent wins in the sports market, no.

statistically there will always be someone who has a 'streak'
meh. They prefer a blanket, easily applicable rule. Profits don't really suffer as there really is 'one born every minute'.

D1ngd0ng

1,014 posts

170 months

Wednesday 8th May 2013
quotequote all
Pothole said:
Sargeant Orange said:
Bets with UK based bookies are legally enforceable, however they are few and far between now with most basing themselves in Gibraltar or Malta for a multitude of dodgy reasons.
Do tell me about the multitude. A list will do.
Yes, do tell please. Which books? Laddies, hills, chandlers, stans?

Steameh

3,155 posts

215 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
I dont see how the length of the fight would have any impact whatsoever on him being sparked in the first round.

Pothole

34,367 posts

287 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
Which could be one reason why you're not running a successful bookmaking business.

Steameh

3,155 posts

215 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
Pothole said:
Which could be one reason why you're not running a successful bookmaking business.
One of many reasons no doubt.

fandango_c

1,942 posts

191 months

Saturday 11th May 2013
quotequote all
Pothole said:
Which could be one reason why you're not running a successful bookmaking business.
So why would the length of the fight have any impact on the fight finishing in the first round?

Juanco20

3,250 posts

198 months

Saturday 11th May 2013
quotequote all
fandango_c said:
So why would the length of the fight have any impact on the fight finishing in the first round?
I'm guessing two rounds less means less concern about fitness and can go hell for leather from the first bell

fandango_c

1,942 posts

191 months

Saturday 11th May 2013
quotequote all
Juanco20 said:
I'm guessing two rounds less means less concern about fitness and can go hell for leather from the first bell
Is there really that much difference between 10 and 12 rounds?

russ_a

4,655 posts

216 months

Saturday 11th May 2013
quotequote all
Did they cancel the bet before or after the fight?

Steameh

3,155 posts

215 months

Saturday 11th May 2013
quotequote all
Juanco20 said:
I'm guessing two rounds less means less concern about fitness and can go hell for leather from the first bell
3 Rounds of Prizefighter I can understand.

But 10 rounds? I can't see any fighter thinking. Balls I only have 10 rounds, best take some chances that I wouldn't take in a 12 round bout.

Juanco20

3,250 posts

198 months

Saturday 11th May 2013
quotequote all
Steameh said:
3 Rounds of Prizefighter I can understand.

But 10 rounds? I can't see any fighter thinking. Balls I only have 10 rounds, best take some chances that I wouldn't take in a 12 round bout.
Was only a suggestion, I've no idea as to the correct answer