Ghost...what a shame

Author
Discussion

Captain Speaking

Original Poster:

50 posts

188 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
I can't tell you how disappointed I was when I took my first trip in one of these recently.

The plastic door handles were the first shock and then a jumbled interior that just doesn't feel special. Beautifully put together yes, but the plastic-coated 'chrome' switches are a real shame - especially when you compare it to a new Mulsanne.

Exterior wise, unless it has the aluminium bonnet it just doesn't have any presence for me. You see them in London and if they're in a dark colour (like 90% of them), there is a hideous similarity to a Rover 75...

Is it just me?

Edited by Captain Speaking on Friday 31st December 19:06

MarsellusWallace

1,180 posts

208 months

Friday 31st December 2010
quotequote all
Nice car but I'd rather have an older Phantom for the same money instead.

andyh68

1,368 posts

180 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
I much prefer the looks of the Ghost over the Mulsanne, but was also disappointed that so many of the interior fittings are plastic. More manageable than a Phantom, so I would still have one in my garage...

AmitG

3,361 posts

167 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
I was fortunate enough to sit in (but not drive) the Ghost, and I half agree.

I think the exterior works brilliantly; for a car that's positioned between the S-Class/XJ/7-series and the Phantom, it has the right proportions, it's classy without being vulgar and it feels "special" in the way that it should. It couldn't be anything other than a Rolls Royce. I'm not keen on the suicide doors, but then I'm probably not their target market. And I think the bonnet should be body-coloured (not silver).

However, I was disappointed with the interior. There is no disputing the quality of the materials (some switchgear aside) and the general fit and finish. But the layout lacked the elegance and logic that I knew from the old Shadow and Spirit. There was a lack of design co-ordination between the different elements - the overall style being an awkward mash-up of art deco (clock, dials), traditional Rolls Royce (temperature controls, air vents) and modern BMW (iDrive, seat controls).

And I felt there was just too much going on. A Rolls Royce dashboard should be a model of simplicity; the controls should be the minimum required to operate all the functions of the car. Whilst I appreciate the huge amount of functionality in this car compared to (say) the Spirit, this didn't seem to be the case. It all felt too crowded and, dare I say it, Germanic.

I suspect that the designers were restricted by the need to use interior parts from the BMW 7-series, and had limited freedom in terms of switch placement.


Captain Speaking

Original Poster:

50 posts

188 months

Friday 7th January 2011
quotequote all
Very well written AmitG.

So I had a really good luck at a Mulsanne this week - an hour's poke-and-prod with no-one hovvering. It really IS special. Unbelievable cabin quality and build, the paint was flawless and it had a proper old Bentley feel (well, late Arnage T), ie pukka quality and nothing scrimped on. You really can see why it's a 220k car (250-260 with modest options). I am smitten.

Interestingly, I can have one to order for August delivery - I thought these things were sold out until 2012? Apparently not.

christofmccracke

881 posts

207 months

Saturday 8th January 2011
quotequote all
I have had the pleasure of being in both and for me the Phantom is a winner, has much more preasance and such a sense of occasion. Only problem is its mahoosive