Perfect Ride for our newborn

Perfect Ride for our newborn

Author
Discussion

Jinto100

Original Poster:

22 posts

150 months

Monday 4th August 2014
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 04 August 2014 at 18:50

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

189 months

Monday 4th August 2014
quotequote all
No ISOfix AND the old model Maxi-Cosi seat?

Oh dear biggrin

Jinto100

Original Poster:

22 posts

150 months

Monday 4th August 2014
quotequote all
HereBeMonsters said:
No ISOfix AND the old model Maxi-Cosi seat?

Oh dear biggrin
yeah I know, car seat was origionaly for our eldest and Isofix base in my Range Rover biggrin

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

189 months

Monday 4th August 2014
quotequote all
Well done though. I wanted to bring our son home in the Elise, but wife wouldn't allow it as no ISOfix.

Plus she'd have had to get the bus!

DoubleSix

12,011 posts

183 months

Monday 4th August 2014
quotequote all
ISOFIX no safer than belt fix, rather more convenient and less open to user (mong) error.

Just sayin'



HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

189 months

Monday 4th August 2014
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
ISOFIX no safer than belt fix, rather more convenient and less open to user (mong) error.

Just sayin'
Surely a system that stops the seat moving entirely is safer than one that allows a small amount then SNAP stops it?

DoubleSix

12,011 posts

183 months

Monday 4th August 2014
quotequote all
HereBeMonsters said:
DoubleSix said:
ISOFIX no safer than belt fix, rather more convenient and less open to user (mong) error.

Just sayin'
Surely a system that stops the seat moving entirely is safer than one that allows a small amount then SNAP stops it?
Nope. I follow your logic but having been through it recently there's no difference. It's just that 70% of belt fixed are installed incorrectly that leads to the statistical danger.

In fact I cant be sure from the pic but it looks as though there may be a twist in the belt concerned...



Edited by DoubleSix on Monday 4th August 16:34

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

189 months

Tuesday 5th August 2014
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
In fact I cant be sure from the pic but it looks as though there may be a twist in the belt concerned...
Ah, hence the deletion of the OP...

Still, I have it in my Temp Int files. Could always post it back up...

JonnyVTEC

3,081 posts

182 months

Tuesday 5th August 2014
quotequote all
HereBeMonsters said:
Surely a system that stops the seat moving entirely is safer than one that allows a small amount then SNAP stops it?
Did you fit it wrong then?

DoubleSix

12,011 posts

183 months

Tuesday 5th August 2014
quotequote all
HereBeMonsters said:
DoubleSix said:
In fact I cant be sure from the pic but it looks as though there may be a twist in the belt concerned...
Ah, hence the deletion of the OP...

Still, I have it in my Temp Int files. Could always post it back up...
Can't really tell from the pic anyway but I'm not here to admonish anyone, just sharing the info.