sleeper saxo

Author
Discussion

sprint gti

Original Poster:

17 posts

177 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
hi all.
iv bought a saxo a few months ago. had a few lil problems.
but it was only £200



then one day driving to a mates my car desided to put all its oil im with the water then went bang.

now the fun begins..
got a vts engine of my mate.
just finished fitting it.



all comments welcome.

thanks
paul

Somnophore

1,364 posts

182 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
Not really what I'd call a sleeper but sure it's fun enough to drive

sprint gti

Original Poster:

17 posts

177 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
so u wouldnt call 120bhp in a car that had a 55bhp 1.1 a sleeper...its a saxo 1.1 shell..

Somnophore

1,364 posts

182 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
I wouldn't call a modified saxo, with the engine from a more powerful version of the same car no. If it had a 3.0 v6 wedged in it then yes

Simes205

4,619 posts

234 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
That will certainly wipe the smile from a few faces!

sprint gti

Original Poster:

17 posts

177 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
that would be slower as its heavier and wont handle as there would be 2 much weight over the front end..


number2301

508 posts

206 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
No it wouldn't be slower. You can make the v6 205s just about handle so I don't see why you couldn't do it with a Saxo as well.

And no I don't particularly think it's that much of a sleeper, 120bhp in a car of that weight doesn't make it blisteringly fast (as I know from have 1.9 205 GTIs).

However it does look like a nice idea, I'd lose the sticker so it's more subtle. Great to see a Saxo taking the less is more approach! I've just bought a base model Saxo myself and having driven that I hope you've upgraded the standard suspension and brakes!

I do hope you've insured the engine, however even if you say you have I won't believe you wink

Somnophore

1,364 posts

182 months

Sunday 17th January 2010
quotequote all
exactly, its not THAT fast, and its not subtle enough, a good sleeper looks totally standard but is massively faster than standard

sprint gti

Original Poster:

17 posts

177 months

Monday 18th January 2010
quotequote all
true.. but i wouldnt call 145mph slow. read by my mates gps speed thing.

thx for your comments..

bullies180

1,833 posts

200 months

Monday 18th January 2010
quotequote all
sprint gti said:
true.. but i wouldnt call 145mph slow. read by my mates gps speed thing.

thx for your comments..
That sounds ambitious! 145 from a 1.6 16valve? You'd be hard pushed to get that speed out of a 2.0.

Ordinary_Chap

7,520 posts

249 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
sprint gti said:
true.. but i wouldnt call 145mph slow. read by my mates gps speed thing.

thx for your comments..
Not a chance.

I think someone's kidding you or your kidding yourself but not a chance.

Also a boy'd up saxo is in no way a sleeper.

Somnophore

1,364 posts

182 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
Hahah, fat chance, 145kph maybe, if youd have said indicated might have been tiny tiny bit believable but GPS speed no way. bear in mind an actual VTS tops out at 127mph

Kitchski

6,525 posts

237 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
I've put a VTS engine in a Saxo VTR, and I'd call it a sleeper.

If you drive a VTR around, you get all sorts of midlife crisis small weinered German barge drivers trying to push you around on normal A-B roads. 120bhp in a car that weighs 900kg and isn't as big as the Arc Royal can fairly easily get shot of an Audi A4 1.9TDI driven by a rep (sorry, sales development manager.)

Likewise if you drive said VTR around, you get younger guys in either 1.2 Clios with metal spoilers, or the Golf/Leon/A3 brigade (dressed as the hot models, but aren't) trying to push you around (not helped by the fact this VTR came with a number plate that advertises the fact it's a VTR). Unlike the above, who bunch all Saxos into the same bandwagon, these guys know what a VTR is. So when a VTR dispatches their mk4 Golf V5, it surprises them.

A Saxo with a 3.0 V6 up front wouldn't be a sleeper in reality. A 1.4 Fiesta could go point to point faster than said Saxo, it'd handle like a complete pig! Straight lines would be fairly epic, though.

It's all down to individual opinion really. I'd class my missus' Saxo (I just use it daily) as a sleeper cos people think they know what it is.
I'd class my BX 16v as a sleeper, because people do not know what it is.
I'd class my mate's Hyundai Sonata with an RV8 up front a sleeper too, if it worked!

And I'd class this lad's Saxo as a sleeper too. Nothing wrong with him coming on and displaying his work, it's a proud moment when you single-handedly do an engine conversion on a car and fire it up for the first time!
But yeah, I'd upgrade the suspension and brakes! laugh get some VTS gear on it, but keep small wheels. Keep the flat arches too, makes it look like a sleeper wink

(Don't forget some lexus lights and some extra badges. Make it look really cheesey!)

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

188 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
sprint gti said:
true.. but i wouldnt call 145mph slow. read by my mates gps speed thing.

thx for your comments..
What gearbox are you using then? And how can an engine which only propels the lower, more aerodynamic (marginally) VTS up to 130-ish manage to get yours to 145?

sprint gti

Original Poster:

17 posts

177 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
thank you Kitchski..

its a vtr box.. as it has a higher final drive..

and tbh i thought u guys would be nice on here..
i was just showing my work iv done.. and for £500 you try and get a car that beats clio 172's and keeps up with 2.0 mk4 golf gti's

bananapieface

403 posts

180 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
I tuned the tits off my 106gti, cams, headwork, ITBs, manifold, full rally exhaust blah blah 170bhp, never saw 145mph.

sprint gti

Original Poster:

17 posts

177 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
wot box were u using?

Ordinary_Chap

7,520 posts

249 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
sprint gti said:
thank you Kitchski..

its a vtr box.. as it has a higher final drive..

and tbh i thought u guys would be nice on here..
i was just showing my work iv done.. and for £500 you try and get a car that beats clio 172's and keeps up with 2.0 mk4 golf gti's
We are nice but will always call people out for making things up.

There is no way you've been anywhere near 145mph and also no way you've beaten 172's unless the driver is a bad one.

sprint gti

Original Poster:

17 posts

177 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
ok.. well il get my mate to behing me on his r1 then..

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

188 months

Tuesday 19th January 2010
quotequote all
sprint gti said:
and tbh i thought u guys would be nice on here..
i was just showing my work iv done.. and for £500 you try and get a car that beats clio 172's and keeps up with 2.0 mk4 golf gti's
The car is OK. It's stupid wild claims we are having an issue with. Why build what may be a fairly nippy little motor, then start spouting toss about it?

Reminds me of a bloke at Uni who had a brand new Audi S3 (yes, his parents bought it for him). He claimed he had it "tuned to over 500bhp" and he once outran a Police helicopter in it.

I would believe that it keeps up with Mk 4 Golf GTIs. As for "beating" Clio 172s, I doubt it. And that 145mph. No. Just no. You would need a LOT more power to get a Saxo to that sort of a speed. In my experience even with a diesel 5th ratio slotted in to the VTR final drive, it'd need to be pulling around 8,500 rpm to hit a real 145 mph.

Basically, you're a young chap with your first mildly fast car. Saxos are great fun to drive, and you think you can "have" anyone on the road. Stop making up silly things. This sort of banter may go down well on your local krooze forum or whatever, but Pistonheads is full of people with proper sports cars. 120bhp French shopping hatchbacks do not compare. Trust me, I know. ;-)