Restore or leave alone?
Discussion
Personal preference: restore. I’ve got a small collection of Dinky aircraft; IIRC the Whitley is quite rare - might be pre-war with the ‘gliding game’ hole in the fuselage. Mine is a bit rough - the mazak metal is fatigued and the fuselage bent. Opted to leave it unrestored purely because the majority of paint is still there.
Is the car Dinky? Don’t recognise it.
ETA - according to my reference book, all Whitleys were produced 1939 - 41, or 1937 - 41 for the silver version. Early versions had the fuselage hole.
Is the car Dinky? Don’t recognise it.
ETA - according to my reference book, all Whitleys were produced 1939 - 41, or 1937 - 41 for the silver version. Early versions had the fuselage hole.
Edited by dr_gn on Wednesday 22 April 14:49
Looking more and more like a slush mould/mold/cast copy of a Dinky 23C Mercedes. Normally done in the Thirties, lots of Italian makers were doing it amongst others and actually some can be rarer than the original Dinky version.
If you're lucky, there may be a name on the inside of the casting, but probably not.
If you're lucky, there may be a name on the inside of the casting, but probably not.
W12GT said:
I’d leave them as they are, if you restore them and they don’t look right then you will have ruined them!
They don't look right now! Plus, you can always strip the paint and try again. I can't believe they're worth much more than sentimental value in their current condition.ottovonskidmark said:
Drgn I know what you mean, I may think I leave them as they are for a while. I guess when you said sentimental it stopped me. When you find old things you get into restore mode.
Thanks to all and stay well.
Agreed, as soon as you restore them, they wouldn’t be recognisable as your grandfathers things. With my late dads old Dinky toys, we restored some of them together, the rest I’ve left alone. Thanks to all and stay well.
Gassing Station | Scale Models | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff