Tamiya Spitfire MKI - 1/48 scale new tool

Tamiya Spitfire MKI - 1/48 scale new tool

Author
Discussion

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
A Christmas pressie. Tamiyas great looking new tool early Spitfire.
I’m going to paint mine as N3200 a restored aircraft that now resides not too far from me at Duxford. The aircraft was originally shot down and crash landed during the evacuation of Dunkirk.


The aircraft was restored a few years ago and looks great today.


Here’s the box art and contents.









There is also a clear sprue, but that picture won’t upload for some reason.

£35 for 4 sprues and a bit of photoetch isn’t cheap, but the quality does seem exceptional.

More pictures later....

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
I decided to go against the instructions and start with the pilot.
You have to decide open or closed cockpit at the beginning, so how the pilot turned out was going to be a decision maker. I think he’s probably good enough to use.
What do you think?



Edited by robemcdonald on Saturday 29th December 15:56

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
I just posted the pilot picture on a Facebook group I’m a member of. It asked me to tag the person in the picture, so I named him ginger. At least I’ve managed to impress an algorithm...

NDA

22,299 posts

232 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
biggrin

tight5

2,747 posts

166 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
I think he probably good enough to use.
Deffo.
thumbup

gruffgriff

1,736 posts

250 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
I'd be proud to fly with Ginger!

The_Jackal

4,854 posts

204 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
Silly question I know, but why did they make the roundel on the fuselage soo big it overlaps the top.
I always though kit manufacturers just printed the decals slightly too big, but that restored one I guess is 100% accurate.
Surely a bit smaller and it would save on paint and time in the middle of a war?

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
The_Jackal said:
Silly question I know, but why did they make the roundel on the fuselage soo big it overlaps the top.
I always though kit manufacturers just printed the decals slightly too big, but that restored one I guess is 100% accurate.
Surely a bit smaller and it would save on paint and time in the middle of a war?
I have no idea I’m sure Eric would most likely know.
My question is why the red circle at the centre of the roundel is actually a separate decal.
I’ve noticed that revell do this as well, but not Eduard.

I’d love to know why.

Stuzza

138 posts

95 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
The red central part was omitted in the Far East to avoid confusion with Japanese markings.

dr_gn

16,392 posts

191 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
The_Jackal said:
Silly question I know, but why did they make the roundel on the fuselage soo big it overlaps the top.
I always though kit manufacturers just printed the decals slightly too big, but that restored one I guess is 100% accurate.
Surely a bit smaller and it would save on paint and time in the middle of a war?
I have no idea I’m sure Eric would most likely know.
My question is why the red circle at the centre of the roundel is actually a separate decal.
I’ve noticed that revell do this as well, but not Eduard.

I’d love to know why.
The separate red dots are to get around printing errors when two or more colours are printed on one decal. If the separate ink layers are not perfectly aligned, the dots will be off centre. Separating them is a bit of a bodge, but allows the modeller to get them perfect.

The roundel yellow thickness is just a result of standard diameter ratios of RAF roundel colours at various times during the war.

V8FGO

1,651 posts

212 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
Yellow painted around 35" roundal rather than the 25 inch.
https://boxartden.com/reference/gallery/var/resize...

Explained more in this section
https://boxartden.com/reference/gallery/index.php/...

Edited by V8FGO on Saturday 29th December 20:35

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Sunday 30th December 2018
quotequote all
I’ve spent the last couple of days painting and assembling the cockpit.

Sorry the pictures are a bit rubbish.








robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Sunday 30th December 2018
quotequote all
Marginally better pictures


robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Monday 31st December 2018
quotequote all
Got the fuselage buttoned up and the wings on. It really is a doddle. You almost don’t need any glue.
You have to hand it to the guys at Tamiya, they really have the engineering thing nailed.

russy01

4,724 posts

188 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
Great to see this being built.

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
Thanks Russy. It’s practice for the big 1/32 Mark IX I got from you.

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
A few more pics.







NDA

22,299 posts

232 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
I am not a modeller.... just interested....

How do you get the faded edges to the camouflage when using masking tape?

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,127 posts

203 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
In this case I traced around the edge with my airbrush as I wasn’t happy with the sharp demarcation that masking gave even though it is more scale accurate.
Next time I’ll probably use the blue tack method.

wolfracesonic

7,485 posts

134 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
Is it possible to do the camouflage patterns freehand with the airbrush, or don't you trust your hands to be steady enough?smile