Airfix 1:72 B-25 New tool

Airfix 1:72 B-25 New tool

Author
Discussion

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,128 posts

203 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
My last project was a car so the new one have to be a plane.

This is a really nice kit, with some great detail. At £25 it’s not too expensive either.
The first stage is to paint and assemble the front cockpit area up to the bomb bay bulkhead.


The only aftermarket parts I’m going to use here are going to be the Eduard canopy masks currently enroute from hannants.
The kit so far goes together really nicely, so I don’t think it’s going to be an overly long build.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

268 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Will it need some weight added to prevent it sitting tail down?

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,128 posts

203 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
The instructions say 25g I’ll probably double that to be sure.

I have to say I’m suitably impressed by the kit though.

dr_gn

16,403 posts

191 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Nice subject - what are the panel lines like?

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,128 posts

203 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Well, lots of reviews say they are out of scale and too deep, but by the time they’ve been primed and painted I think they’re no problem.
The surfaces really are beautifully moulded with great attention to detail. The only slight negatives are the Airfix one bag for all sprues issue and the slightly nasty plastic they use. I also think they could charge a few quid extra and throw in some die cut canopy masks though.

Going back to the Tamiya jeep. I would say this would be a much better kit for a first timer or someone getting back into the hobby.

dr_gn

16,403 posts

191 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
Well, lots of reviews say they are out of scale and too deep, but by the time they’ve been primed and painted I think they’re no problem.
The surfaces really are beautifully moulded with great attention to detail. The only slight negatives are the Airfix one bag for all sprues issue and the slightly nasty plastic they use. I also think they could charge a few quid extra and throw in some die cut canopy masks though.

Going back to the Tamiya jeep. I would say this would be a much better kit for a first timer or someone getting back into the hobby.
Hmm crap panel lines are a common problem with new-tool Airfix.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

268 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Is there any easy way to tell a recent tool Airfix from a 1960s relic in a new box? Or do I have to research the individual kit?

dr_gn

16,403 posts

191 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Is there any easy way to tell a recent tool Airfix from a 1960s relic in a new box? Or do I have to research the individual kit?
Nope, Scalemates gives a timeline of a particular kit though. Make sure you get the right box art and/or kit number!

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,128 posts

203 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Is there any easy way to tell a recent tool Airfix from a 1960s relic in a new box? Or do I have to research the individual kit?
Nope, Scalemates gives a timeline of a particular kit though. Make sure you get the right box art and/or kit number!
A06015 is the kit number, but I certain other versions are on the way. The box art is as per my original post.

Yertis

18,659 posts

273 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
robemcdonald said:
Well, lots of reviews say they are out of scale and too deep, but by the time they’ve been primed and painted I think they’re no problem.
The surfaces really are beautifully moulded with great attention to detail. The only slight negatives are the Airfix one bag for all sprues issue and the slightly nasty plastic they use. I also think they could charge a few quid extra and throw in some die cut canopy masks though.

Going back to the Tamiya jeep. I would say this would be a much better kit for a first timer or someone getting back into the hobby.
Hmm crap panel lines are a common problem with new-tool Airfix.
Out of interest – and this isn't a sarky question –  would you prefer no representation of panel lines at all? As an armchair modeller it occurs to me that they cause more trouble than they're worth, and representation of panels would be better made with careful shading and so on.

dr_gn

16,403 posts

191 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Yertis said:
dr_gn said:
robemcdonald said:
Well, lots of reviews say they are out of scale and too deep, but by the time they’ve been primed and painted I think they’re no problem.
The surfaces really are beautifully moulded with great attention to detail. The only slight negatives are the Airfix one bag for all sprues issue and the slightly nasty plastic they use. I also think they could charge a few quid extra and throw in some die cut canopy masks though.

Going back to the Tamiya jeep. I would say this would be a much better kit for a first timer or someone getting back into the hobby.
Hmm crap panel lines are a common problem with new-tool Airfix.
Out of interest – and this isn't a sarky question –  would you prefer no representation of panel lines at all? As an armchair modeller it occurs to me that they cause more trouble than they're worth, and representation of panels would be better made with careful shading and so on.
No. I have drawn panel lines on models before - on a 1:72 Mosquito and an old 1:32 Spitfire. It's a massive pain in the arse. Finely moulded lines are far better overall.

It's personal preference. Even the finest panel lines at 1:72 are likely to be over-scale. If you somehow scaled down a real aircraft to 1:72, I doubt the panel lines themselves would be visible at all from any reasonable viewing distance, but the weathering resulting from them might be. However, in a small scale model you're treading the line between reality and what you expect to see.

If they're well rendered and fine, they're pretty much indistinguishable from drawn-on lines once finished. That's what I aim for. If they get too wide and deep, any panel wash makes the model look like a jigsaw puzzle. You might say "so don't use a wash", but then a model can often look too flat and featureless, plus the wash adds to any subtle weathering.

It's not much of an issue if you're just using he most basic painting techniques, but for those of us who prefer some refinement and subtle weathering, wide panel lines (along with poor transparent parts) are the two aspects of a kit that are the most difficult to correct.


designforlife

3,739 posts

170 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
i remember building this airfix kit (or an iteration of it) as a kid some 25 odd years ago...the fuselage plastic was so warped it was impossible to build! One very disappointed 9 year old birthday boy.

dr_gn

16,403 posts

191 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
designforlife said:
i remember building this airfix kit (or an iteration of it) as a kid some 25 odd years ago...the fuselage plastic was so warped it was impossible to build! One very disappointed 9 year old birthday boy.
That would be the 1965 tooling.

Anyway, enough of hijacking the thread - looking forward to what robemcdonald can do with it.

Yertis

18,659 posts

273 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
No. I have drawn panel lines on models before - on a 1:72 Mosquito and an old 1:32 Spitfire. It's a massive pain in the arse. Finely moulded lines are far better overall.

It's personal preference. Even the finest panel lines at 1:72 are likely to be over-scale. If you somehow scaled down a real aircraft to 1:72, I doubt the panel lines themselves would be visible at all from any reasonable viewing distance, but the weathering resulting from them might be. However, in a small scale model you're treading the line between reality and what you expect to see.

If they're well rendered and fine, they're pretty much indistinguishable from drawn-on lines once finished. That's what I aim for. If they get too wide and deep, any panel wash makes the model look like a jigsaw puzzle. You might say "so don't use a wash", but then a model can often look too flat and featureless, plus the wash adds to any subtle weathering.

It's not much of an issue if you're just using he most basic painting techniques, but for those of us who prefer some refinement and subtle weathering, wide panel lines (along with poor transparent parts) are the two aspects of a kit that are the most difficult to correct.
Thanks for that. My wife has just started dress-making again, which affords me the opportunity to restart my modelling. And like all projects I undertake, I'm massively over-thinking it beforehand. rolleyes

Once I've bought a new compressor that Tempest may get completed...

Eric Mc

122,854 posts

272 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Is there any easy way to tell a recent tool Airfix from a 1960s relic in a new box? Or do I have to research the individual kit?
The Scalemates website is good for checking the history of a kit.

Eric Mc

122,854 posts

272 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
designforlife said:
i remember building this airfix kit (or an iteration of it) as a kid some 25 odd years ago...the fuselage plastic was so warped it was impossible to build! One very disappointed 9 year old birthday boy.
That kit is now withdrawn so won't be issued by Airfix again. All the reports I've seen and read of the new B-25 have been pretty positive. I saw a built one at my last club meeting and it looks lovely.

Yertis

18,659 posts

273 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
That kit is now withdrawn so won't be issued by Airfix again. All the reports I've seen and read of the new B-25 have been pretty positive. I saw a built one at my last club meeting and it looks lovely.
It was a fun kit though – all those nose options! biggrin

robemcdonald

Original Poster:

9,128 posts

203 months

Friday 20th April 2018
quotequote all
Here is a pic of a section of the fuselage


And the upper wing


I don’t think they’re overly deep or wide and there is some very fine rivet detail.

Whether you’d see this level of detail at this scale is another question, but for me it’s not too over the top.

On to a progress update.
I have managed to complete one side of the fuselage.

lufbramatt

5,427 posts

141 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
Great progress, nice to see one of these being built up smile

the old kit was of a later J model, which has a deeper fuselage to fit the tail turret in. The new kit is of the early type aircraft.

what scheme are you going for?

re. panel lines. they're no deeper or wider than any other recent Airfix release. No they're not tamigawa fine, but they make their moulds in a different way, which costs an order of magnitude more. I've seen some really odd comments about this kit (think it was on ARC) that bear no semblance to reality, so take what you read on forums with a pinch of salt smile

Edited by lufbramatt on Monday 23 April 16:15

dr_gn

16,403 posts

191 months

Monday 23rd April 2018
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
re. panel lines. they're no deeper or wider than any other recent Airfix release.
Is there something different about the new tool 1:72 Bf109 E3/4? I built one of the first ones, and the panel lines seemed much finer than other kits.

I bought another recently (E3) for my son, and that too looks to have slightly finer surface detail, particularly the fuselage. I also noticed that the stbd fuselage wing root issues and the tailplane strut hole errors had been corrected - was it partly an injection pressure issue on the early release or something, or were the moulds re-worked?