New shape XC90 Economy

New shape XC90 Economy

Author
Discussion

ClaphamGT3

Original Poster:

11,527 posts

250 months

Sunday 21st October 2018
quotequote all
We have a 65 plate D5 Momentum.

On a motorway run, with two bikes on the roof, we are getting about 35mpg when cruising at 85/90. This seems pretty poor to be honest - not much better than our old shape one.

What are other people getting?

djone101

950 posts

291 months

Monday 22nd October 2018
quotequote all
Our 18 plate Momentum D5 on a motorway run is around 40-42mpg. I don't think that's too bad for the size of the thing and the fact it's an auto.

Murph7355

38,914 posts

263 months

Monday 22nd October 2018
quotequote all
ClaphamGT3 said:
We have a 65 plate D5 Momentum.

On a motorway run, with two bikes on the roof, we are getting about 35mpg when cruising at 85/90. This seems pretty poor to be honest - not much better than our old shape one.

What are other people getting?
Not entirely sure, but I suspect not hugely dissimilar - it's significantly better than our old mk1 XC90 smile

At that speed and with bikes on the roof I don't think that sounds too bad to me. Have you seen what you get if you ease off the gas? Or with nothing attached to the roof?

Steve996

1,240 posts

222 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2018
quotequote all
2018 R line, had it for a week and best I’ve managed so far is 38mpg on an a road commute. Was hoping for a bit better TBH. Having said that, very, very impressed with the car overall.

pmanson

13,387 posts

260 months

Wednesday 24th October 2018
quotequote all
2018 D5 inscription pro. 7k miles on the clock now.

Average is 30.5 with a mix of town and motorway run.

Normally see late 30s on a motorway run at typical motorway speeds (although I do tend to use the pilot assist)

delmatt

506 posts

198 months

Tuesday 20th November 2018
quotequote all
Are they motorbikes then?

The additional wind resistance of two bikes will be having a huge affect at that speed. Try sticking a hand out of a window or sunroof and you can feel what sort of resistance and bike handlebars, pedals and seats will be an even greater force.

watchnut

1,197 posts

136 months

Wednesday 12th December 2018
quotequote all
I would suggest at those speeds and that much wind resistance that you are getting great fuel economy.

If you tried 70 mph for same journey, you would more than likely get there in about the same time as you can never keep to the 85/90 owing to having to slow down/accelerate back up to those speeds and therefore adding to your fuel consumption

If you want better economy, why did you buy that sort of car anyway?

Patrick Bateman

12,325 posts

181 months

Wednesday 26th December 2018
quotequote all
I concur. Sit at 70. Pretty sure the economy of any car takes a significant hit at the speeds you're talking about.

Ilovejapcrap

3,297 posts

119 months

Wednesday 26th December 2018
quotequote all
put the bikes on back rather than roof as an experiment

snake_oil

2,039 posts

82 months

Thursday 27th December 2018
quotequote all
I have done a lot of motorway miles in my V90 D4 with and without Thule aerobars. I'm about 4-5mpg down with the bars on - and that's with no bikes attached! It's crazy how much drag affects the mpg especially at higher speeds.