Volvo C70, "Mk 1" or "Mk 2"

Volvo C70, "Mk 1" or "Mk 2"

Author
Discussion

Skyedriver

Original Poster:

18,594 posts

288 months

Friday 30th August 2013
quotequote all
There is an early shape Mk 1 and a later fronted Mk 2. Obviously there is a price difference but are the later cars any better? Or are the older cars better built.
Is the Road Fund Tax higher on the post 2006 cars?
Cheers.

JagPJ

293 posts

211 months

Friday 30th August 2013
quotequote all
I've just bought a mk2, having looked at both. It's leaps and bounds better. Comfort, performance and handling are so much better.

Personally I think it's more a case of mk1 V mk3!

norchi

355 posts

228 months

Saturday 31st August 2013
quotequote all
The original C70 was built on the old '850' platform and you could get it as a hardtop or convertible with various petrol engines up to the T5.

The later C70, built on the Focus platform was only available as hard top convertible, you could get a diesel though.....

No problems really with either of these models that cannot be dealt with by a dealer (you need to research the best as there are some bandits), a good local specialist or yourself with some competence.

www.volvoforums.org.uk and www.t5d5.org are good starting points.

Don.

morgrp

4,128 posts

204 months

Sunday 1st September 2013
quotequote all
Personally I like the MK1 but then a) I own one, and b) I love the 850 on which is based.
I certainly think the Mk1 is more robust than a Mk2 but they do have their problems.
I don't like the fact the MK2 is not available as sole coupe (and don't say a metal folding roof makes it a coupe - I'm sorry it simply doesn't - namely the 5 tons of strengthening and roof mechanism prevent this). if you're hell bent on a convertible then def get a Mk2 - the MK1 convertible frankly drives like a blancmange,

but a tidy mk1 T5 GT coupe is tasty bit of kit -If I were to buy another though, I'd ditch my auto in favor of a manual - Auto blunts the performance too much

williredale

2,866 posts

158 months

Sunday 1st September 2013
quotequote all
Disclaimer: I have a mk1 coupe.


They're very different cars. From your original post I don't know if you're interested in coupe or convertible or what engine. If you're looking at the convertible, the second generation is a very clever roof and I think it's a good looking car. Much prettier than any other four seat folding hard top. Give us some more information as to what you're looking for.

martinrpeachey

749 posts

151 months

Sunday 1st September 2013
quotequote all
JagPJ said:
I've just bought a mk2, having looked at both. It's leaps and bounds better. Comfort, performance and handling are so much better.

Personally I think it's more a case of mk1 V mk3!
I take it you haven't driven both?

Mk1 250bhp, 1500 Kg

Focus based C70 225bhp 1700Kg

Comfort wise, the ford version is stunning and cornering is surprisingly good too but they're no sports car.