Which ECU for Griff

Which ECU for Griff

Author
Discussion

steve-V8s

Original Poster:

2,910 posts

255 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
Which is the popular ECU ad coil packs to replace the Lucas box and dizzy ? It seems each engine builder has his own favourite and generally they seem to like either Omex or DTA. Emerald it seems appeals to the home modders and to me because of the obvious support directly from the manufacturer and you can actually take the car to them for any mapping issues. Then there are the MegaSquirt and other open source ones or build one yourself (not that complex really just to get the fuel and sparks in the right place). Suppose one thing to consider is driving the existing instruments although that is probably not the most important thing. The Emerald programming software seems fairly easy to understand and slightly more polished than the Omex that I have briefly seen, the serious modders and race car people seem to favour the DTA. What initially seems a simple choice becomes more complex the more you look at it.

What are your experiences and opinions please.

Boosted LS1

21,198 posts

267 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
The DTA has really good software and is easy to use plus you get launch and traction control included. The Omex may be more sophisticated, it has a knock sensor input but no launch/traction control. I can't comment about emerald. I lean towards the DTA as a stand alone knocklink could be used/purchased seperately.

cinquecento

555 posts

232 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I am a HUGE megasquirt fan having recently completed my MS install with EDIS coil packs on my 96 Griff. I can't really compare MS with another ECU, however I love MS because you really get to learn how your car works... by doing EVERYTHING yourself. MS is the ultimate DIY ECU.

I choose to make my own(read solder it together!!), make a wiring loom from an old 14CUX plug (so I could revert back to the original if need be) to plug into the harness, install and tune myself. I choose a TechEdge Wideband contollor with Bosch EGO sensor too($USD400).

The forums are useful and the documentation is extensive. It's very cheap (approx $250USD) however it was the DIY/learning aspect that got me. The ECU is reliable, has good data logging and more importantly, allows you to analyse your car. It's interesting the nummber of PH threads asking for assistance.. when looking into an OEM ECU's diagnostics show up problems immediately.

MS is a great a learning tool.. if you don't really care about understanding how your engine works and operates, then maybe MS is not the correct choice.

Boosted LS1

21,198 posts

267 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
^ With respect MS is how the electronics work, not the engine which is mechanical and would work with a mechanical carburettor.

GreenV8S

30,478 posts

291 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
Boosted LS1 said:
^ With respect MS is how the electronics work, not the engine which is mechanical and would work with a mechanical carburettor.
I interpreted the comment as being about the engine management system; the original 14CUX is pretty inaccessible and hard to diagnose and more or less impossible for the average DIYer to tune. Pretty much any aftermarket system is going to be a breath of fresh air after that, even if they are not as capable in some respects as the original ECU.

Boosted LS1

21,198 posts

267 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
It was this sentence that confused me a bit.

"MS is a great a learning tool.. if you don't really care about understanding how your engine works and operates, then maybe MS is not the correct choice."

You have to have some mechanical empathy.



cinquecento

555 posts

232 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
No problems.. I suppose I mean't things like AFRs, warmup and accel enrichment, spark advance IAT temps and MAP/altitude settings (and the effects of change) are more exposed..




Markh

2,781 posts

282 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
I run an Autronic SM-4, pleased with results, but I think the guys who set it up found it a pain

spend

12,581 posts

258 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
Boosted LS1 said:
The DTA has really good software and is easy to use plus you get launch and traction control included. The Omex may be more sophisticated, it has a knock sensor input but no launch/traction control. I can't comment about emerald. I lean towards the DTA as a stand alone knocklink could be used/purchased seperately.
If you consider knock sensing important, then Emerald is probably not for you. Mr Walker does not seem to be an advocate.

The more ECU's I look at, it still seems that VEM's has far more capabilities and standard features than any of them (whether you choose to implement the functions or not is still your choice). Even with the Euro exchange rate it is still in the 'budget' price range.

Markh

2,781 posts

282 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
I run an Autronic SM-4, pleased with results, but I think the guys who set it up found it a pain

trackcar

6,453 posts

233 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
so true he said it twice smile

Boosted LS1

21,198 posts

267 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
Eh, what did he say?

dnb

3,330 posts

249 months

Friday 14th November 2008
quotequote all
spend said:
The more ECU's I look at, it still seems that VEM's has far more capabilities and standard features than any of them (whether you choose to implement the functions or not is still your choice). Even with the Euro exchange rate it is still in the 'budget' price range.
Nice to have another advocate of VEMS. I've installed it on a few different makes and models of cars now and mostly it's been straight forward. There are some "rough edges" with the product, but they tend to be in the areas where it doesn't matter beyond initial installation (eg sensor calibration). However, there are some areas of brilliance in the ECU. A mechanic friend (and generally an accomplice in my crazy schemes) drove a new build 2.5 Impreza for the first time the other week, expecting it to be - in his words - "shunty like a rally car with a Pectel ECU..." where it was in fact quite smooth and progressive. I had spent very little time on the actual mapping - certainly nothing more than ensuring it idled and didn't stall.

tinker-27

835 posts

231 months

Monday 17th November 2008
quotequote all
a vote here for emerald,"does what it says on the tin" with great back up which means a lot, and they dyno there own stuff which they know well.not bad money either,

450Nick

4,027 posts

219 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
One more vote for the Emerald from me. I run an Emerald on my SC450, but have also played with the DTA software a fair bit and I have to say it is pretty horrible to use. I was shocked at how old it looked when I first saw it and it really made me glad that I had gone Emerald on my car. It's just so much better layed out and is a dream to use. If you like to tinker, get the Emerald. It will also support traction control though not to the extent of the DTA but I never intend to use either traction control or launch control anyway being that it is for girls biggrin

rev-erend

21,536 posts

291 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Another vote here for :

EMERALD

Been very easy to use.

Looking forward to starting it with the new engine smokin

Pupp

12,357 posts

279 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Might as well add another 'yay' for Emerald. Had a few doubts at first but well won over now

chedder

1,329 posts

214 months

Tuesday 18th November 2008
quotequote all
Another Emerald advocate as one is going on my Wedge this winter

Graham

16,369 posts

291 months

Friday 21st November 2008
quotequote all
I've put emeralds in two cars now, the original one that went in my chim and then transfered to the tuscan racer, which we then replaced when we went wasted spark.

The only trouble with emerald is they can be a bit slow on the supply side, but if you have a problem they are quick, with repairs or checking

G

shpub

8,507 posts

279 months

Friday 21st November 2008
quotequote all
Key point is.... who is going to do the mapping/setup? It is often easier to select the ECU that the guy know rather than get one that he doesn't and then pay for him to go up a learning curve.

I've used a DTA on my Wedge V8 right from single throttle to the current supercharged state. I've also used the MBE stuff which is incredibly sophisticated but can be daunting to set up. So many variations....