Can I legally overtake here?

Can I legally overtake here?

Author
Discussion

billbring

Original Poster:

236 posts

190 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
A relatively new addition to a town bypass local to me has been this red hatched area down the middle of the road. It's NSL and used to be a single dashed line which was a good overtaking spot that most people took advantage of since you'd often come off a roundabout onto this road behind a lorry and it's an uphill section that is straight for the best part of a mile.

Since the red hatching has been added, nobody overtakes there. But my understanding is that it is still perfectly legal due to the dashed line, and I can't find anything in the highway code that gives the red road surface any significance.


BoRED S2upid

20,346 posts

247 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
It’s to put you off overtaking but as you say it’s a broken white line so still legal to overtake, solid white line obviously not.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,589 posts

242 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
Is that Bingham bypass?

I think they've added those because Muppets overtake when cars are oncoming to make a three car party.

Don't know the legalities, but I think they are there to warn people who are hard of thinking!

SydneyBridge

9,424 posts

165 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
130
Areas of white diagonal stripes or chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right.
If the area is bordered by a broken white line, you should not enter the area unless it is necessary and you can see that it is safe to do so.
If the area is marked with chevrons and bordered by solid white lines you MUST NOT enter it except in an emergency.
Laws MT(E&W)R regs 5, 9, 10 & 16, MT(S)R regs 4, 8, 9 & 14, RTA sect 36 & TSRGD 10(1)

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,589 posts

242 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
An elderly lady killed a cyclist who was turning right (if it is Bingham). I'm guessing it might be a reaction to that too.


Forester1965

2,803 posts

10 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
Can't think of a reason it's not allowed. However a couple of things spring to mind;

- You're going to put people's backs up because most will assume you're not supposed to use it
- If something goes wrong and you're accused of driving dangerously or carelessly, using that section will be brought up
- Very few vehicles will use it, meaning there'll be a lot of stones, nails, sharp stuff and detritus your going to drive over. It may cause a puncture or throw up items into other vehicles, leading to being reported for poor driving...

billbring

Original Poster:

236 posts

190 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
It is Bingham bypass, good spot!


SydneyBridge said:
130
Areas of white diagonal stripes or chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right.
If the area is bordered by a broken white line, you should not enter the area unless it is necessary and you can see that it is safe to do so.
If the area is marked with chevrons and bordered by solid white lines you MUST NOT enter it except in an emergency.
Laws MT(E&W)R regs 5, 9, 10 & 16, MT(S)R regs 4, 8, 9 & 14, RTA sect 36 & TSRGD 10(1)
What exactly does 'necessary' mean?

I would consider getting past a Daewoo Matiz doing exactly half the speed limit whilst I need to get home for a piss 'necessary', but unsure if the law agrees.

And am I correct in thinking that the red paint has no significance?

SydneyBridge

9,424 posts

165 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
Could not find anything in the highway code about the red

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,589 posts

242 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
SydneyBridge said:
Could not find anything in the highway code about the red
I think it's a bit like beige outlines used. It's supposed to give a better impression of speed. It also adds to the "drama".

I think those markings are a good idea, as they do seem to have reduced the number of idiots who believe it's OK to overtake when there are oncoming vehicles. (I use that stretch of road fairly regularly).

outnumbered

4,379 posts

241 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
Perfectly legal, but in general more paint means there have been accidents in the past, so worth using extra caution.

ScoobyChris

1,809 posts

209 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
billbring said:
What exactly does 'necessary' mean?

I would consider getting past a Daewoo Matiz doing exactly half the speed limit whilst I need to get home for a piss 'necessary', but unsure if the law agrees.

And am I correct in thinking that the red paint has no significance?
Necessity isn’t about whether the overtake is needed or not (who can judge that!). Necessity is about needing that bit of road to safely complete the manoeuvre.

Chris

billbring

Original Poster:

236 posts

190 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
Thanks all. Some interesting points and things to think about that I wasn't previously.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,589 posts

242 months

Sunday 20th October
quotequote all
There are average speed cameras along that section. You'll be amazed how many people don't know my Ranger should only be doing 50 along there. hehe