Is this too much? ...Your opinions most welcome.

Is this too much? ...Your opinions most welcome.

Author
Discussion

Rawhide66

Original Poster:

47 posts

174 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Someone has made a complaint about my driving.
They’ve captured on dash cam, put it on YouTube and emailed the link to work.

The back story is that the lead car at the island in lane 1 was not moving anywhere. A queue had developed with about 15 cars in and I came up the right hand lane to the island and turned left.

There is just left or right at this particular island, there is no straight on.
There are also 2 lanes in and 2 lanes out.
So there is little possibility for a conflict of interests in this particular instance.
That’s said, I was watching and in the event someone was going right from lane 1 I’d have just simply go round with them, done a 450° turn and carried on my way.

So I would argue that what I did was not dangerous and if it was, then to whom?
I would also argue it’s not even discourteous, as no one was impacted by this manoeuvre in any way. No one had to brake and no one swerved.

Despite driving a white van as part of my job, I don’t tailgate, I treat pedestrians, horse riders and cyclists with the upmost courtesy and respect and I don’t lose it with learners and always come down to 30 by the time I’ve entered a 30. So not completely irresponsible.

The incident occurred where the A41 is met by the A518.
https://goo.gl/maps/i1iiQbXn9oxJRgFK6
I am travelling along the A518 approaching the island having come from Telford.

As I said I take my driving very seriously, I will take on board any comments with a view to self improvement. Accordingly, I now put myself on trial, but before people whose skills and experience I value.

However, I would stress I am aware of the Highway Code and what it says about lane choice...
I am also aware lane choice is advisory and not mandatory.
And as I said, I’m only using lane2 because 10 or more cars are sat in lane 1 doing nothing,
whilst lane 2 is doing nothing.

I don’t slow for the island because I can see the way ahead and to my right is clear.

Here is a link to the clip

https://youtu.be/V-MkwakCLIs


Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 10:49


Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 10:50


Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 10:51


Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 11:00

steveo3002

10,647 posts

180 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
bit fast the if the other car had decided to go right /do something daft....otherwise yeah why not

CABC

5,762 posts

107 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
too fast, you weren't in control if something happened, like the slow guy in lane 1 doing the expected unexpected as he's confused/distracted.
understandable to be frustrated, but these ditherers are most likely to do something odd without looking. and so it's not unexpected.
and because you're in a white van it's twice as bad laugh (same as with sports cars, witnesses always unconsciously add 10-20mph)

scoey1001

774 posts

87 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Looked a bit pacey laugh and you did stray just a touch into the left hand lane. Otherwise don't see the issue.

Countdown

41,726 posts

202 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Rawhide66 said:
The back story is that the lead car at the island in lane 1 was not moving anywhere. A queue had developed with about 15 cars in and I came up the right hand lane to the island and turned left.
Here is a link to the clip

https://youtu.be/V-MkwakCLIs
AFAICS the vehicles in lane 1 ARE moving confused

Was it the case that there was a long queue in L1 and you wanted to overtake them all?

Rawhide66

Original Poster:

47 posts

174 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Countdown said:
AFAICS the vehicles in lane 1 ARE moving confused

Was it the case that there was a long queue in L1 and you wanted to overtake them all?
They only started moving as I approached the front of the queue, by that time I was committed.

Pica-Pica

14,353 posts

90 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Not something I would do, plus how soon the exit lane narrows from two to one, we don’t know, but it does, as the sign shows.
To make the manoeuvre you did, you must be familiar with the layout, perhaps too familiar. The front vehicle is not indicating left (although it does go left) and you were not in a position to see it’s left indicator, even if it was going left. It could well have gone straight on.
Too many possibilities of conflict for my liking.

Pica-Pica

14,353 posts

90 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Rawhide66 said:
Countdown said:
AFAICS the vehicles in lane 1 ARE moving confused

Was it the case that there was a long queue in L1 and you wanted to overtake them all?
They only started moving as I approached the front of the queue, by that time I was committed.
Never over-commit.

JamesRF

1,055 posts

104 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
At the speed you were going and how committed you were to the left turn I would suggest you wouldn’t have been able to avoid the car had it decided to change its course. You took a bit of a gamble to skip the queue and hoped the roundabout was clear for you to carry the speed onto it. It ultimately paid off for you.

It’s the sort of thing we all see multiple times a day and other than someone capturing it on their dashcam for a YouTube compilation and maybe feeling aggrieved that you got ahead of them, it’s forgotten about rather quickly.

Did you commit an awful crime? No you didn’t.

Would you have done that with a police car sitting in the queue? You already know the answer smile

Rawhide66

Original Poster:

47 posts

174 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
Not something I would do, plus how soon the exit lane narrows from two to one, we don’t know, but it does, as the sign shows.
To make the manoeuvre you did, you must be familiar with the layout, perhaps too familiar. The front vehicle is not indicating left (although it does go left) and you were not in a position to see it’s left indicator, even if it was going left. It could well have gone straight on.
Too many possibilities of conflict for my liking.
I did say in the text straight on isn’t an option and if I turned left then I could have turned right so I could have avoided an unexpected manoeuvre that I was already expecting.

You skipped the main course and gone straight for pudding...



The filter lane is about 400 metres long. If it was a little short one that would have just been too rude.

Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 11:38

Countdown

41,726 posts

202 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Just had a look at the Google Streetview and it looks like there's only 1 lane on approach although there's apace for two vehicles side by side at the very end. How did you manage to overtake a long line of traffic without going into the hatchings?


Rawhide66

Original Poster:

47 posts

174 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
JamesRF said:
At the speed you were going and how committed you were to the left turn I would suggest you wouldn’t have been able to avoid the car had it decided to change its course. You took a bit of a gamble to skip the queue and hoped the roundabout was clear for you to carry the speed onto it. It ultimately paid off for you.

It’s the sort of thing we all see multiple times a day and other than someone capturing it on their dashcam for a YouTube compilation and maybe feeling aggrieved that you got ahead of them, it’s forgotten about rather quickly.

Did you commit an awful crime? No you didn’t.

Would you have done that with a police car sitting in the queue? You already know the answer smile
She’s put it on Twitter and tagged the police apparently..I’m expecting a T-pac hard stop any day now.

Rawhide66

Original Poster:

47 posts

174 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Countdown said:
Just had a look at the Google Streetview and it looks like there's only 1 lane on approach although there's apace for two vehicles side by side at the very end. How did you manage to overtake a long line of traffic without going into the hatchings?

Because the road has been made into a dual carriageway since the google van went round.

A quick look at the google satellite image above will confirm this.

10126 Torino

4,543 posts

85 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
NEVER do anything even slightly controversial in a company liveried vehicle , your employer will get to hear about it.

I had this too , before everyone had a camera running .

monthou

4,832 posts

56 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
If there are 2 lanes on the exit and no arrows on the entry lanes then surely you can approach from either lane.
Guilty of taking the piss. Extra points for doing it in a white van.

bearman68

4,766 posts

138 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Doesn't look a safe and considerate move to me. I understand there is no straight ahead option, but it wouldn't have needed much to go wrong, and at the speed you appear to be going, there would be no options. Also, after you have turned left, you are required to filter into the a single lane, which would require some luck, or aggression.

This is not to say I am an expert on the highway code, or even a mediocre driver, but that's how it looks to me.

Mind you, I don't think I would have been bothered to post on youtube either.

Glosphil

4,473 posts

240 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Rawhide66 said:
Someone has made a complaint about my driving.
They’ve captured on dash cam, put it on YouTube and emailed the link to work.

The back story is that the lead car at the island in lane 1 was not moving anywhere. A queue had developed with about 15 cars in and I came up the right hand lane to the island and turned left.

There is just left or right at this particular island, there is no straight on.
There are also 2 lanes in and 2 lanes out.
So there is little possibility for a conflict of interests in this particular instance.
That’s said, I was watching and in the event someone was going right from lane 1 I’d have just simply go round with them, done a 450° turn and carried on my way.

So I would argue that what I did was not dangerous and if it was, then to whom?
I would also argue it’s not even discourteous, as no one was impacted by this manoeuvre in any way. No one had to brake and no one swerved.

Despite driving a white van as part of my job, I don’t tailgate, I treat pedestrians, horse riders and cyclists with the upmost courtesy and respect and I don’t lose it with learners and always come down to 30 by the time I’ve entered a 30. So not completely irresponsible.

The incident occurred where the A41 is met by the A518.
https://goo.gl/maps/i1iiQbXn9oxJRgFK6
I am travelling along the A518 approaching the island having come from Telford.

As I said I take my driving very seriously, I will take on board any comments with a view to self improvement. Accordingly, I now put myself on trial, but before people whose skills and experience I value.

However, I would stress I am aware of the Highway Code and what it says about lane choice...
I am also aware lane choice is advisory and not mandatory.
And as I said, I’m only using lane2 because 10 or more cars are sat in lane 1 doing nothing,
whilst lane 2 is doing nothing.

I don’t slow for the island because I can see the way ahead and to my right is clear.

Here is a link to the clip

https://youtu.be/V-MkwakCLIs


Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 10:49


Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 10:50


Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 10:51


Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 11:00
Why would you go 1-1/4 times around the roundabout? I think you mean a 270 turn. A 450 would have you turning right.

I would have considered the 270 turn but not your approach.

Rawhide66

Original Poster:

47 posts

174 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Left

Enter at 6 o’clock, go ALL the way round, (360) leave at 9 o’clock (plus another90)

Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 12:12

Pica-Pica

14,353 posts

90 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Rawhide66 said:
Pica-Pica said:
Not something I would do, plus how soon the exit lane narrows from two to one, we don’t know, but it does, as the sign shows.
To make the manoeuvre you did, you must be familiar with the layout, perhaps too familiar. The front vehicle is not indicating left (although it does go left) and you were not in a position to see it’s left indicator, even if it was going left. It could well have gone straight on.
Too many possibilities of conflict for my liking.
I did say in the text straight on isn’t an option and if I turned left then I could have turned right so I could have avoided an unexpected manoeuvre that I was already expecting.

You skipped the main course and gone straight for pudding...



The filter lane is about 400 metres long. If it was a little short one that would have just been too rude.

Edited by Rawhide66 on Sunday 11th July 11:38
Still too many possibilities for conflict. You did welcome opinions, that’s mine.

Glenn63

3,065 posts

90 months

Sunday 11th July 2021
quotequote all
Tbh if you had just been pottering up and did that move I doubt there would have been an issue I think it’s the speed that’s triggered them. I’m personally in the mind of it is fast and maybe a bit cheeky if most people are left lane left, right lane right but also in the camp of thank fk some people get a move on when it’s blatantly clear and not fking about causing unnecessary ques.