Pelican Crossing Problem

Pelican Crossing Problem

Author
Discussion

BeastMaster

Original Poster:

443 posts

193 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
Not sure of the above title but have a pedestrian crossing with traffic lights close to my home, the problem is that a lot of the time cars are queing in one direction across the crossing.

When the lights are green, but I am unable to clear the crossing because a car is stopped on the other side I aways stop keeping the crossing clear in case the lights change.

Several times now when I have done this, a pedestrian will just set off across the road believing the lights have now changed and very nearly got run down by a car coming the other way

I can't think of anything that I could do apart from warning the pedestrian with my horn of the approaching car, to which I have been subjected to a mouthfull of abuse, but better this than watching someone get mowed down.

Just to add that the problem has got a lot worse because many people are now texting or emailing from their phones.

It helps a little if I am able to stop a full car length from the crossing, but any further tips or advise to take the stress out would be most welcome.

Andy

ScoobyChris

1,782 posts

208 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
Ultimately the decision to cross is with the pedestrian and they'll know whether the lights have changed by the colour of the illuminated man. Round where I live, pedestrians still decide to cross even if cars are sat across the crossing so I'm not sure even blocking their path would deter them.

Chris

R0G

4,997 posts

161 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
Using the horn is the correct thing to do if there is an imminent danger - ignore those that give you attitude for doing it

Using the horn to stop them walking in the road is not allowed



Edited by R0G on Wednesday 25th January 14:49

ScoobyChris

1,782 posts

208 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
R0G said:
Using the horn is the correct thing to do if there is an imminent danger
Although the last thing you want them to do is be distracted by your horn and be looking away from the source of imminent danger! biggrin

Chris

simoid

19,772 posts

164 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
ScoobyChris said:
...so I'm not sure even blocking their path would deter them.
It would slow them down, however, and hopefully remove them from 'iPed' state or whatever it is!

ScoobyChris

1,782 posts

208 months

Wednesday 25th January 2012
quotequote all
simoid said:
It would slow them down, however, and hopefully remove them from 'iPed' state or whatever it is!
That's true - would just have to be careful not to hide them from approaching cars...

Chris

kaf

323 posts

153 months

Thursday 26th January 2012
quotequote all
You are obliged by law to keep the crossing area clear, pedestrians need to take account of their own safety, not your fault if they can't be bothered.

Lemans Party

558 posts

161 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
It's natural selection at work, don't worry about it.

Vaux

1,557 posts

222 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
kaf said:
You are obliged by law to keep the crossing area clear, pedestrians need to take account of their own safety, not your fault if they can't be bothered.
Yet HC 192 says "you should keep the crossing clear", not MUST.

7mike

3,075 posts

199 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
R0G said:
Using the horn is the correct thing to do if there is an imminent danger - ignore those that give you attitude for doing it

Using the horn to stop them walking in the road is not allowed



Edited by R0G on Wednesday 25th January 14:49
How does warning pedestrians of your presence improve the situation? If they are stepping out from the left then they are going to look right when you sound the horn, presumably the danger is coming from their left?

If, as you say, using the horn is THE correct action to take, what's the difference between warning them once they have stepped into the road and warning them if they are about to step into the road ? "Using the horn to stop them walking in the road is not allowed".

Perhaps the words 'may be appropriate' rather than trying to asert your opinion as 'the correct thing to do' & 'X is not allowed' would give your opinions more credibility.

As a former trucker, you'll know we often have to stop at the crossing even though there will be space for a car or two the other side, but not enough for a long vehicle. How did you manage to warn the sleepy pedestrian who stepped out then?

R0G

4,997 posts

161 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
Mike - did you miss the word imminent in what you quoted?

I never suggested hooting if they walked in the road - only if they were about to get hit!!

kaf

323 posts

153 months

Friday 27th January 2012
quotequote all
Vaux said:
kaf said:
You are obliged by law to keep the crossing area clear, pedestrians need to take account of their own safety, not your fault if they can't be bothered.
Yet HC 192 says "you should keep the crossing clear", not MUST.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/2400/regulation/18/made

Prohibition against the stopping of vehicles on crossings

18. The driver of a vehicle shall not cause the vehicle or any part of it to stop within the limits of a crossing unless he is prevented from proceeding by circumstances beyond his control or it is necessary for him to stop to avoid injury or damage to persons or property.

Zeeky

2,925 posts

218 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/2400/regulation/2...

Prohibition against the stopping of vehicles in controlled areas

20...

(2) Except as provided in regulations 21 and 22 the driver of a vehicle shall not cause it or any part of it to stop in a controlled area.

Exceptions to regulation 20

21. Regulation 20 does not prohibit the driver of a vehicle from stopping it in a controlled area—


(b)if the driver is prevented from proceeding by circumstances beyond his control or it is necessary for him to stop to avoid injury or damage to persons or property;...




If the law obliges you not to stop on the crossing in queuing traffic it also obliges you not to stop in the controlled area in queuing traffic. Unless you can find an exemption other than "circumstances beyond his control".

Keeping the crossing clear but not the controlled area doesn't put you in a legally different position as far as the regulations are concerned.



davepoth

29,395 posts

205 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
Blocking the junction to stop the numpty from crossing the road could be an exemption there? biggrin

7mike

3,075 posts

199 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
R0G said:
Mike - did you miss the word imminent in what you quoted?

I never suggested hooting if they walked in the road - only if they were about to get hit!!
No Rog, I didn't miss the word imminent, and I'd still like to know how getting a pedestrian to look the wrong way if clearly they've missed the danger coming from the other direction is going to help?

More importantly, as per my last question above, how did you get on driving LGVs and leaving crossings clear? I remember having an awkward situation during my test years ago in Carlisle. Traffic ahead moved off a couple of car lengths but of course I had to leave the crossing clear. Then a whole flock of shoppers decided it must be ok to go whilst traffic was approaching from the other direction. I can't see me using the horn would have made the situation any safer if there had been immenent danger from either fast moving traffic coming in the opposite direction or motorbikes coming up the side? Perhaps, having the window open ready to shout a warning MAY be appropriate, just as using the horn MAY be appropriate. Personaly, I try to avoid stating what THE right or wrong course of action is.

R0G

4,997 posts

161 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
7mike said:
No Rog, I didn't miss the word imminent, and I'd still like to know how getting a pedestrian to look the wrong way if clearly they've missed the danger coming from the other direction is going to help?

More importantly, as per my last question above, how did you get on driving LGVs and leaving crossings clear? I remember having an awkward situation during my test years ago in Carlisle. Traffic ahead moved off a couple of car lengths but of course I had to leave the crossing clear. Then a whole flock of shoppers decided it must be ok to go whilst traffic was approaching from the other direction. I can't see me using the horn would have made the situation any safer if there had been immenent danger from either fast moving traffic coming in the opposite direction or motorbikes coming up the side? Perhaps, having the window open ready to shout a warning MAY be appropriate, just as using the horn MAY be appropriate. Personaly, I try to avoid stating what THE right or wrong course of action is.
BLAST the horn and pedestrians tend to stop where they are - it may also acct as a warning to the driver about to hit them

LGVs and keeping xings clear - no problem except where the xing is less than the vehicle length from perhaps a give way line

Using a horn in LGV in the situation you describe - I have done it and it saved a pedestrian from getting seriously injured or killed - so it works

Vaux

1,557 posts

222 months

Saturday 28th January 2012
quotequote all
Zeeky said:
If the law obliges you not to stop on the crossing in queuing traffic it also obliges you not to stop in the controlled area in queuing traffic. Unless you can find an exemption other than "circumstances beyond his control".

Keeping the crossing clear but not the controlled area doesn't put you in a legally different position as far as the regulations are concerned.
But HC 192 shows a drawing of cars stopped in the controlled area, with a big green tick against it, and a car stopped on the crossing with a big red X.
Tricky stuff.

Zeeky

2,925 posts

218 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
Which leads me to believe the authors dont't believe that the prohibition of vehicles stopping applies when queuing either in the controlled area or on the crossing. No "must not". Despite this they chose to create an additional rule of 'should not' for not not stopping on the crossing when queuing.


R0G

4,997 posts

161 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
There is no offence committed for stopping when queueing on zigzags

Vaux

1,557 posts

222 months

Sunday 29th January 2012
quotequote all
R0G said:
There is no offence committed for stopping when queueing on zigzags
What exemption are you using? "circumstances beyond his control"?
Say there's a set of traffic lights 50 yards past the crossing. Lights turn red, traffic starts to queue back towards the crossing.
As you approach, the far side of the crossing is full of stopped vehicles.
Do you decide to stop just before the crossing itself, or just before the zig zags (part of the "controlled area") on approach? You are in control of where you stop in this situation, so, you should leave the zig zags clear?
("You" means everyone, not just ROG!)