Leaner drivers and commentary.

Leaner drivers and commentary.

Author
Discussion

KardioKate

Original Poster:

1,584 posts

160 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
One of my father's friends has an 18 year old lad. He's been learning to drive for a year now and just doesn't seem to be 'getting' it. The lad isn't an overly confident chap anyway and was seriously thinking about giving up a few months ago.

So my father (both he and I are senior observers, although he has been for much longer than me!) offered to take him out and see if he could help build his confidence between lessons. I tagged along and true to his father's word, the lad's driving was appalling. It dawned on my father when we were back at home talking that the lad had NO idea about what actually happens to make a car go. For example, he knew the results of raising the clutch, but didn't know how it worked.

So firstly we talked him through what actually happens to the car as you drive and use the various controls. This gave him somewhat of a basic understanding, although didn't really seem to improve his driving. Not really knowing what else to try, my father asked him to tell him what he was doing as he was driving along: sort of a simplified commentary. As we explained the things he had to look out for, and that every action when driving is a reaction to something else he began to increase his commentary of his own accord, and within days his driving was becoming much more confident, and he was judging stops much better.

Anyway, he passed his test today. With 0 minor faults. He really feels that the single thing that helped him most with his driving was giving a commentary.

Should this be something that is required for the DSA test?

Hooli

32,278 posts

206 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
KardioKate said:
Should this be something that is required for the DSA test?
Only if you want safe roads with drivers who can think what to do next. Our system is based on idiots blindly following signs & not thinking at all.

R0G

4,997 posts

161 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
Many drivers, even experienced ones, find commentary difficult for many reasons which is why the IAM does not insist on it

For those that can do and are comfortable with it - great!!

Us observers HAVE to do it


BertBert

19,539 posts

217 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
That's just dumbing down. It's one of the best learning/teching tools I know!
Bert

WhoseGeneration

4,090 posts

213 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
It's a good idea, I think we need "Leaner drivers", obesity is becoming a great problem.
Commentary upon diet might help. smile
However, regarding learner drivers, yes, of course, that would require ADIs to be able to demonstrate it though.
It's about not being on "auto pilot", that there are thought processes involved in every decision.

Baryonyx

18,062 posts

165 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
Commentary cna be a great tool but it can also be a bad idea if it's introduced too soon or too much emphasis is placed on it. I think of it as having a pound to spend on your drive. At first, commentary might want 80p of that £1, leaving you with 20p to work the controls with and do everything else. Eventually, it'll only cost you 1p...but thats once you're comfortable with it and more importantly, comfortable with everything else you're doing.

simoid

19,772 posts

164 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
Commentary cna be a great tool but it can also be a bad idea if it's introduced too soon or too much emphasis is placed on it. I think of it as having a pound to spend on your drive. At first, commentary might want 80p of that £1, leaving you with 20p to work the controls with and do everything else. Eventually, it'll only cost you 1p...but thats once you're comfortable with it and more importantly, comfortable with everything else you're doing.
So you won't be able to commentate 'til you can drive confidently/comfortably, and you won't be able to take your test 'til you can drive confidently/comfortably.

Shouldn't be a problem with commentating on your test then smile

roachcoach

3,975 posts

161 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Hooli said:
KardioKate said:
Should this be something that is required for the DSA test?
Only if you want safe roads with drivers who can think what to do next. Our system is based on idiots blindly following signs & not thinking at all.
It would make me massively uncomfortable I think. I get really rather nervous 'speaking out loud' e.g. presentations, speeches and the like and I know this is not the same, but it is close enough in my head that I am absolutely certain I'd make a right james hunt of it.

Christ the very thought makes me shiver at me desk!

Vaux

1,557 posts

222 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
roachcoach said:
It would make me massively uncomfortable I think. I get really rather nervous 'speaking out loud' e.g. presentations, speeches and the like and I know this is not the same, but it is close enough in my head that I am absolutely certain I'd make a right james hunt of it.

Christ the very thought makes me shiver at me desk!
With practice and training though you would become more confident, as you would have done with driving itself. What would be a better test of a driver's hazard perception skills - watching 14 video clips and learning how to click at the right time, or actually telling the Examiner what you see/expect and what you're going to do about it?
Some people have a really hard time passing the HP part of the Theory Test and might prefer to do a commentary? It's not so easy to assess as the computer game though!

roachcoach

3,975 posts

161 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Not really, I've had to do many times over the years for work, it doesn't settle down much. It's less obvious to others how shakey I am now but inside I'm still dying in a flame and making idiot mistakes - and that's talking about stuff I've forgotten more about than most will ever know.

Thankfully I've moved away from needing to do that sort of things more lately.


But doing that, as a learner? No thanks. Hell it would make me drive very badly even today. I can do it in my head, have done before out of interest but speaking out loud? No. Calling it a phobia is ludicrous, but it causes a similar involuntary and completely irrational reaction in me.

I only mention it since I'm probably not alone (although I kind of hope so, because it fking SUCKS)

R0G

4,997 posts

161 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Vaux said:
With practice and training though you would become more confident, as you would have done with driving itself. What would be a better test of a driver's hazard perception skills - watching 14 video clips and learning how to click at the right time, or actually telling the Examiner what you see/expect and what you're going to do about it?
Some people have a really hard time passing the HP part of the Theory Test and might prefer to do a commentary? It's not so easy to assess as the computer game though!
I cannot do the HPT as I have a problem with trying to see 3D images on a 2D screen
I have a very thick file where my MP has corresponded with the DfT/DSA in trying to get my advanced driving hazard perceptions as an alternative - the DSA are intransigent and will not allow it

So driving and commentating on hazards with a ex/police traffic examiner is not allowed to usurp the DSA HPT
Not logical is it?

Hooli

32,278 posts

206 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
roachcoach said:
Hooli said:
KardioKate said:
Should this be something that is required for the DSA test?
Only if you want safe roads with drivers who can think what to do next. Our system is based on idiots blindly following signs & not thinking at all.
It would make me massively uncomfortable I think. I get really rather nervous 'speaking out loud' e.g. presentations, speeches and the like and I know this is not the same, but it is close enough in my head that I am absolutely certain I'd make a right james hunt of it.

Christ the very thought makes me shiver at me desk!
TBH I'd hate the idea too for much the same reasons. It would however force the instructors to teach people drive properly rather than learning by rote how to pass their test.

roachcoach

3,975 posts

161 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Hooli said:
roachcoach said:
Hooli said:
KardioKate said:
Should this be something that is required for the DSA test?
Only if you want safe roads with drivers who can think what to do next. Our system is based on idiots blindly following signs & not thinking at all.
It would make me massively uncomfortable I think. I get really rather nervous 'speaking out loud' e.g. presentations, speeches and the like and I know this is not the same, but it is close enough in my head that I am absolutely certain I'd make a right james hunt of it.

Christ the very thought makes me shiver at me desk!
TBH I'd hate the idea too for much the same reasons. It would however force the instructors to teach people drive properly rather than learning by rote how to pass their test.
There's probably a good bit of mileage (no pun) in having instructors call out hazards and things to consider - if only to get people thinking that way.

Hooli

32,278 posts

206 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
Or decent debriefing after a period of driving, with questions about the hazards seen & if the pupil saw them/allowed for them. Rather like in the little be of advanced training I've done really.

Bacon Is Proof

5,740 posts

237 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
My instructor gave me a proper commentated run and it was probably the single most helpful thing he did, really opened my eyes to what being a good driver requires.

BertBert

19,539 posts

217 months

Friday 19th August 2011
quotequote all
I understand where you are on both topics. And I absolutely know that you can do both well. Having been involved in teaching shy 14 year olds to do a commentary as well as terrified business people to do presentations, I have seen people who would rather have sharp sticks poked in their eyes do both to great effect without wanting to die!

Quite simply if you can have a conversation with a friend, you are set!
Bert



roachcoach said:
Not really, I've had to do many times over the years for work, it doesn't settle down much. It's less obvious to others how shakey I am now but inside I'm still dying in a flame and making idiot mistakes - and that's talking about stuff I've forgotten more about than most will ever know.

Thankfully I've moved away from needing to do that sort of things more lately.


But doing that, as a learner? No thanks. Hell it would make me drive very badly even today. I can do it in my head, have done before out of interest but speaking out loud? No. Calling it a phobia is ludicrous, but it causes a similar involuntary and completely irrational reaction in me.

I only mention it since I'm probably not alone (although I kind of hope so, because it fking SUCKS)

davepoth

29,395 posts

205 months

Sunday 21st August 2011
quotequote all
I commentate on hazards up ahead; "look at that prat" is quite common.

R0G

4,997 posts

161 months

Sunday 21st August 2011
quotequote all
davepoth said:
I commentate on hazards up ahead; "look at that prat" is quite common.
Better still ..... I know what that numpty is likely to do any minute

T0nup

683 posts

206 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
Had to give commentary while training many, many years ago for a deffensive and evasive driving course. We had to learn a list of standardised phrases, and this helped to save response times and took out a lot of the randomness of commentary you gave. Also, at speed, the body is faster to react and respond than the brain and the gob, so without rehersed commentary, the hazard you are commenting on is behind you.

But thank God we didn't have to do that too much. Very stressfull.

Dan

Cunning Punt

486 posts

159 months

Tuesday 1st November 2011
quotequote all
T0nup said:
Had to give commentary while training many, many years ago for a deffensive and evasive driving course. We had to learn a list of standardised phrases, and this helped to save response times and took out a lot of the randomness of commentary you gave. Also, at speed, the body is faster to react and respond than the brain and the gob, so without rehersed commentary, the hazard you are commenting on is behind you.
Would you be able to reproduce that list - even partially - here for our benefit?

I've been trying to practise commentary after learning about it here (thank you PH), and while I certainly feel my observation has improved, my current problem is that I can't seem to easily recall phrases for things, without spending more of Baryonyx's £1 of concentration than I'm comfortable with. Maybe it's just something that comes with practice.

Actually, now I think about it, I've never felt comfortable about talking while driving, full stop.
Perhaps I should start a new thread on that.

'punt