How do people downshift for more power without rev-matching?

How do people downshift for more power without rev-matching?

Author
Discussion

Doofus

26,606 posts

176 months

Is it just me who thinks this is a weird thread?

Glenn63

2,924 posts

87 months

I’m assuming the OP means using the cars momentum and engine to bring the revs up, rather than using the throttle to do it yourself whilst in neutral, would cause a slowing of the vehicle, which to a degree is correct but it would be so minimal and the fact your back on the power straight away in a lower gear you would quickly gain back the lost 1mph.

EmailAddress

12,522 posts

221 months

Maybe you need a slightly newer car OP...


Discendo Discimus

414 posts

35 months

DarkVeil said:
Discendo Discimus said:
But that's why you would be back on the throttle as soon as the clutch is lifted, because you're trying to accelerate.
Obviously if you downshifted, lifted the clutch and coasted it would slow down, but that's not what anybody does.
So there isn't any significant engine-braking when lifting up the clutch?
Christ...

Not if you're on the throttle as soon as the clutch is lifted. If you lift the clutch and don't touch the throttle then yes, there will be considerable engine braking.
Why don't you go out and try it? I assume you've got a manual if you're over-thinking it this much.

Actually reminds me of an ex who couldn't grasp the concept of engine braking. She would come down a gear then hit the throttle, and couldn't understand why the car was speeding up. I had to show her about 8 times before she finally understood.

BenS94

2,126 posts

27 months

I always rev match. Something I picked up in driving older knackered cars with dodgy clutches/synchros and it's a habit I've kept as it seems more mechanically sympathetic.

DarkVeil

Original Poster:

77 posts

20 months

Glenn63 said:
I’m assuming the OP means using the cars momentum and engine to bring the revs up, rather than using the throttle to do it yourself whilst in neutral, would cause a slowing of the vehicle, which to a degree is correct but it would be so minimal and the fact your back on the power straight away in a lower gear you would quickly gain back the lost 1mph.
Yes, exactly

DarkVeil

Original Poster:

77 posts

20 months

BenS94 said:
I always rev match. Something I picked up in driving older knackered cars with dodgy clutches/synchros and it's a habit I've kept as it seems more mechanically sympathetic.
Yes, even in cars with good clutches and sychros it feels much more mechanically sympathetic. I learnt to rev-match not long after passing my test and since then very rarely downshift without it.

DarkVeil

Original Poster:

77 posts

20 months

EmailAddress said:
Maybe you need a slightly newer car OP...

I drive a 987

DarkVeil

Original Poster:

77 posts

20 months

Discendo Discimus said:
DarkVeil said:
Discendo Discimus said:
But that's why you would be back on the throttle as soon as the clutch is lifted, because you're trying to accelerate.
Obviously if you downshifted, lifted the clutch and coasted it would slow down, but that's not what anybody does.
So there isn't any significant engine-braking when lifting up the clutch?
Christ...

Not if you're on the throttle as soon as the clutch is lifted. If you lift the clutch and don't touch the throttle then yes, there will be considerable engine braking.
Why don't you go out and try it? I assume you've got a manual if you're over-thinking it this much.

Actually reminds me of an ex who couldn't grasp the concept of engine braking. She would come down a gear then hit the throttle, and couldn't understand why the car was speeding up. I had to show her about 8 times before she finally understood.
Oh okay. I thought you meant be on throttle as soon as the clutch is fully engaged, but now I understand that you mean to apply throttle input while lifting the clutch.

Lester H

2,797 posts

108 months

ARHarh said:
I am not sure rev matching has been necessary since the introduction of the synchromesh gearbox. I could be wrong though.
You are right, of course. But a sympathetic driver, even when in a hurry will also up the revs to assist the synchro and increase the life of the gearbox. It used to be called car sympathy.

Arrivalist

108 posts

2 months

Lester H said:
ARHarh said:
I am not sure rev matching has been necessary since the introduction of the synchromesh gearbox. I could be wrong though.
You are right, of course. But a sympathetic driver, even when in a hurry will also up the revs to assist the synchro and increase the life of the gearbox. It used to be called car sympathy.
Mechanical sympathy- a long lost art.

I was on a McLaren dealer driving day (roads, not track) a few years back with a 570 spider and a 720. In the 570 I was on a dual carriageway and told to ‘go for it’.

Even though the gear changes are paddle shift, I always lifted off the accelerator between shifts to make the change smoother. The instructor was impressed that I wanted to look after the car but told me in no uncertain terms that these were McLaren’s cars and were intended to be abused.

After that I just flicked the paddle with foot firmly on the throttle. It was a fun ride but the jolts between gear changes never fully sat comfortably with my mechanically sympathetic nature.

GT9

7,111 posts

175 months

Doofus said:
Is it just me who thinks this is a weird thread?
No.
Quite funny it's now been moved to the advanced driving sub-forum.
Who says mods don't do humour.

cuprabob

14,993 posts

217 months

DarkVeil said:
How does the average driver avoid this loss of momentum when downshifting?
Can we assume you classify yourself as an "above average" driver? smile

DarkVeil

Original Poster:

77 posts

20 months

Not sure why half the posts in the thread are slightly hostile

BenS94

2,126 posts

27 months

DarkVeil said:
Not sure why half the posts in the thread are slightly hostile
Because PistonHeads

MrBen.911

523 posts

121 months

Noting you drive a 987, I have a 986 and a 996. I rev match sometimes because it makes a nice sound, but in reality it makes no difference from a performance perspective, possibly it does from a mechanical sympathy perspective when grabbing a low gear whilst slowing hard for a tight bend etc. When driving more everyday manuals, such as small hatchbacks, there's definitely no point and it makes no difference at all in everyday driving.

Gary C

12,732 posts

182 months

Funny how rev matching is being treated with distain while Toe & Heel isn't...

I will normally bring the revs up while changing down, even if braking at the same time, its smoother.

but, just changing down without it isn't a big problem OP.

John D.

18,120 posts

212 months

BenS94 said:
DarkVeil said:
Not sure why half the posts in the thread are slightly hostile
Because PistonHeads
Stupid question, stupid answer.

BenS94

2,126 posts

27 months

John D. said:
BenS94 said:
DarkVeil said:
Not sure why half the posts in the thread are slightly hostile
Because PistonHeads
Stupid question, stupid answer.
Point proven. PistonHeads members often seek to belittle others and take the piss for no real reason, other than to make themselves look better. A bit pathetic, really. We're all enthusiasts, we all have opinions which we share or we don't (such is life) but a lot of members operate on a my way or no way basis.

popeyewhite

20,335 posts

123 months

You don't need to rev match, and if you did in the situation you describe you probably still wouldn't be in the powerband.