Sat Nav verus my Speedo

Author
Discussion

10210ken

Original Poster:

212 posts

247 months

Saturday 22nd October 2005
quotequote all
I have had two different sat navs in three cars in every case the speed on the sat nav is about 5mph out compared to the speedo at about 80 mph. Which one is correct. THe speedo is the one which has the higher reading

Ken

Phil Dicky

7,165 posts

270 months

Saturday 22nd October 2005
quotequote all
10210ken said:
I have had two different sat navs in three cars in every case the speed on the sat nav is about 5mph out compared to the speedo at about 80 mph. Which one is correct. THe speedo is the one which has the higher reading

Ken


Sat Nav will be right speedos are always out ranging form 5-10%

Phil

droopsnoot

12,660 posts

249 months

Monday 24th October 2005
quotequote all
SatNav is much more accurate at steady speeds. Under hard acceleration it can take some time for the GPS speed to 'catch up' as most commercial GPS receivers only send out updated data every second or two.

bigdods

7,175 posts

234 months

Thursday 10th November 2005
quotequote all
GPS is the one to watch. Had my TVR tested for speedo accuracy on a rolling road - 100% accurate (yes I was surprised!) then checked TVR against SatNav at 30 and 60 both speedo and satnav agreed on the speed. Checked My Omega and Golf against Satnav both cars were over reading by a few percent as I would expect.

arh

1,222 posts

246 months

Thursday 10th November 2005
quotequote all
The construction rules for cars say something along the lines of "a speedo must never read slower than the car is actualy traveling", therefore all speedos are built with a tolerence, normally 10%.

kiticat0099

3 posts

235 months

Monday 14th November 2005
quotequote all
I've tested the Road Angel against a Volvo V70, found the Volvo read 10% over against Road ANGEL; also tested against Seat Alhambra and was spot on.