Bring on the trumpets (air delivery question)

Bring on the trumpets (air delivery question)

Author
Discussion

nightSpirit

Original Poster:

1,057 posts

174 months

Thursday 11th November 2010
quotequote all
I've had the idea for some time to upgrade the stock airbox but wanted to try something different. I could go down the route of the ACT carbon airbox at a cost of ~1k and I'm sure that will be great but I like to tweak and modify things and would like a bespoke solution.

The route I've decided upon is to fit a cold air duct to the front bumper (Tamora) with neoprene ducting to a Reverie 6 cyl carbon air chamber that houses 6 individually filtered carbon trumpets.

I'd like to point out that this isn't a 'I want 8 billion horse power' etc...it's more about making something different.

Has anyone done this or have any thoughts on it? I'm sure that the car will not lose power with this installation and will infact be getting a much better source of air that is cold rather than the hot, ill fitting stock airbox. I thought on the trumpet front I would fit trumpets that matched the stock airbox length and diameter (much like the ACT item) to be safe as playing with trumpet length etc can have an impact (not always positive) on an engine.

dvs_dave

8,980 posts

231 months

Thursday 11th November 2010
quotequote all
I've often wondered about this but have thought that with individual trumpet filters you would probably end up with a lower overall filter area than standard which isn't ideal.

With the standard airbox, it fits fairly well around the TB's, it's just where it joins the lower half around the filter it's a bit rubbish. I reckon that modifying the upper half so that the filter slots in and fits well into that would be a good option?

Alternatively, ditch the panel filter, seal the two halfs of the air box together and stick a cone filter on the bottom with a cold air feed from the front.

One thing you might want to try is driving around with a laptop connected up to the ECU and recording the inlet temps before and after your mods.

Interested to see how you get on.

nightSpirit

Original Poster:

1,057 posts

174 months

Thursday 11th November 2010
quotequote all
Inlet temps could be measured using the data display on the dash?

I also thought of the cone filter (only on the front) with a cold air feed but decided I would need to shield it really from the engine temps which would add to the job.

I've never really given much attention to n/a before coming from turbo tuning but I'll be sure to post up what I do and how I've done it.

Mark

dvs_dave

8,980 posts

231 months

Thursday 11th November 2010
quotequote all
I don't think you can monitor the inlet temp from the instrument pod (well you can't on the Tuscan), you have to connect the ECU up to a laptop running the TVR diagnostic software which has realtime data logging, including inlet air temp.

In all honesty though and from work done by others, the airbox is actually pretty well designed and when on the move hot inlet air isn't a particular problem. The airbox and inlet is well away from the heat of the exhausts and radiator, and being made from plastic, it isn't really susceptible to heat soak either. IMHO the only areas where it needs improvement is the join between the two halfs where the filter goes, and perhaps the throttle body/trumpet interface.

nightSpirit

Original Poster:

1,057 posts

174 months

Thursday 11th November 2010
quotequote all
Thanks Dave,

whether my Tam is a 'Wheeler special' I don't know but the instrument pod has realtime air inlet temp on it smile

Will post what I get up to.

plasticman

901 posts

257 months

Saturday 13th November 2010
quotequote all
I think you will get more power from the fact you are not drawing air from the venturi effect created under the moving car . It would be intersting to see the presure drop (if any) there is in the lower part of the airbox with the car at different speeds. David

dvs_dave

8,980 posts

231 months

Sunday 14th November 2010
quotequote all
It would be interesting to see if there is any significant pressure drop at speed, however I suspect that as the car isn't flat bottomed, the airflow under the front end is highly turbulent so the pressure may actually increase slightly?

clive f

7,250 posts

239 months

Sunday 14th November 2010
quotequote all
interesting topic, I considered exactly the same thing a while ago, but decided to stay with the standard set up which I believe works very well, one thing that may help is at the bottom of the inlet pipe where it connects to the sump tray, why not fit a plate about an inch in depth just behind the hole in the tray pointing down towards the floor, this may have the same effect as a front splitter used on the griff and chims to cause turbulance in the airflow going under the car be directed up into the radiator, except in this case it may help force air up into the intake hole.

nrick

1,866 posts

169 months

Sunday 14th November 2010
quotequote all
Took the bonnet off the Tuscan the other day and found 6 individual trumpets, and an injector tie wrapped to one (cold start?) Will post a picture when I take the bonnet of next, maybe tomorrow. I am also looking at throwing it on a dyno to establish a baseline as I have no history on the car/engine.

Thanks

N

nightSpirit

Original Poster:

1,057 posts

174 months

Sunday 14th November 2010
quotequote all
Rick it would be great to see your engine, although unfiltered trumpets is a quick way to a dead engine (or so it's widely believed on road cars).

I used the same 'scoop' technique to pull air from the underside of the car on my old MR2. The intercooler was mounted in the boot lying flat, the under floor was a huge scoop to drag air through it and the top of the bootlid was reverse vented to allow the air out...worked very well.

I'm thinking of 45ish deg silicone pipe with trumpets and an airbox at the moment, off to see Reverie in a few weeks so will know more then.

nrick

1,866 posts

169 months

Sunday 14th November 2010
quotequote all
Sorry left out the word 'filters', should have read 'individual trumpet filters'.

Running the engine without filters will kill the engine. The other debate is over the validity of dyno figures over 'on the road figures', on GP bikes we used a flexible inlet trumpet under the front fairing that squashed when the bike tipped in for the corner, but had a bigger cross sectional area when on the straight. Although we couldn't prove it on a dyno, the 'ram-air' effect was noticeable by the rider and sector times.

Will take the photo tomorrow.

nightSpirit

Original Poster:

1,057 posts

174 months

Monday 15th November 2010
quotequote all
Great Rick..sounds like an interesting engine smile

Live mapping on the road is always preferrable although not always practical.

I had a car mapped a few years back to 448hp on the dyno, on the road in use dependant on weather it was knocking like a bd so had it remapped to 380hp with little knock. Dyno for pub bragging, live mapping for real world driving.

nrick

1,866 posts

169 months

Monday 15th November 2010
quotequote all
Totally agree, live mapping is king.

dpd3047

250 posts

172 months

Wednesday 17th November 2010
quotequote all
When are you going to post the pictures of your engine bay.

Edited by dpd3047 on Wednesday 17th November 21:08

nrick

1,866 posts

169 months

Wednesday 17th November 2010
quotequote all
Sorry having too much fun driving it, will try on Friday. Good Bump though.

nightSpirit

Original Poster:

1,057 posts

174 months

Wednesday 17th November 2010
quotequote all
Yeah...come on wink

nrick

1,866 posts

169 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all






Hi

So here they are, took the bonnet off on my own for you, took the pictures and then did the only thing and took it for a drive to Gloucester....

Did think about photographing a paper with it in case you didn't believe me.

N

nightSpirit

Original Poster:

1,057 posts

174 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
I believe you, just wanted to see the installation.

That's very interesting...they look like KN or similar filters straight onto the throttle bodies. On the plus it'll sound good under load but on the negative side unless you've got air getting to them they'll possibly draw in hot air?

I love the air temp sensor tied to the filter smile

On the strength of your pics I'm even more keen to give this a go. I'm a bit caught up at the moment trying to remove the rear silencers for another idea!

nrick

1,866 posts

169 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
Not sure if you can see it but the air scoop is still in place, about 4" pipe so there should be plenty of cold air, and it does sound great under load. Took it for a ride tonight and at 4deg C it was fun fun fun. It wasn't my work, I bought it like that and haven't dyno'd it yet.

Interested in the silencers, for some reason i unhooked both hanger rubbers (the wheelarch ones) today, once getting it out of the garage and once in the mother of all pot holes. The exhaust hangs really low and is not centered, so I was considering a stainless custom job without the silencers or at least relocated. I am not keen on the fact that the silencers aren't supported and it is the 3rd time I have unhooked the wheelarch rubbers. I haven't had it on a ramp yet so will need to have a look at it. I have some software for exhaust design, but haven't got enough info yet.

All interesting though.

nrick

1,866 posts

169 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
The other upside is they look like they are generic so a lot cheaper than that 1k carbon box.

K&N would be great, and I am sure if there is enough air getting to them should be very cost effective. To be fair it is worth it just for the noise!!