Looking at getting an Elise...

Looking at getting an Elise...

Author
Discussion

robmlufc

Original Poster:

5,229 posts

193 months

Friday 29th April 2011
quotequote all
Any thoughts from the experts on this one? Seems very good for the mileage!

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2762975.htm

Cheers

simpo555

560 posts

171 months

Friday 29th April 2011
quotequote all
Hi

For me far too expensive despite the mileage. Cant see it at more than £14750 and even at that price I think I'm being generous.

simpo555

560 posts

171 months

Friday 29th April 2011
quotequote all
Hi

In addition, no A-C. Much prefer the 2006 Club Racer at £19000 with 11K, A-C and H-Top, and thats negotiable. Anyway, thats my viewpoint

Edited by simpo555 on Friday 29th April 20:41

Bebee

4,697 posts

232 months

Saturday 30th April 2011
quotequote all
It looks clean but the drivers seat is telling me it's done 100k miles in the hands of a 20 stone bloke.
The price is about right for the mileage if genuine, try making an offer if it checks out ok.

kambites

68,419 posts

228 months

Saturday 30th April 2011
quotequote all
If the mileage is that low, I'd check very carefully that it's been serviced properly. Some people baulk at the idea of servicing their car every 600 miles.

Personally, I think I'd view such a low mileage car somewhat suspiciously - buy on condition not mileage or age.

mikeulster500

288 posts

288 months

Saturday 30th April 2011
quotequote all
If I was you, I'd buy the 135R that's listed for sale on here. Very rare and an awesome car!!

NJS25

446 posts

256 months

Saturday 30th April 2011
quotequote all
What others have said.

The seller states 'if you know your elises mileage is the killer", I know elises and I agree with Kambites "buy on condition".

The mileage concerns stem from HGFs, suspension wearing out and other consumables. Low milage cars can have issues with rubber bushes and gaiters which have had limited use and perished or hardened as a result. It's a tToyota engined car so HGF isn't an issue.

If I were buying second hand I'd be looking for a well cared for car with lots of bills and receipts showing what maintenance/ upgrades had been done.

Look, drive as many as you can then decide!

Regards, Neil

Chris49

1,121 posts

208 months

Saturday 30th April 2011
quotequote all
I have to agree. The number one rule with buying a loti is buy on condition and servicing.

A car with more miles, enthusiast owned with fist fulls or receipts is the way to go if to can.

Low mileage certainly does not make a good car.

Edited by Chris49 on Saturday 30th April 15:45

doggydave

329 posts

182 months

Saturday 30th April 2011
quotequote all
I think it is expensive for a 2004 even if it is low mileage. I agree with most of the comments above. Get a newer one with more miles on. There are lots at that sort of money. Just make sure its got a Toyota engine.

CardShark

4,206 posts

186 months

Saturday 30th April 2011
quotequote all
As above really. Yes the mileage is low but I wouldn't put *that* much of a price premium on it and to state that 'mileage is the killer' is crap, lack of servicing is the real killer.

It could well be an A1 car, but I'd be tempted to look elsewhere unless the servicing record was spot on and the price came down a chunk.

Edited by CardShark on Saturday 30th April 20:14

AverageMPH

493 posts

169 months

Sunday 1st May 2011
quotequote all
mikeulster500 said:
If I was you, I'd buy the 135R that's listed for sale on here. Very rare and an awesome car!!
I'm with you Mike on this one, I had a Lotus Elise 135R and traded it in against a 111R and regretted that move ever since.

The 135R is a great drivers car and a lot of fun, I put AO48 tyres on mine.

simpo555

560 posts

171 months

Sunday 1st May 2011
quotequote all
Its a 2004 car whatever the mileage. No AC. As soon as you start putting miles on it, because most people buy cars to drive them, the mileage goes up but remains a 2004 car. The value will drop like a brick. Look at dealers prices for 2004 cars and the take off £2000 for the real value of the car. As everyone has said, servicing and history more important. Interesting to know whether the car has been serviced every year as recomended despite the low miles. Only real argument for the seller is a 'slight premium' compared to another 2004 car with higher miles. However, to compare the car to a 2006-2007 model in terms of value because of the mileage is just plain nonsense. I'd even stretch to a 2008 car at that price without AC. Good luck to everyone, buyer and seller!

neilj37

79 posts

166 months

Sunday 1st May 2011
quotequote all
I would have expected it to be priced around 15k maybe 15.5k. Not sure what all the fuss is about A-C though, surely if you have an elise and it is sunny you have the top down. I can understand with an Exige as it gets hot in the cabin but not an elise. Never had any problems with mine and that doesn't have A-C.

simpo555

560 posts

171 months

Sunday 1st May 2011
quotequote all
Choice of AC not an issue. When comparing like with like, evidently a car without is less expensive than a car with. The issue for this posting is the price, mileage, specification and condition of the car in question. It can be considered as a lower spec car due to the fact it doesnt have AC. This is not a criticism of the choice, just plain fact. Lower spec cars should be less expensive. Simpels.
Here we have a lower spec car with very low mileage at a very high price. Higher spec cars, more recent, with only slightly higher mileages (+10000) at the same price. Take your choice, but for me, this car at the price advertised, is far from being the most reasoned choice of car. As it stands it would not figure in my top ten, according to cars advertised currently. Much rather a more recent car with up to 25K and FSH. for the same sort of money or even cheaper.

robmlufc

Original Poster:

5,229 posts

193 months

Sunday 1st May 2011
quotequote all
Thanks for the input folks, valuable stuff! Going to pop to the local Lotus garage this week for a proper look and drive hopefully.

crackthatoff

3,312 posts

220 months

Monday 2nd May 2011
quotequote all
AverageMPH said:
I'm with you Mike on this one, I had a Lotus Elise 135R and traded it in against a 111R and regretted that move ever since.

The 135R is a great drivers car and a lot of fun, I put AO48 tyres on mine.
na lotus decided to put a048s on before you did wink

piers1

831 posts

201 months

Saturday 7th May 2011
quotequote all
Chris49 said:
I have to agree. The number one rule with buying a loti is buy on condition and servicing.

A car with more miles, enthusiast owned with fist fulls or receipts is the way to go if to can.

Low mileage certainly does not make a good car.

Edited by Chris49 on Saturday 30th April 15:45
I totally agree too. If anything a car with 5k after 5 years is likely to be more trouble, once you start driving it. I would rather have an Elsie with miles on it, but a stack of receipts showing a caring owner, and a well looked after, want for nothing car.