GT Uprights

Author
Discussion

Herman Toothrot

Original Poster:

6,702 posts

205 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
I use my car daily and also about 8 time a year on track. I like how it behaves on the bumpy, undulating roads and from previous experience going for suspension upgrades have found they are usually a downgrade on all but the best condition / smooth roads and longevity.

I was wondering if a good way to lower but retain suspension travel and the original Bilsteins / Eibachs would be GT uprights such as the EP ones, the fronts for example the bearing is 16mm higher on the upright. So I get 16mm lower, retain original geomentry, loose a few grams, gain the ability to bolt on AP 4 pots should I want to upgrade, retain the Bilsteins / Eibach that are nice and comfortable on road. Only down side appears to be the cost? Which really isn't that huge (£700) considering how much people pay for upgraded dampers.

Is my logic sound or flawed?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

281 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
on the face of it, then no issues, however:

1) GT uprights are designed for 295+ disks
2) it's not recommended to run std (steel) steering arms with them
3) if you have ABS you need to check the are OK with speed sensor hub packs.

thegreenhell

17,215 posts

226 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
Only down side appears to be the cost? Which really isn't that huge (£700) considering how much people pay for upgraded dampers.

Is my logic sound or flawed?
Don't forget the other £1000+ you'd need for the rear pair. Also, I'm not sure if you can use the standard rear Brembo caliper with them.

Herman Toothrot

Original Poster:

6,702 posts

205 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
on the face of it, then no issues, however:

1) GT uprights are designed for 295+ disks
2) it's not recommended to run std (steel) steering arms with them
3) if you have ABS you need to check the are OK with speed sensor hub packs.
I already have a pair of Alcon 295's on Plans bells up front and a set of AP295s and Plans bells in the garage. So thats actually a benefit as I get to use my spare ones (should I do rears as well).

Ok so need to add the Aluminium front arms at £100 a pair.

It says they can be supplied with ABS hubs if required.

So really no downsides other than cost which for fronts would be £800 if I retained 2 pot AP's or £1600ish If i got 4 pots as well...

Herman Toothrot

Original Poster:

6,702 posts

205 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
Herman Toothrot said:
Only down side appears to be the cost? Which really isn't that huge (£700) considering how much people pay for upgraded dampers.

Is my logic sound or flawed?
Don't forget the other £1000+ you'd need for the rear pair. Also, I'm not sure if you can use the standard rear Brembo caliper with them.
Yes the rears are more pricy, happy to ditch the brembos with the EP 4 pot handbrake compatible calipers coming up. The brembos are real heavy weights so it'd be a significant saving at the rear (already has 295 discs & bells waiting for such a modification).

TIPPER

2,955 posts

226 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Have you tried the Elise on some good quality dampers (Nitron Ntr, Quantum.....).
I was surprised at the quality of the ride on Nitrons with (an admittedly not overstiff) 400/475 front to rear spring rate. The ride was firm but the quality of the damping is such that the car doesn't jiggle about so perceived ride quality is very good. I can't say I found the car skittish either. Most of my driving was on Devon 'B' roads. On Mways the ride was far better than many a saloon I can think of.

Herman Toothrot

Original Poster:

6,702 posts

205 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
TIPPER said:
Have you tried the Elise on some good quality dampers (Nitron Ntr, Quantum.....).
I was surprised at the quality of the ride on Nitrons with (an admittedly not overstiff) 400/475 front to rear spring rate. The ride was firm but the quality of the damping is such that the car doesn't jiggle about so perceived ride quality is very good. I can't say I found the car skittish either. Most of my driving was on Devon 'B' roads. On Mways the ride was far better than many a saloon I can think of.
I've been in an S1 and a VX220 on Nitrons. The S1 on the NTR single adjustables and the VX on Streets, but both on track only. I agree they did give a good ride and both owners praised them over standard and the one over GAZ that he had before and got ride of because of poor ride. Neither of the owners of these cars use them daily though, only weekend toys.

What are your opinions of the Nitrons (which Nitrons?) on the Devon B roads as this type of road would probably compare to what my car gets driven on the most to the tune of 10,000 miles a year.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

281 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
Also, I'm not sure if you can use the standard rear Brembo caliper with them.
there are brembo calliper mount versions (but once again, for 295 disks)

TIPPER

2,955 posts

226 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
TIPPER said:
Have you tried the Elise on some good quality dampers (Nitron Ntr, Quantum.....).
I was surprised at the quality of the ride on Nitrons with (an admittedly not overstiff) 400/475 front to rear spring rate. The ride was firm but the quality of the damping is such that the car doesn't jiggle about so perceived ride quality is very good. I can't say I found the car skittish either. Most of my driving was on Devon 'B' roads. On Mways the ride was far better than many a saloon I can think of.
I've been in an S1 and a VX220 on Nitrons. The S1 on the NTR single adjustables and the VX on Streets, but both on track only. I agree they did give a good ride and both owners praised them over standard and the one over GAZ that he had before and got ride of because of poor ride. Neither of the owners of these cars use them daily though, only weekend toys.

What are your opinions of the Nitrons (which Nitrons?) on the Devon B roads as this type of road would probably compare to what my car gets driven on the most to the tune of 10,000 miles a year.
Generally the car felt better 'planted'. You'll feel a big bump but the car generally follows the road in a beautifully damped manner. This was on Nitron NTR (single way adjustable) dampers with 400/475 lb/sq in springs. I never felt the car wanted to spit me into a ditch. The only thing to really watch for is bumpsteer - you can get that sorted (look it up on Seloc). With earplugs in and the stereo turned up the car really was a comfy ride on Mways.
I covered 40k miles in about 4 years, so similiar mileage to you.

Edited by TIPPER on Wednesday 26th January 21:05

Herman Toothrot

Original Poster:

6,702 posts

205 months

Wednesday 26th January 2011
quotequote all
TIPPER said:
Nitron NTR (single way adjustable) dampers with 400/475 lb/sq in springs.

I covered 40k miles in about 4 years, so similiar mileage to you.
Any rebuilds needed in that time or problems, I've read on seloc of people saying they've needed rebuilds in sub 10,000 miles which was off putting.

I do have the advantage with Nitrons of living not at all far away from them should any issues arise.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

281 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
if it helps, no set of Quantum's has needed a re-build yet...

randy

539 posts

283 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Both sets of Quantums of mine have been back for rebuild after loosing gas pressure... yet to find a race damper that is 100% in this respect.

randy

539 posts

283 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
I use my car daily and also about 8 time a year on track. I like how it behaves on the bumpy, undulating roads and from previous experience going for suspension upgrades have found they are usually a downgrade on all but the best condition / smooth roads and longevity.

I was wondering if a good way to lower but retain suspension travel and the original Bilsteins / Eibachs would be GT uprights such as the EP ones, the fronts for example the bearing is 16mm higher on the upright. So I get 16mm lower, retain original geomentry, loose a few grams, gain the ability to bolt on AP 4 pots should I want to upgrade, retain the Bilsteins / Eibach that are nice and comfortable on road. Only down side appears to be the cost? Which really isn't that huge (£700) considering how much people pay for upgraded dampers.

Is my logic sound or flawed?
Unless you have a specific need to lower the car significantly (like 65mm or something) then I would avoid. For sensible ride heights there will be no tangible benific and there is normally PITA fitment issues with these sorts of parts.

TIPPER

2,955 posts

226 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
I covered about 15k on my Nitrons (which I bought used with about 10k on them). My usage included 7 or 8 track days (which works them harder). If I'd kept the car I would probably have had them rebuilt for piece of mind.
Scuffers, how many miles/usage are we talking of with the Quantums.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

281 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
TIPPER said:
I covered about 15k on my Nitrons (which I bought used with about 10k on them). My usage included 7 or 8 track days (which works them harder). If I'd kept the car I would probably have had them rebuilt for piece of mind.
Scuffers, how many miles/usage are we talking of with the Quantums.
don't know is the honest answer, Quantum think that they should be OK for 4+ years without service.

TIPPER

2,955 posts

226 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
don't know is the honest answer, Quantum think that they should be OK for 4+ years without service.
Thanks, Academic at the mo thoughfrown