New 2Bular 4-1 Manifold for Toyota SC Engine

New 2Bular 4-1 Manifold for Toyota SC Engine

Author
Discussion

STEVEY_SC

Original Poster:

100 posts

194 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
Had Jim's new revised 4-1 manifold fitted today and decided to follow the de-facto standard protocol for fitting any modification (baseline dyno, fitting, mapping, post dyno) to keep everyone happy who is surely to dispute such information presented below. Bottom line is that its given a 25bhp & 12lb/ft gain which is pretty incredible.

Peak figures:

Before: 216whp, 145lb/ft (Katana+Induction+2Bular De-cat+8x24GT3GT3+custom map)
After: 241whp, 157lb/ft (Katana+Induction+2Bular 4-1+Flexi De-cat+8x24GT3+custom map)

Runs were same day, same operator.

so with a 12.5% correction that's 271bhp & 177lb/ft. I also had the K&N air filter cleaned prior to both dyno's just so there was no excuses on power output or any ponnies left sitting on the bench.

Total gains were 25whp gain and 12/ft for the 2Bular 4-1 and Flexi-decat which is fantastic.

Essex Autosport did the mapping and were also surprised at the gains.

Seems Jim's new 4-1 design is worth every penny![url]
|http://thumbsnap.com/e5wXAtel[/url]

Edited by STEVEY_SC on Wednesday 22 December 09:23

shangani

3,069 posts

244 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
Good result Steve. Jim does great work.

With those numbers all you now need is a supply of gearboxes.

STEVEY_SC

Original Poster:

100 posts

194 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
LOL

Yup the anticipation of my gearbox failing is itself rather quite exciting. smile

shangani

3,069 posts

244 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
At least you are driving your car. Mine has spent months not turning a wheel due to work and lack of time to bolt it back together.

Yours is going to be seriously quick. The increase in torque is much more than I would have thought, so Jim must have got the manifold spot on.

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

205 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
Is that any suprise? Its probably all down to the decat which unless you have a "friendly" MOT man will have to go back in once a year.

The Bandit

788 posts

202 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
Is that any suprise? Its probably all down to the decat which unless you have a "friendly" MOT man will have to go back in once a year.
Who cares,if correct, a genuine 25bhp gain with essentially just a manifold and cat is quite frankly outstanding.

/You're not helping my wallet frown

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

205 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
The Bandit said:
Herman Toothrot said:
Is that any suprise? Its probably all down to the decat which unless you have a "friendly" MOT man will have to go back in once a year.
Who cares,if correct, a genuine 25bhp gain with essentially just a manifold and cat is quite frankly outstanding.

/You're not helping my wallet frown
confused Outstanding how, in value for money terms? Cutting the cat out and just replacing with a straight secton on any forced induction car will allow great gains, the CAT's the most restrictive bit. You won't see many posts about it on new cars like toyota engined Elises because a CAT is compulsory for road use, it'll never pass a "by the book" MOT without one so most people can't be bothered with the hassle. I'd bet on 5bhp for the manifold 20bhp for the decat, this is old hat for anyone who's tuned a forced induction car surely?


STEVEY_SC

Original Poster:

100 posts

194 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
20bhp on a de-cat? if that was the case I think 90% of the tuned Yota Elise/Exiges would be running around with de-cats.

I remember the DC5 manifold on the Honda conversions gave similar gains...

I have a sports cat anyway which will probably be switched at some point.

Herman Toothrot said:
The Bandit said:
Herman Toothrot said:
Is that any suprise? Its probably all down to the decat which unless you have a "friendly" MOT man will have to go back in once a year.
Who cares,if correct, a genuine 25bhp gain with essentially just a manifold and cat is quite frankly outstanding.

/You're not helping my wallet frown
confused Outstanding how, in value for money terms? Cutting the cat out and just replacing with a straight secton on any forced induction car will allow great gains, the CAT's the most restrictive bit. You won't see many posts about it on new cars like toyota engined Elises because a CAT is compulsory for road use, it'll never pass a "by the book" MOT without one so most people can't be bothered with the hassle. I'd bet on 5bhp for the manifold 20bhp for the decat, this is old hat for anyone who's tuned a forced induction car surely?

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

205 months

Tuesday 21st December 2010
quotequote all
STEVEY_SC said:
20bhp on a de-cat? if that was the case I think 90% of the tuned Yota Elise/Exiges would be running around with de-cats.
I agree they would if it was road legal, which it isn't.. not a hope in hell of a decatted toyota engine elise passing an above board MOT.

I used to swap the cat out of my Eunos for MOT's as I had a bigger gain, about 40bhp as without the cat boost could go up and EGTs could be decrease without the resistance offered by the cat. It was a load of hassle as mapped correctly without the cat inserting the cat, restricted the flow messing up the map so I had to load up a with cat map as well at MOT time. Pain in the behind. I've reshelled the car into a 1989 shell so I don't have to mess about in the future.


Edited by Herman Toothrot on Tuesday 21st December 22:40

321freeflow

282 posts

228 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2010
quotequote all
Herman Toothrot said:
Is that any suprise? Its probably all down to the decat which unless you have a "friendly" MOT man will have to go back in once a year.
You need to read Steve's post again - this time engage what you call a brain and maybe you'll understand.
Steve had the de-cat and the GT3 system already fitted and MAPPED IN. I wanted this car on a dyno, on the same day, with the same operator for a base run THEN change out the std POS manifold for my 4-1. Any change (good or bad) would then be down to that 4-1. Wayne told me the change in AFR was dramatic, so we knew air flow was improved and once mapping/fuelling was dialled in, the gains were noted.

Herman Toothrot

6,702 posts

205 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2010
quotequote all
STEVEY_SC said:
Peak figures:

Before: 216whp, 145lb/ft (Katana+Induction+2Bular 8x24" GT3+custom map)
After: 241whp, 157lb/ft (Katana+Induction+2Bular 4-1+Flexi De-cat+8x24" GT3+custom map)

Runs were same day, same operator.
Before No Decat, After Decat.

He wrote it himself, clear as day it had a decat for the 2nd run, not for the 1st.

Edited by Herman Toothrot on Wednesday 22 December 09:20

STEVEY_SC

Original Poster:

100 posts

194 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2010
quotequote all
Sorry chaps a mistake on my behalf. It originally had a de-cat. Let me edit the original post.

GTRene

17,745 posts

231 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2010
quotequote all
wow, thats amazing...
so both without cat testing, thats a lot gain.

321freeflow

282 posts

228 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2010
quotequote all
Sorry, under stress today - boiler broken down, stuck in house till the heating engineer gets here!! Hurry up!

purpleperil

1,214 posts

291 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2010
quotequote all
321freeflow said:
Sorry, under stress today - boiler broken down, stuck in house till the heating engineer gets here!! Hurry up!
Not a frozen condensate pipe is it? - got me last week worth a look and save you a few quid if it is wink

321freeflow

282 posts

228 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2010
quotequote all
purpleperil said:
321freeflow said:
Sorry, under stress today - boiler broken down, stuck in house till the heating engineer gets here!! Hurry up!
Not a frozen condensate pipe is it? - got me last week worth a look and save you a few quid if it is wink
Fixed! Yes, you're right Carl - frozen bloody condensate pipe - backed right up to the boiler, soaked everything. Dried it all out, working again. BUT that pipe is on the outside, eng told me it'll happen again - need to insulate it better.

vetteheadracer

8,271 posts

260 months

Thursday 23rd December 2010
quotequote all
I'm thinking about adding one of Jim's 4-1 manifolds to my Scura, I already have an 8x22 2bular back box on the car.

321freeflow

282 posts

228 months

Thursday 23rd December 2010
quotequote all
vetteheadracer said:
I'm thinking about adding one of Jim's 4-1 manifolds to my Scura, I already have an 8x22 2bular back box on the car.
Nigel - where's me pics? I've done 5 Scuras, 3 with the zirco black tips and no pics!
Cheers! cool

GTRene

17,745 posts

231 months

Thursday 23rd December 2010
quotequote all
I like what you made of this Jim...looks good.



looks a bit complicated, each has his own mufler.



is that from 4-2-1-2? or 4-2-2

Edited by GTRene on Thursday 23 December 19:26

321freeflow

282 posts

228 months

Thursday 23rd December 2010
quotequote all
Ah, that was the old-design Euro Exit Rene - didn't really work; you see the pipe from the Cat to the T between the silencers? It's just a bit too close to the diffuser for my liking - given the engine movement on the 2zz-ge. That prototype is still on the car, still working but I took the Cat pipe up and behind the silencers on the Mk2 version.
Not a lot of room on these tbh. The whole exhaust bolted to the std manifold btw

Edited by 321freeflow on Thursday 23 December 19:33