Buying a used Exige S2, what to look out for?
Buying a used Exige S2, what to look out for?
Author
Discussion

trimbo

Original Poster:

1,099 posts

253 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
hello everyone, this is my first post on Piston Heads.

I'm looking to buy a used Exige S2, probably privately and quite possibly with higher than average miles (over 15k). Can anyone suggest anything to watch out for with the higher mileage cars?

Thanks
Steve

Davey S1

13,394 posts

284 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
Just check it has been serviced properly.

I would also check the details with Lotus and ask them to confirm that the warranty hasnt been invalidated for any reason.

Also try and get one with new(ish) tyres. They dont last particularly long and will be about £700 if you need to replace them all.

trimbo

Original Poster:

1,099 posts

253 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
thanks for that
does anyone know if the Exige S2 warranty can be extended? I think they lapse at 20k miles.

davejavue

141 posts

258 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
Air con a must- you will struggle to sell later if not.I have had my Exige for 2 months now was expecting the odd niggly problem but and have had no trouble at all ( touch wood ). Just do it - you won't regret it. PS get a yellow one and fit a stage 2 zorst!

twinpipe

1,396 posts

259 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
How much you looking to spend on s2 exige with 15k miles, ardent red, stage 2 zorst, ac, touring pack, new boots???

gooby

9,269 posts

264 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
twinpipe said:
How much you looking to spend on s2 exige with 15k miles, ardent red, stage 2 zorst, ac, touring pack, new boots???




Why are you selling it?

Please dont, there is no one as mad as us, Just1 is so boring he goes to the 'ring in a boggo civic. I need you :sob:

_topcat

1,938 posts

279 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
Just to help, mine haas done around 13k and i have had no problems whatsoever. Great little bomb proof car. Good luck with the search.

aelord

337 posts

255 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
If I were buying one all over again I'd ditch the utterly useless touring pack and get the eprformance pack plus air.

The TP gives nothing but nasty nylon carpet trim, vestigial sun visors that never need to be used, a 12 cm piece of netting and much crappier seats than the PP.The seats in the PP are fantastic looking things. You'll end up rertro fitting harnesses and bar to the TP at great expense if you get into track days, which is already on the PP cars.

Trouble is PP cars are rarer on the secondhand market, but can be found.

scotte

372 posts

264 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
aelord said:
If I were buying one all over again I'd ditch the utterly useless touring pack and get the eprformance pack plus air.

The TP gives nothing but nasty nylon carpet trim, vestigial sun visors that never need to be used, a 12 cm piece of netting and much crappier seats than the PP.The seats in the PP are fantastic looking things. You'll end up rertro fitting harnesses and bar to the TP at great expense if you get into track days, which is already on the PP cars.

Trouble is PP cars are rarer on the secondhand market, but can be found.


interesting ....

davejavue

141 posts

258 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
I was originally looking for a car with Touring pack but loved the seats + harnesses of the car I bought which had the Performance Pack.
I would say you should be able to pick up a car for around £25k privately - I paid £25750 for mine 2 months ago but it only had 3k miles on the clock.
Happy hunting!

chris_n

1,232 posts

288 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
aelord said:
If I were buying one all over again I'd ditch the utterly useless touring pack and get the eprformance pack plus air.

The TP gives nothing but nasty nylon carpet trim, vestigial sun visors that never need to be used, a 12 cm piece of netting and much crappier seats than the PP.


You forgot the stereo upgrade - to one that is a pig to use and doesn't work properly anyway!

Seriously though, I went for the touring pack, and would have to agree it was a complete waste of money. Aircon definitely a must though.

Chris

boggy

4,603 posts

265 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
Afternoon all,

Thanks guy's, I to was thinking of getting one with a touring pack, I'll go for the Performance pack with Air Cond instead

Just a thought what about Krypton Green ? that's my Colour

Boggy

beachbum

2,610 posts

261 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
Krypton Green !!!!!...... yes please. Looks amazing, all Exiges should be in that colour, but then it wouldnt be special, so maybe not

scotte

372 posts

264 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
i here the cam change over on the 240R is around 4000 (as opposed to 6200) making for a much smoother transition (i.e you wouldnt notice a lull) .... a mate got a shot of one at knockhill a couple of weekends back. When a new exige is released its going to be one hell of a beast.

scott

gooby

9,269 posts

264 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
I think the current versions will be the best. To get into the USA market, the next gen is going to need some very heavey additions like proper bumpers.

beachbum

2,610 posts

261 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
IIRC there was mention of a remap coming out for the Toyota lump, which caused the cutover to be come in lower, rumour was 4500 revs.

Anyone know if this is still on the cards. If it isnt would it be something that the OEM providers might distribute ??

chris_n

1,232 posts

288 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
beachbum said:
IIRC there was mention of a remap coming out for the Toyota lump, which caused the cutover to be come in lower, rumour was 4500 revs.

Anyone know if this is still on the cards. If it isnt would it be something that the OEM providers might distribute ??


I don't think it would make sense. A remap so the changeover occurred earlier on the normally aspirated engine would actually give worse performance as it would occur at too low revs for the more extreme second cam, when it would actually produce less power than the milder first cam.

The changeover point is (presumably) chosen to be the point at which the second cam produces more power than the first cam. The reason that crossover point is earlier on the 240R is because of the forced aspiration.

Davey S1

13,394 posts

284 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
chris_n said:

beachbum said:
IIRC there was mention of a remap coming out for the Toyota lump, which caused the cutover to be come in lower, rumour was 4500 revs.

Anyone know if this is still on the cards. If it isnt would it be something that the OEM providers might distribute ??



I don't think it would make sense. A remap so the changeover occurred earlier on the normally aspirated engine would actually give worse performance as it would occur at too low revs for the more extreme second cam, when it would actually produce less power than the milder first cam.

The changeover point is (presumably) chosen to be the point at which the second cam produces more power than the first cam. The reason that crossover point is earlier on the 240R is because of the forced aspiration.


Yes. The 240R can have a lower change point (4000 rpm) as it has more torque than the standard car.

scotte

372 posts

264 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
it was said that the 240r's lower change over lead to a straighter power curve i.e its a straight line (if that makse any sense) as opposed to the normal bump in the power curve with ExigeS2 at 6200. actually does that make any sense ?