Consider an early 9-3 convertible - Am I made??

Consider an early 9-3 convertible - Am I made??

Author
Discussion

deanogtv

Original Poster:

751 posts

227 months

Monday 13th May 2013
quotequote all
I have a grand for the budget and I see there are a few S & T reg example around for this money.
I'm guessing the standard things apply when checking a car over that going for a bag of sand.
Are the cracked bulk heads really that common. I'm hoping to pick a decent example up and undertake a little restro on it over the next few years here and there

Vince70

1,942 posts

201 months

Monday 13th May 2013
quotequote all
The 9-3 cabriolet does look like a lot of car for the money but beware of bulkhead cracks and remember its only a vectra cabriolet at the end of the day.

If it was my money I would go for a slightly older audi 80 cabriolet that way you will never have trouble with the rust bug.

But I've got to admit it looks a lot of car for the money.

swansea v6

1,281 posts

232 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
I've just picked up a 2000 model 9-3 turbo (185bhp) for £410! Everything works and it passed its mot without a single advisory. Clutch bearing is making a weird noise and the handling is erm soft, but the bulkhead crack was rectified two years ago so I am happy!

Definitely check out any sludge issues and make sure it has been run on synthetic oil with 5000 mile changes

griffin dai

3,215 posts

156 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
I sold mine last week frown


They get a lot of bad press as there's a lot of GM influence in them, but they're not a bad car at all! The handling's not that great so they really do need the following mods as a minimum to cut down on scuttle shake:

Steering rack clamp & brace
http://www.partsforsaabs.com/product_info.php?prod...

Subframe brace (2, 4 or 6 point) I had the ebay 6 point on mine but be aware the delivery times are long! Really long!!!
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SAAB-BRACE-9-3-900-6-Poi...

Another cheap mod is just piggy back the rear arb with another standard brace or buy a 22mm bar if you can find one.

The bulkhead split is common but not the end of the world, a Saab indi should be able to weld it for sub £400.

The sludging problem is for T7 engined cars (2000 onwards) although I had a late T5 engined car also 2000. Easiest way to check is open the bonnet and if the oil cap is dead center its T5, oil cap to the left and its T7.

ECU re-maps are dead cheap for these! If you get a lpt (no boost gauge in dash) then the jump in power goes from a very sluggish 154bhp to brisk 220ish.....well worth it, and also get the T7 mod done same time as the T5 valves tend to fail more than the t7 valves plus the t7 valves are cheaper. It also makes it nicer to drive with the boost coming in a lot smoother (who ever maps it should be able to do this for you as the ECU will need modifying)

Take a look on UKSaabs for remapping as a few of the guys can do it for not a lot of cash.


swansea v6

1,281 posts

232 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
I will definitely look into the chassis braces? I have a t7 model, how much can a remap take them up to?

griffin dai

3,215 posts

156 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
I think the general thoughts are 320bhp max on standard pistons, above that your looking at forged pistons or a b234 bottom end from a 9000.


swansea v6

1,281 posts

232 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
320bhp! Tough lump then!!

griffin dai

3,215 posts

156 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
T5 will give you 500 wink


swansea v6

1,281 posts

232 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
500!!!

griffin dai

3,215 posts

156 months

Tuesday 14th May 2013
quotequote all
swansea v6 said:
500!!!
...and a bit with lairy cams & tubular smile


rscott

15,250 posts

198 months

Wednesday 15th May 2013
quotequote all
griffin dai said:
swansea v6 said:
500!!!
...and a bit with lairy cams & tubular smile
Have you seen the 2.3 over on saabsunited running 1000bhp? Turbo is the size of a small planet

anonymous-user

61 months

Friday 17th May 2013
quotequote all
Vince70 said:
The 9-3 cabriolet does look like a lot of car for the money but beware of bulkhead cracks and remember its only a vectra cabriolet at the end of the day.
Quite a bit of duff information there...

Vince70

1,942 posts

201 months

Saturday 18th May 2013
quotequote all
Jimboka said:
Vince70 said:
The 9-3 cabriolet does look like a lot of car for the money but beware of bulkhead cracks and remember its only a vectra cabriolet at the end of the day.
Quite a bit of duff information there...
It might look just like the 900 model that preceded it, but beneath the familiar shape of the 9-3 Convertible lies a heavily revised design. In fact, it shares its underpinnings with the contemporary Vauxhall Vectra.

Many Saab drivers like the understated sophistication of these models, and most cars are usually well cared for, making them a potential good used buy.

But, there's more to its appeal than that. For a start, this is a convertible that can happily take four adults, provides a decent boot and protects its passengers from wind when the top is down.

However, the loss of the roof does nothing to help the handling. And, because the chassis flexes so much, the 9-3 doesn’t cope with poor quality road surfaces very well.

Saab has a proud history of turbocharged engines and the convertible is proof of that. However, the diesel engines available in the 9-3 hatchback didn’t make it into the soft-top.

Trade view


Still looks good in the right colour and holds value well. Aero and Viggen models sought after

Martin Keighley
Valuations expert,
What Car? Used Car Price Guide
Which one should I get?

Where's the misinformation and type Saab bulkhead crack in google and see what comes up, I'm not saying their bad for the money as you get one with a years ticket and tax now for around £700.
You can drive one for the summer and if anything major does go wrong at least you can weigh it in and you've not lost too much money.
Every car has its faults

Sparks

1,217 posts

286 months

Monday 20th May 2013
quotequote all
I had a 9-3 Convertible and loved it.

I also had a 9-3 5 door, that got a cracked bulkhead. The ex Saab mobile mechanic I use, had never seen one before, so while it is all over google, as a percentage, they are quite rare.

My 5 door was a diesel, and that adds about £300 to the bulkhead fix, due to removal & replacement of the soundproofing. This was caused by some diesel on the road, and the suspension getting a hell of a clout on a kerb.

I am currently thinking about getting another convertible, as they are so cheap.

Go for it, they make a great cruiser (as has been said, avoid rough roads, and chucking it about too much wink)

Sparks

Si_steve

1,121 posts

197 months

Monday 20th May 2013
quotequote all
Vince70 said:
It might look just like the 900 model that preceded it, but beneath the familiar shape of the 9-3 Convertible lies a heavily revised design. In fact, it shares its underpinnings with the contemporary Vauxhall Vectra.

Many Saab drivers like the understated sophistication of these models, and most cars are usually well cared for, making them a potential good used buy.

But, there's more to its appeal than that. For a start, this is a convertible that can happily take four adults, provides a decent boot and protects its passengers from wind when the top is down.

However, the loss of the roof does nothing to help the handling. And, because the chassis flexes so much, the 9-3 doesn’t cope with poor quality road surfaces very well.

Saab has a proud history of turbocharged engines and the convertible is proof of that. However, the diesel engines available in the 9-3 hatchback didn’t make it into the soft-top.

Trade view


Still looks good in the right colour and holds value well. Aero and Viggen models sought after

Martin Keighley
Valuations expert,
What Car? Used Car Price Guide
Which one should I get?

Where's the misinformation and type Saab bulkhead crack in google and see what comes up, I'm not saying their bad for the money as you get one with a years ticket and tax now for around £700.
You can drive one for the summer and if anything major does go wrong at least you can weigh it in and you've not lost too much money.
Every car has its faults
Cavalier actually...Still good cars

anonymous-user

61 months

Tuesday 21st May 2013
quotequote all
I thought the rare bulkhead crack issue may only affect pre-2003 'SAAB' SAABs
The GM 2003 onwards, which shares a tiny bit of Vectra (about as much a convertible Vectra as a Skoda is an Audi) did not suffer from this..

Vince70

1,942 posts

201 months

Tuesday 21st May 2013
quotequote all
The op is looking at buying a 1998-2000 car not a 2003

Si_steve

1,121 posts

197 months

Tuesday 21st May 2013
quotequote all
1998-2002 models suffered the bulkhead cracking issue, later ones were based a little on the vectras along with the 9-5....the earlier 1998-2002 models are still GM but Cavalier based instead.

mecliveharris

6 posts

137 months

Thursday 11th July 2013
quotequote all
You are not mad. I have one. It shakes like jelly, even though I have the brace from Abbott. jelly....mmmmmm

BobTurner

398 posts

217 months

Wednesday 17th July 2013
quotequote all
We ran a '98 9-3 cab. for 60k miles. It was flawed, but did so many things well we forgave it.

I had understood that the various bracing measures you can undertake just transfer the load so that you get a failure somewhere else in the bulkhead.

Ours had nearly 100k on it by the time we parted, some of them quite hard cross country miles and there were no bulkhead cracks. An oil leak requiring the engine to come out, its low value and imminent arrival of small child meant we parted ways frown

It also did a GPS verified 129mph (2.3 automatic, no turbo) 2 up with fuel and luggage, the speedo was wound off the clock past 150mph, a slight slope may have afflicted that stretch of autobahn hehe

edit to add, I am sure the fact that it only had 16" rims helped the ride, the flexibility and longevity of the bulkhead

Edited by BobTurner on Wednesday 17th July 12:58