Thinking about a Saab - Advice wanted

Thinking about a Saab - Advice wanted

Author
Discussion

alisdairm

Original Poster:

264 posts

168 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Hi, I am upsizing my familty and need to upsize my car, I currently have a 2002 Mazda 323 2.0 Sport, but don't think it'll hold my wife, 2 kids, baby gear, pram, and a weeks worth of shopping.

I love the Jap reliabillity and was hoping to find it in a Saab, as neither Honda, Mazda, or Toyota large family cars float my boat (Accord, 6, Avensis).

I do about 22k a year, want a fast petrol salloon, would prefer Auto, and I have about £5000/6000k to spend.

Any advice on models (9-3 or 9-5), and what to avoid/look out for.

Thanks

Ali

Prof Beard

6,669 posts

234 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
9-5 Saabs are good value at the moment. The estates are particularly good - get an Aero for real wumph...

jay140285

626 posts

191 months

Wednesday 18th April 2012
quotequote all
Dont be put off by a diesel

Get it re mapped and they can be very quick.

I have very good performance out of my 2005 93 yet if I sit at a steady 70 on the motorway can see mpg in the low 70's

With the miles your looking to do its got to be worth a thought.

otolith

58,917 posts

211 months

Wednesday 18th April 2012
quotequote all
We have a 9-5 Aero estate - it's big, quiet, rides well, has superbly comfortable seats, sensible ergonomics, overtakes well, is relaxing to drive, all the toys work, would probably protect us well in a crash, gets low to mid thirties on a run and does about 26-27mpg day to day. I like it. It isn't really a driver's car for me, too heavy, front wheel drive, turbocharged, but for what we use it for it is superb.

There were oil sludging issues with some of the petrol engines - the Aero models should have been run on fully synthetic oil from new and as a result should not suffer from them. We had the sump dropped and cleaned out anyway as a precaution.

I was quite interested in the V6 diesel option, until I researched it, and decided that it was too much of a liability.

Seeker UK

1,443 posts

165 months

Monday 23rd April 2012
quotequote all
jay140285 said:
Dont be put off by a diesel

Get it re mapped and they can be very quick.
^This

The 150bhp TiD is pretty rapid from 30-70 w/out a remap.

I've never, ever seen 70mpg in mine though :-)

bakerstreet

4,822 posts

172 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
jay140285 said:
Dont be put off by a diesel

Get it re mapped and they can be very quick.

I have very good performance out of my 2005 93 yet if I sit at a steady 70 on the motorway can see mpg in the low 70's

With the miles your looking to do its got to be worth a thought.
I have a 2005 93 TID 150 and I'm sorry, but I don't believe your car is doing 70mpg.

I am down to 65mph on the duals and 70/75 on the motorway and I'm up to 46mpg and thats a pump to pump figure, not what the OBC says.

Seeker UK

1,443 posts

165 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
I average 38 in mine and on a recent 500 mile run (mostly motorway and A roads 60-70 mph) and doing a "brim to brim" I got 48. A far cry from the 60 Saab reckon - IME experience most cars get 90% of the MPG that the manufacturer's claim but the Saab seems worse. 48mpg isn't bad though.

otolith

58,917 posts

211 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
For petrol comparison to that, we recently did a couple of hundred miles of mostly motorway and averaged a tenth or two under 35mpg against an official extra-urban figure of 42.2mpg.

Seeker UK

1,443 posts

165 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
otolith said:
For petrol comparison to that, we recently did a couple of hundred miles of mostly motorway and averaged a tenth or two under 35mpg against an official extra-urban figure of 42.2mpg.
Even for 35 mpg, you won't find another estate with that sort of performance for that sort of price for that sort of fuel consumption. 8-)