Mechanics AS question

Author
Discussion

motordave

Original Poster:

208 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Ok so i've got a bit of a tricky question to do i'd be greatful for any solutions:

A particle rests in limiting equilibrium on a plan inclined at 30' to the horizontal. Determine the acceleration with which the particle will slide down the plane when the angle is changed to 40'.

Thanks nerd

Soft Top

1,468 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Don't know butas no-one has answered so far I'll take a guess, (and it really is a guess).

At 30 degrees it is at rest and gravity is 9.6 m/s2
The remaining angle to 90 degrees are 60
60/90 is 66.66%
Thus 66.66% of 9.6 m/s2 is 6.4 m/s2

Very simplistic and I think entirely wrong but at least I had what I believe is a semi-intelligent stab at it!

motordave

Original Poster:

208 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
you never didi do mechanics did you?

johnnywgk

2,579 posts

189 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
yeah, me too,

i'm just trying to sound smart,

dont blame me etc.

ShadownINja

77,492 posts

289 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
How does a particle rest in limiting equilibrium... unless there's friction. So you need to work out the coefficient of friction then apply that for the change in angle to gravity acting in the direction of the plane.




























But it's been about 20 years since I did applied mathematics so I may be talking st.

Soft Top

1,468 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
motordave said:
you never didi do mechanics did you?
I did but 14 years ago and I skipped a lot of classes! Can't remember a thing now.

Incorrigible

13,668 posts

268 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
I think (bearing in mind my A levels were 20 years ago) that the friction force on the point of slipping or slipping is the same (which is complete bks but that's not the point here)

So at 30 degree friction is equal and opposite to the mass * sin30

The difference in force will be mass*(sin40 - sin30)

So the acceleration will be

mass*(sin40 - sin30)/mass = sin40 - sin30

Although a more complete answer would be to calculate the coeficient of friction as the resistive force of the friction will be less at the higher angle.


>> AS has now been mentioned rolleyes


Edited by Incorrigible on Wednesday 25th March 21:34

ShadownINja

77,492 posts

289 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Soft Top said:
motordave said:
you never didi do mechanics did you?
I did but 14 years ago and I skipped a lot of classes! Can't remember a thing now.
Ditto but 20 years ago... got an A for my (proper tongue out) A-levels, too.

Nobody You Know

8,422 posts

200 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
I have my old AS mechanics book on my desk, if know one answered later I'll crack it open and report back.

motordave

Original Poster:

208 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
ShadownINja said:
How does a particle rest in limiting equilibrium... unless there's friction. So you need to work out the coefficient of friction then apply that for the change in angle to gravity acting in the direction of the plane.
But there are not any values for any forces / coefficient of friction. If F=ma and F= m g sin 30 than maybe i can cancel out mass or something???

Edited by motordave on Wednesday 25th March 21:38

nelly1

5,637 posts

238 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all

Soft Top

1,468 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Incorrigible said:
Stuff
That sounds familiar. It's all flooding back now!

OK so not really but it does sound familiar. A bit like slowly remembering that big night out whilst recovering from the hangover the next day.

filski666

3,847 posts

199 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
since when did accel due to gravity reduce to 9.6m/s^2? - When I was at school it was 9.81 - has something happened to the planet I missed?

bitwrx

1,352 posts

211 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
No coeff of F required, no mass of particle required.

Particle at rest therefore F due to friction up the slope is equal to F due to gravity down the slope.

Accel due to gravity down slope = 9.81 * sin30 = 4.9

Now tip slope up to 40 deg.

Accel due to gravity down slope = 9.81 * sin40 = 6.3

Therefore

The particle will accelerate down the 40 deg slope at 1.4ms^-2.

(i.e. what incorrigible said)

If you write out F=ma for the forces along the slope, you'll see that F and m cancel out, leaving you just working with a (which is what I expect the question wants).

HTH

motordave

Original Poster:

208 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Thanks Incorrigble but 2 things. a) i assume when you say sin40-sin30 you mean 9.8sin40-9.8sin30 and b)my text book says the answer is 1.97 but that gives 1.39ms^-2

bitwrx

1,352 posts

211 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
filski666 said:
since when did accel due to gravity reduce to 9.6m/s^2? - When I was at school it was 9.81 - has something happened to the planet I missed?
If you go to the equator it's only 9.79ms^-2 (I think). That's why the French send their satellites to French Guiana - saves on fuel.

motordave

Original Poster:

208 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Can i assume the text book to be wrong giving an answer of 1.97?

Mark-C

5,817 posts

212 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
a=1.965











or at least that's what Google revealed to me

motordave

Original Poster:

208 posts

194 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
Mark-C said:
a=1.965











or at least that's what Google revealed to me
HELP

Incorrigible

13,668 posts

268 months

Wednesday 25th March 2009
quotequote all
motordave said:
Thanks Incorrigble but 2 things. a) i assume when you say sin40-sin30 you mean 9.8sin40-9.8sin30 and b)my text book says the answer is 1.97 but that gives 1.39ms^-2
If you already know the answer, why the fcensoredk are you asking us smile

Anyway I think you need to take into account the difference in friction in the 2 angles

Is that enough of a hint.....

Sorry we had to work it out ourselves when I were a lad blah blah all fields etc