High-Def SDHC card camcorders
High-Def SDHC card camcorders
Author
Discussion

Landlord

Original Poster:

12,689 posts

286 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
Hello gang,

I'm after one of these camcorders that do true HD and record to SDHC cards - but I've not the foggiest about the current technology.

Is the Panasonic any good? I've got a panasonic tape camcorder that I bought about 10 years ago (though it was leading edge at the time) and it still works brilliantly (but I can't be arsed with downloading tapes, making sure I'm not overwriting etc. plus it's SD).

So - does anyone have any advice?

Cheers,
Phil.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
By TrueHD one assumes you mean 1080p?

If so, mumble, mutter, grumble, banghead, kickdog, swear, tut, rolleyes, goforfag

tburfield

64 posts

234 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
The Panasonic got poor reviews in low light, so I opted for the Canon HF100 (HF10 also available).

Have been really happy with image quality so far, although I've not had the camcorder too long.

Tony

oobster

7,683 posts

240 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
I've heard the Canon HF100 is quite good.

http://fwd.five.tv/gadgets/audio-video/cameras/cam...

Just under £500 i think.

Mattt

16,664 posts

247 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
Going for the HD 'Amateur' market then?

Landlord

Original Poster:

12,689 posts

286 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
If so, mumble, mutter, grumble, banghead, kickdog, swear, tut, rolleyes, goforfag
That's lost on me Matt? Am I being a techno-idiot by saying TrueHD? What I mean is I want great quality, wide-screen video of my boys doing funny things that will still look great in years to come!

Mattt said:
Going for the HD 'Amateur' market then?
See above... NO! wink

Cheers gents. The Canon looks interesting. I think I may go for that.

Neil_H

15,418 posts

280 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
tburfield said:
The Panasonic got poor reviews in low light
Bit harsh, maybe they couldn't see it probably.

h0b0

9,067 posts

225 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
I have the HF100 as well and the quality is good. When I was looking for a camera the Panasonic did not really get mentioned but the Sony came high. The down sides of the Canon are the low light level picture and lack of veiw finder. I would not buy the HF10 as it just has a built in memory card that can be bought at less than the difference in price.

Here is where I got mine from

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-HF100-Definition-Camco...

This was at a time when the pound was $2

h0b0

Landlord

Original Poster:

12,689 posts

286 months

Wednesday 17th December 2008
quotequote all
h0b0 said:
I would not buy the HF10 as it just has a built in memory card that can be bought at less than the difference in price.
I went for the HF10 (actually I bought both with a view to sending one back) because it's down to 499 now. That's only a tenner more than the HF100 with 8Gb card on Amazon. So 16Gb of internal for a bit more than an 8Gb card. Plus, it means I can bung a 16Gb card and take hours and hours of footage (hooray!) wink

sevros1981

718 posts

236 months

Wednesday 17th December 2008
quotequote all
Landlord said:
Plotloss said:
If so, mumble, mutter, grumble, banghead, kickdog, swear, tut, rolleyes, goforfag
That's lost on me Matt? Am I being a techno-idiot by saying TrueHD? What I mean is I want great quality, wide-screen video of my boys doing funny things that will still look great in years to come!
I think what he was getting at was that these HD camcorders that claim true HD 1080p are tosh. It can record 1440 x 1080 interlaced but at a heavily compressed ratio, so don't expect it to look like a Blu-Ray on a HD telly.

oobster

7,683 posts

240 months

Wednesday 17th December 2008
quotequote all
Landlord said:
h0b0 said:
I would not buy the HF10 as it just has a built in memory card that can be bought at less than the difference in price.
I went for the HF10 (actually I bought both with a view to sending one back) because it's down to 499 now. That's only a tenner more than the HF100 with 8Gb card on Amazon. So 16Gb of internal for a bit more than an 8Gb card. Plus, it means I can bung a 16Gb card and take hours and hours of footage (hooray!) wink
Let us know your opinions on it when you've used it a few times please!

Landlord

Original Poster:

12,689 posts

286 months

Wednesday 17th December 2008
quotequote all
oobster said:
Landlord said:
h0b0 said:
I would not buy the HF10 as it just has a built in memory card that can be bought at less than the difference in price.
I went for the HF10 (actually I bought both with a view to sending one back) because it's down to 499 now. That's only a tenner more than the HF100 with 8Gb card on Amazon. So 16Gb of internal for a bit more than an 8Gb card. Plus, it means I can bung a 16Gb card and take hours and hours of footage (hooray!) wink
Let us know your opinions on it when you've used it a few times please!
Will do!

bobthemonkey

4,206 posts

245 months

Wednesday 17th December 2008
quotequote all
I will await the "how the hell do I edit AVCHD" post.

Landlord

Original Poster:

12,689 posts

286 months

Wednesday 17th December 2008
quotequote all
bobthemonkey said:
I will await the "how the hell do I edit AVCHD" post.
hehe I read that. Mneh. I'll just archive it till it's simple. wink

bobthemonkey

4,206 posts

245 months

Wednesday 17th December 2008
quotequote all
Its not all that difficult in all honesty. There was some crap being thrown around in the early days, but is mostly sorted, providing you use up to date software.

Edited by bobthemonkey on Wednesday 17th December 15:09