Cloverfields - Biggest bag of crap film
Cloverfields - Biggest bag of crap film
Author
Discussion

cat@10

Original Poster:

141 posts

238 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
Watched Cloverfields last night on DVD, and it was crap. Gave me a headache watching a shaking camera for over an hour and it ended with no conclusion. I feel bad for anyone who went to the cinema to watch it, must have given people motion sickness. Too anyone who hasn't seen it - DON'T , it's just time lost in your life.

Orb the Impaler

1,881 posts

220 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I was a bit disappointed too; it could have been excellent, but the stupid teenager angle and, as you say, the in-your-face shaky camcorder thing really pissed me off.

pbirkett

20,573 posts

302 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I liked it getmecoat

Raffles

1,931 posts

260 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
pbirkett said:
I liked it getmecoat
Me too. Something a bit different...

Alex106

1,007 posts

226 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I saw it at the cinema, and after a giant bag of peanut m&ms, and the shaking camera, i felt sick

Fiddlemesticks

14,470 posts

246 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I thought it wasnt too bad. Took a while to get going but seriously, wasnt that bad.

Maybe the hype meant some would expect more, but on the film along, maybe a 6 or 7 out of 10.

Now Blair Witch 2 - thats bad. Please watch and compare.

Brown and Boris

11,838 posts

265 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
Up there with the Blair Witch Project as the least scary scary film. My OH had to leave the rom as the hand held camera made her ill.

thebluebus

3,558 posts

247 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
It's not supposed to be a work of genius.

It's just another giant monster film - only it's really well done, with the clever first-person twist.

Remember to compare it to Godzilla, not Schindler's List.

I liked it too.

V8mate

45,899 posts

219 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I felt that the ending was just the beginning of the story; it was like they made a movie intro into a whole film.

Clearly, ready for II, III, IV, V etc.

Bill Carr

2,234 posts

264 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I liked it.

okgo

42,158 posts

228 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
Thought it was OK, nothing amazing, and certainly not as well done as BWP.

And its Cloverfield without the s.

Edited by okgo on Thursday 13th November 08:51

slow_poke

1,855 posts

264 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I liked it enough to go see the sequel, if they make one.

fathomfive

11,224 posts

220 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I went to the cinema to watch it and came away thinking it could just have been so much better. A nice idea which is very difficult to carry off.

My biggest gripe with it is the scene where the group are on opposite sides of the road, there is stuff being thrown down the road and very obviously a big scary thing is at the end of said road. Now my question was why on earth, in those circumstances, would you be filming your frigging friends?

gbbird

5,197 posts

274 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I thought it was very good. A bit different from your usual box office effort.

g

paulshears

804 posts

227 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
i liked Cloverfield

thought Blair Witch was rubbish

Xaero

4,063 posts

245 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I thought when it came out it did make people in the cinema sick.
When I first heard that, I thought it must have had some pretty gory scenes, was disapointed to learn it was motion sickness and the only horrific thing was the camera control frown

I thought it was naff too, even if the camera issue was corrected, it was average considering the hype and budget involved.

db08

330 posts

236 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
fathomfive said:
My biggest gripe with it is the scene where the group are on opposite sides of the road, there is stuff being thrown down the road and very obviously a big scary thing is at the end of said road. Now my question was why on earth, in those circumstances, would you be filming your frigging friends?
My thoughts exactly. I was screaming "turn the camera to the left you tt!"

B.J.W

5,875 posts

245 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
Really enjoyed Cloverfield.

Ignoring the semi-cardboard cut out characters and one or two plot holes, I thought it was an original take on a well worn genre, bearing in mind that it is difficult to make an original 'monster flick' without indirectly (or directly) referring to the bench marks set by (the original) King Kong, The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms and (more latterly), Alien.

Cloverfield stands up well to a second viewing, particularly as the viewer will by now be used to the camera movement and the fact that it is not that long in duration.

People who have watched Cloverfield tend to fall into two camps. For those that enjoyed it I would also recommend watching The Mist. As mentioned in a previous post, The Mist postively celebrates the B-Movie SF genre of the 1950's. Better characterisation, more of a plot and although the basic premise is the same, The Mist is the better film.

merc_man

1,926 posts

232 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
I quite liked it in a harmless way to switch off brain for a couple hours sort of way.

Now 28 weeks later, which I watched for the first time last night was, whilst reasonably atmospheric, a god awful mess of a storyline with the most predictable ending since little red riding hood was caught suffering from severe lupine myopia.

Elskeggso

3,100 posts

217 months

Thursday 13th November 2008
quotequote all
merc_man said:
I quite liked it in a harmless way to switch off brain for a couple hours sort of way.
Me too, I got pretty into it when I watched it. Also, the ending makes more sense if you watch all the way through the credits apparently.