David Icke a Nutter or Genius?

[Richie200]

I am pretty much aware of the majority of the subjects he has researched over the years including all the royal family lizard child abusing nonsense. It is also very much apparent that whenever his name is mentioned there are always the 'he is a fecking fruit loop brigade', discrediting any idea he has. I am not asking what persuation you are on this subject but if you have a watch the video in the link from this year, it is hard to find any reasonable doubt to what he is saying.

Please do not respond to this thread to call him or his work a load of old bks without watching this. I am well aware of his reputation. I would just like someone to point out where he is wrong from the following material if you honestly think that to be the case. Good old fashioned debate relative to the material, not opinion from previous exposure to his work!

http://www.edgemediatv.com/article001_icke.html

[G'kar]

Nearly 3 hours?

Are you raving?

[anonymous-user]

David icke......isnt he the son of god???

[MrV]

I have just done my daily trawl thought his forums ,well I need something to make me laugh at the end of a hard day

[Waynester]

I have no axe to grind here with Mr Icke, each to their own an all. I am fairly intrigued in what he has to say. Problem is that vid is nearly 3 hours long!!

[Muntu]

He was a better at goalkeeping

[Richie200]

Predictable response thus far! I don't expect a reasonable analysis for at least 3 hours. The actual question, if you chose to read the accompanying text I wrote asks for debate 'based on the material....'

[Muntu]

Richie200 said:

Predictable response thus far! I don't expect a reasonable analysis for at least 3 hours. The actual question, if you chose to read the accompanying text I wrote asks for debate 'based on the material....'

Try looking up one of the previous threads on this subject then.

[Richie200]

Waynester said:

I have no axe to grind here with Mr Icke, each to their own an all. I am fairly intrigued in what he has to say. Problem is that vid is nearly 3 hours long!!

I appreciate that Wayne. I am very sceptical of much of what he has said in the past but this really is quite a polished interesting lecture and certainly worth a watch

[G'kar]

Richie200 said:

Predictable response thus far! I don't expect a reasonable analysis for at least 3 hours. The actual question, if you chose to read the accompanying text I wrote asks for debate 'based on the material....'

Hence my response.

No comment on the content, just that you are probably going to get an interesting level of debate from a request for people to watch a 3 hour internet video before commenting.

Primarily because anyone who gives up three hours of their time on that is going to be a deeply questionable individual.

Glad you enjoyed it though.

[scotal]

Richie200 said:

Predictable response thus far! I don't expect a reasonable analysis for at least 3 hours. The actual question, if you chose to read the accompanying text I wrote asks for debate 'based on the material....'

Which you exepct us to watch for 3 hours...... you're as mental as he is.

Lets be fair, he may or may not have a point, but everything about David Icke is going to be coloured by his some of the drivel he has spouted in the past.

Saying that that old stuff was mad, but his new stuff is ok and therefore he should be listened to is like saying that Hitler was great for building all those autobahns whilst conveniently ignoring the Holocaust.

That you thought to post it on a forum like PH and expect a reasoned response marks you out as nearly as barmy as him.

[sleep envy]

[scotal]

sleep envy said:

MMMMM Delicious Cake...

[Maxf]

[s2art]

Nutter? As nutty as a bunch of hazelnuts that are professors of Nuttyness at nuthouse college.

[Pesty]

"The parahuman Serpent People of the past are still among us. They were probably worshipped by the builders of Stonehenge and the forgotten ridge-making cultures of South America. "...In some parts of the world the Serpent People successfully posed as gods and imitated the techniques of the super intelligence"

I'm voting nutter and I am not going to watch the 3 hour clip. If that bothers you tuff tities .

[Muntu]

[tinman0]

Richie200 said:

I am pretty much aware of the majority of the subjects he has researched over the years including all the royal family lizard child abusing nonsense. It is also very much apparent that whenever his name is mentioned there are always the 'he is a fecking fruit loop brigade', discrediting any idea he has. I am not asking what persuation you are on this subject but if you have a watch the video in the link from this year, it is hard to find any reasonable doubt to what he is saying.

Please do not respond to this thread to call him or his work a load of old bks without watching this. I am well aware of his reputation. I would just like someone to point out where he is wrong from the following material if you honestly think that to be the case. Good old fashioned debate relative to the material, not opinion from previous exposure to his work!

http://www.edgemediatv.com/article001_icke.html

3 hours of brain washing? Surely you can do better than that.

Watched his documentary on tv, and the guy is absolutely raving bonkers. He uses narrow visions of the world around him to explain the wider picture and fails miserably to be convincing let alone coherent.

Get a life mate and move on ffs.

[Richie200]

tinman0 said:

Richie200 said:

I am pretty much aware of the majority of the subjects he has researched over the years including all the royal family lizard child abusing nonsense. It is also very much apparent that whenever his name is mentioned there are always the 'he is a fecking fruit loop brigade', discrediting any idea he has. I am not asking what persuation you are on this subject but if you have a watch the video in the link from this year, it is hard to find any reasonable doubt to what he is saying.

Please do not respond to this thread to call him or his work a load of old bks without watching this. I am well aware of his reputation. I would just like someone to point out where he is wrong from the following material if you honestly think that to be the case. Good old fashioned debate relative to the material, not opinion from previous exposure to his work!

http://www.edgemediatv.com/article001_icke.html

3 hours of brain washing? Surely you can do better than that.

Watched his documentary on tv, and the guy is absolutely raving bonkers. He uses narrow visions of the world around him to explain the wider picture and fails miserably to be convincing let alone coherent.

Get a life mate and move on ffs.

Tinman, I am not fecking interested on what other things you chose to watch nor anything you do in your spare time (hence that not being the question asked). Nobody asked for your random thoughts. The question once again for yourself and others inept at reading was based on the video attached. I am fully aware of the other rather insane ideas Mr Icke has presented in the past. I thought I made it perfectly clear that I do not have any intention of debating anything other than the original video.

[jmorgan]

Aye carumba someone swallowed the spiel...... gulp