US Election, a question.
US Election, a question.
Author
Discussion

raf_gti

Original Poster:

4,254 posts

236 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
With the US Election almost upon us I've been reading a lot of the Electoral College. I'm I correct in thinking that an individual doesn't vote directly for a candidate but for an 'Elector' who will then make the official vote? For the most democratic country in the world it seems a bit of a strange way of doing it don't you think? In the fact the whole electrion seems rather strange but that is a whole different thread!

kambites

71,511 posts

251 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
It's not utterly dissimilar to the way we elect our prime minister. Everyone votes for an MP, the MPs effectively vote for a PM. The difference in the US is that different states have different number of votes whereas here, each constituency elects a single MP with a single vote.

Both systems are pretty ste really.

In neither system do you need to get the largest share of the popular vote in order to win.


ETA: US states vary in how they actually vote in the electoral college. Some states will give all their allocated votes to whoever wins the popular vote in that state, others will split their electoral college votes to reflect the balance of the popular vote.

Edited by kambites on Monday 3rd November 12:20

SkinnyBoy

4,635 posts

288 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
It works out something like this:


Marf

22,907 posts

271 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
SkinnyBoy said:
It works out something like this:

hehe

Morpeth

666 posts

225 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
Marf said:
SkinnyBoy said:
It works out something like this:

hehe
hehehehehehe

130R

7,103 posts

236 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
Interesting map. One day I hope to visit all 57 States like Barack Obama.

skeggysteve

5,724 posts

247 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
I understand the electoral college thing, but what I don't know is which side is labour.

It's not really important because I've been wondering for years biggrin Just thought I ask.

Not that it matters because we are ruled by the EU now not the USA wink

RDE

5,037 posts

244 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
Four more years for Bartlett I say.

G'kar

3,728 posts

216 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
RDE said:
Four more years for Bartlett I say.
You feckless thug....You get Hoynes.

trooperiziz

9,457 posts

282 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
skeggysteve said:
I understand the electoral college thing, but what I don't know is which side is labour.
There is no "Labour", just "Conservative" and "More Conservative"

Mannginger

10,274 posts

287 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
When does the candidate elected become the president or is it as soon as the result is declared?

At what point does the incumbent president have to retire?

jazzybee

3,056 posts

279 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
Mannginger said:
When does the candidate elected become the president or is it as soon as the result is declared?

At what point does the incumbent president have to retire?
IIRC they become President Elect immediately as the other candidate concedes. They become President at the inauguration ceremony on 20th January 2009.

Mannginger

10,274 posts

287 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
thumbup

Cheers. (I thought January came into it somewhere!)

just me

5,964 posts

250 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
It does. Right after December. Happens every year!

skeggysteve

5,724 posts

247 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
trooperiziz said:
skeggysteve said:
I understand the electoral college thing, but what I don't know is which side is labour.
There is no "Labour", just "Conservative" and "More Conservative"
Good point smile

So who is the cons and who is the more cons?

Simpo Two

92,838 posts

295 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
skeggysteve said:
trooperiziz said:
skeggysteve said:
I understand the electoral college thing, but what I don't know is which side is labour.
There is no "Labour", just "Conservative" and "More Conservative"
Good point smile

So who is the cons and who is the more cons?
Once I'd have agreed with you, but now I'd say the Democrats (Obama) are like New Labour (great oratory so they get voted in, then crank up taxes and piss them up the wall) and the Republicans are right of our Conservative party (which isn't saying much) - ie traditional American.

'Hey, that Obama guy says he's going to Change things.'

'Great, I don't think much of what we've got. What's he going to change?'

'Dunno.'

'What's he going to replace it with?'

'He didn't say, he just said he was going to Change stuff.'

'OK, I'll vote for him then...'



I hope everyone here who hates Bush and therefore thinks Americans are 'stupid' will re-categorise them as 'intelligent' when they vote in the media darling.

Maxwedge

361 posts

237 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
The Electoral College was developed because in the late 1700's a show of hands was pretty hard to do...SOOOOOOOOO what they do is each state's votes are counted and the college representative votes in accord to what the popular vote for his/her state...example say Obama wins Indiana, that is 7 electoral votes, Indiana is an all or nothing state so the college places ALL its votes from Indiana for Obama even if Obama only gets 49% of the popular vote, he gets all the votes as far as Americans/Conservatives being Part of "Dumbfkistan"...things to consider outside Iraq, that make people vote for the conservatives...Illegal Immigration, Abortion, Gun control, Crazy government spending and growth, Taxes....
as far as Pres Bush, well lets just say he did not do anything significant with regards to those issues. Not much of a conservative.

Muntu

7,684 posts

229 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
130R said:
Interesting map. One day I hope to visit all 57 States like Barack Obama.
I would like to too, but I think it might be above my pay grade.

Simpo Two

92,838 posts

295 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
Muntu said:
I would like to too, but I think it might be above my pay grade.
I'm terribly sorry, I read that as 'gay pride'!!!

Muntu

7,684 posts

229 months

Monday 3rd November 2008
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Muntu said:
I would like to too, but I think it might be above my pay grade.
I'm terribly sorry, I read that as 'gay pride'!!!
Yes, I just had a bit of momentary dyslexia and read it that way too smile

No, I'm not a poofter