Keynesian Meddling.
Author
Discussion

Fittster

Original Poster:

20,120 posts

243 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
What a surprise are blessed political classes are reaching for the old fraud John Maynard Keynes in times of trouble. The idea that if they just spent a bit more of the taxpayers money on their grand schemes everything will turn out just rosy is just to tempting.

“The chancellor has signalled he will use public spending to boost job-creating areas of the economy.”

source

Of course none of this will work but it will saddle future generations of taxpayers with huge obligations.

For those that doubt it look to the East. Japan’s miracle economy and joyous housing boom collapsed at the end of the ‘80s and 0% interest rates and letting government debt amount to about 170 percent of GDP did not prevent a decade or more of misery.

Things are going to be a lot worse than people imagine for a lot longer.

plasticpig

12,932 posts

255 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
To oppose that view. Look what Japan did in its post war reconstruction and the role of MITI.

speedy_thrills

7,956 posts

273 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
Fittster said:
Things are going to be a lot worse than people imagine for a lot longer.
I need statistics, what % of bad debt has been written down and at what cost? What rate is it likely to happen at?

While I don't dispute Japan being a valid case study we need to remember Japan has some unique charecteristics economically and socially that contributed to the Japanese asset price bubble ('86 - '90). I agree though, in principal, that this may hinder economic progress.

Fittster

Original Poster:

20,120 posts

243 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
plasticpig said:
To oppose that view. Look what Japan did in its post war reconstruction and the role of MITI.
The role of MITI being to inforce protectionism?

So,

Slash interest rates, spend taxpayers money on gaint white elephants to keep everyone busy and then move on to protectionism.

We can see the first signs of protectionism with labours new found desire to manage immigration.

If you don't like my example from Japan, how about the US in the 1930s, the New Deal was a great success. Although I suppose government spending for WW2 to get the economy moving.

Fittster

Original Poster:

20,120 posts

243 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
speedy_thrills said:
Fittster said:
Things are going to be a lot worse than people imagine for a lot longer.
I need statistics, what % of bad debt has been written down and at what cost? What rate is it likely to happen at?

While I don't dispute Japan being a valid case study we need to remember Japan has some unique charecteristics economically and socially that contributed to the Japanese asset price bubble ('86 - '90). I agree though, in principal, that this may hinder economic progress.
What are these unique charecteristics you speak of? A small island with a large property boom funded by debt perhaps?

"Take one popular myth, that Japan's property bubble was bigger than anyother. In reality, as the The Economist points out this week, Japanese house prices rose by just 51% between 1985 and 1991. That compares with a 90% jump in the US from 2000 to 2006, and a 118% surge in Britian between 2001 and 2007"

Source: Money Week 29th August 2008.

I'll try and dig out some more figures.

Edited by Fittster on Sunday 19th October 14:30

dilbert

7,741 posts

261 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
The sad reality is that the Labour party want to put the whole thing off until the Conservative party get in. The rationale being that it's going to give them more of a chance to get out of the doldrums eight years from now.

Gordo, and some of his mates think that they're still in with a chance of another term next time, so they're not going to just hand over to those that most people think are realy going to have to deal with all of this.

From what I've heard the Labour party is (loosely) considering a general election next spring. It doesn't matter much if they do or not. That they are thinking that way now is confirmation (IMO) of their absolute selfishness.

Edited by dilbert on Sunday 19th October 14:30

plasticpig

12,932 posts

255 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
Fittster said:
plasticpig said:
To oppose that view. Look what Japan did in its post war reconstruction and the role of MITI.
The role of MITI being to inforce protectionism?

So,

Slash interest rates, spend taxpayers money on gaint white elephants to keep everyone busy and then move on to protectionism.

We can see the first signs of protectionism with labours new found desire to manage immigration.

If you don't like my example from Japan, how about the US in the 1930s, the New Deal was a great success. Although I suppose government spending for WW2 to get the economy moving.
I was actually thinking of its role in investment in manufacturing, inroducing JIT concepts etc. As for the New Deal Keynes told Roosvelt he should spend more money. While the New Deal wasnt a total success it wasnt a total failure. Arguably the US and the UK could and should massively increase their spending on arms. The Iraq war and Afghanistan have worn out a hell of a lot of equipment.



Guybrush

4,364 posts

236 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
... and the government says it won't interfere in how the newly-nationilised banks are run... well, that lasted a few days before they were saying how they wanted the banks to go easy on reposessions and also to bring lending levels back to those of last year (thus proving the government were happy with the unwise lending going on - surely they understand that was one of the main problems). No, government interference is only going to get worse and they're looking for any excuse (creating situations too I suspect), for them to rack it up.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
After 10 years of Greedy Gordon's "prudent management of the economy" you can hardly expect him to change now!

At least he succeeded with his promise to have ended the boom/bust cycle.

Not.

OllieC

3,816 posts

244 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
you can only blame the public at large for being gullible enough for this to work...

Zod

35,295 posts

288 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
Labour's answer to a problem caused by years of bingeing on debt?

Yes, it's incur loads more debt.

It would be funny if it were not serious.

We will be paying for this for the rest of our lives.

speedy_thrills

7,956 posts

273 months

Sunday 19th October 2008
quotequote all
Fittster said:
speedy_thrills said:
Fittster said:
Things are going to be a lot worse than people imagine for a lot longer.
I need statistics, what % of bad debt has been written down and at what cost? What rate is it likely to happen at?

While I don't dispute Japan being a valid case study we need to remember Japan has some unique charecteristics economically and socially that contributed to the Japanese asset price bubble ('86 - '90). I agree though, in principal, that this may hinder economic progress.
What are these unique charecteristics you speak of? A small island with a large property boom funded by debt perhaps?.
Very low TFP growth (less than 1%) in the early 90's, low return on equity and assets, high leverage ratios, Losses in global market in the 90's, employment practices, and more.

The Nikkei 225 went over nearly 40,000 and 18 years later it's still at under 9000 (possibly less by the time you read this hehe). I duobt it will take us 18+ years to recover.

Fittster said:
"Take one popular myth, that Japan's property bubble was bigger than anyother. In reality, as the The Economist points out this week, Japanese house prices rose by just 51% between 1985 and 1991. That compares with a 90% jump in the US from 2000 to 2006, and a 118% surge in Britian between 2001 and 2007"

Source: Money Week 29th August 2008.

I'll try and dig out some more figures.
No doubt the property market will fall a lot more, the only way to support prices is to increase peoples income.

Fittster

Original Poster:

20,120 posts

243 months

Sunday 26th October 2008
quotequote all
The government's plan to spend its way out of the looming recession is "misguided and discredited", say leading economists.

Chancellor Alistair Darling wants to bring forward spending on key state-funded projects to kick-start economic recovery.

But a group of 16 economists say it risks damaging private sector recovery.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7691839.stm

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Sunday 26th October 2008
quotequote all
Fittster said:
The government's plan to spend its way out of the looming recession is "misguided and discredited", say leading economists.

Chancellor Alistair Darling wants to bring forward spending on key state-funded projects to kick-start economic recovery.

But a group of 16 economists say it risks damaging private sector recovery.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7691839.stm
Read that this morning.

Letter stops just short of calling him an incompetent buffoon.