Another physics question - aquaducts!
Another physics question - aquaducts!
Author
Discussion

aldi

Original Poster:

9,292 posts

268 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
Short but sweet: When a barge is travelling along an aquaduct, does any extra weight come to bear on the supports? Or is it just displacing water, giving no net gain?

wedg1e

27,043 posts

296 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
Well, even the displaced water has to go somewhere, so some of the force it exerts pushing other water out of the way will be transferred into a vertical load

From E=MC2 we can see that Einstein was barking...

Oh I don't bloody know, ask me something else

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,039 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
..depends is the fridge is full

Platinum

2,101 posts

254 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
www.skeptics.com.au/quiz/0406.htm

Does that answer the question?

rich 36

13,739 posts

297 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
displacement surely,
or how else would that barge lifting wheel thingy work

edtvr

319 posts

255 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
how long is the canal?

tvrbob

11,197 posts

286 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
The barge will displace an equal mass of water so theoretically there will be no extra mass. The reality is that the displaced water will need to flow away, therefore that extra mass will be there at first but will dissipate over time. If the barge is motionless then it would not add to the mass of the water, if it is in motion then it would alter the mass because it has a raised water level ahead of it, a lowered water level behind and the displaced water mass is in the process of dissipating. Overall the mass would be higher but less than the sum of both water and barge.

havoc

33,495 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
Yes.

Although water is displaced, the water displaced moves ahead-of and behind the barge. Therefore as it moves along the canal/aqueduct, there is a 'length' of water that is slightly higher than the original water level, therefore heavier.


But, except for maybe near-centre of the aqueduct, the additional load won't be as great as the mass of the barge.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,039 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
What about if there's a (shut) lock at each end?

hugoagogo

23,438 posts

264 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
the weight of the barge is spread over the whole length of the enclosed waterway

Pigeon

18,535 posts

277 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
hugoagogo said:
the weight of the barge is spread over the whole length of the enclosed waterway

Beat me to it

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,039 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
Pigeon said:
hugoagogo said:
the weight of the barge is spread over the whole length of the enclosed waterway

Beat me to it


..and therefore the weight is greater, by the weight of the barge

aldi

Original Poster:

9,292 posts

268 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
rich 36 said:
displacement surely,
or how else would that barge lifting wheel thingy work


Barge lifting wheel thingy???

So the general consesus seems to be 'no' or 'a little bit'... its kind of bizzare to imagine a big boat ontop of the thing and no extra force, it doesnt seem intuative at all. Whichcraft I say!

hugoagogo

23,438 posts

264 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
Pigeon said:
hugoagogo said:
the weight of the barge is spread over the whole length of the enclosed waterway

Beat me to it


..and therefore the weight is greater, by the weight of the barge


no, it increase the pressure, (psi, for example) on every square (underwater) inch of the waterway equally, so some of it goes in sideways force and some goes either end of the viaduct (up to where the next lock is) ((and i suppose some forces lengthways against the locks themselves))

>> Edited by hugoagogo on Sunday 29th January 21:50

lord summerisle

8,174 posts

256 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
untill the water level rises above the bypasses, and the exess water flows away...

hugoagogo

23,438 posts

264 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
lord summerisle said:
untill the water level rises above the bypasses, and the exess water flows away...

yeah, plus this ^

SuPaSpArK

2,105 posts

269 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
Archimedes Law of Buoyancy- Buoyancy is equal to the amount of weight displaced!
Therefor: A neutral point is achieved as the barge sits in the water and no extra weight is applied to the structure.
As the barge moved the lateral forces would nominal.
Supes.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,039 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
SuPaSpArK said:
Glyn's Law of Bollox- Buoyancy is equal to the amount of weight displaced!
Therefor: A neutral point is achieved as the barge sits in the water and no extra weight is applied to the structure.
As the barge moved the lateral forces would nominal.
Supes.

SuPaSpArK

2,105 posts

269 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
Your going down brother like that in barge......

hugoagogo

23,438 posts

264 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
SuPaSpArK said:
Archimedes Law of Buoyancy- Buoyancy is equal to the amount of weight displaced!
Therefor: A neutral point is achieved as the barge sits in the water and no extra weight is applied to the structure.


pish, even assuming all the water was at sea level connected to the oceans, it would increase the load on all the whole ocean's floors by an infitesimal amount

how much water the boat displaces is irrelevant