ASA says Jamster Ad's against the law
ASA says Jamster Ad's against the law
Author
Discussion

Munter

Original Poster:

31,331 posts

271 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
If you read the following document it appears that the ASA has slapped the wrists of jamster (Aka those F***ing crazy frog people)
http://www.asa.org.uk/NR/rdonlyres/7E094194-311C-4B2E-8766-787DE19E30E2/0/Broadcast_report_21_Sept_2005.pdf

alexkp

16,484 posts

274 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
They were operating a very sharp practice and knew exactly what they were doing.

What amazes me the most is their claim that their ads are not targetted at children but "their content services were targetted at the 18-49 market, and a recent internal survey had show that their average customer was 32.6 years old."

This must be total cobblers - AVERAGE age? So for every 14yr old there must be a customer of near pensionable age....

Utter rubbish. They are rip off merchants preying on kids - simple as that IMO.

MrsRotty

637 posts

261 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
Very interesting - Jamster claims that the ads are not aimed at under 16's - he should hear my 7 year old and his friends - they think Crazy Frog is cool, and pestered me to buy the single/t shirts etc. Needless to say, the answer was not what they wanted to hear!

JonRB

80,061 posts

302 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
MrsRotty said:
Very interesting - Jamster claims that the ads are not aimed at under 16's - he should hear my 7 year old and his friends - they think Crazy Frog is cool, and pestered me to buy the single/t shirts etc.
Indeed. My almost-11 year-old son also thinks that Crazy Frog is cool and bought the Crazy Frog Axel-F single (with his own money - nothing I could do about it) and has the Crazy Frog screen-saver on his computer.

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

273 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


Kids can't get phone contracts. The phone contract is in the parent's name. What's the average age of a parent of 7-16 year olds?

....probably 32.6.

venom

1,864 posts

289 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
Bingo.

alexkp

16,484 posts

274 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
bosscerbera said:

anonymous said:
[redacted]



Kids can't get phone contracts. The phone contract is in the parent's name. What's the average age of a parent of 7-16 year olds?

....probably 32.6.


Excellent point. Of course lots of kids have pay as you go, and Jamster have been happily emptying their cards for some while now...

MrsRotty

637 posts

261 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
Recently transporting our 7yo and his classmate in the car - said classmate starts singing Axel F/Crazy Frog. my som immediately pipes up, "We don't sing Crazy Frog in our car." Friend says nothing...but shuts up!!

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

273 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]



Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the parent still have to sign something for PAYG phones for minors? Ergo doesn't the parent STILL appear to be 'the Customer'?

Edited to add: from what I've heard, Jamster has resulted in many kids losing their credit - repeatedly - on their phones resulting in the phone/SIM card being junked by the parents. Parent-funded contract phones I reckon are the main source of Jamster income. They would still contribute to 'average customer age' even if they've pulled the plug on the phones since.

Average customer age doesn't say 'delighted, retained customer'.

>> Edited by bosscerbera on Wednesday 21st September 11:33

alexkp

16,484 posts

274 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
MrsRotty said:
Recently transporting our 7yo and his classmate in the car - said classmate starts singing Axel F/Crazy Frog. my som immediately pipes up, "We don't sing Crazy Frog in our car." Friend says nothing...but shuts up!!



Excellent. PLay them some Bach instead.

Mind you, my little girl currently seems to like the Tom Jones Reloaded Album - which is excellent it has to be said.

plfrench

4,917 posts

298 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
These bloomin mobile phone ringtone ads drive me up the wall, why the hell would you want your phone to sound like a car alarm or some animals farting or whatever else they offer and then pay some extorsionate amount of money for it??? No self respecting person over the age of 12 would buy this rubbish, it can only possibly appeal to kids and perhaps the mentally unstable.

The sooner the ASA ban these ads the better.

Paul.

wiggy001

7,367 posts

301 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
Supply and demand I'm afraid.

Don't agree with banning them though just because they're annoying...

MrsRotty

637 posts

261 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


Currently we are playing Linkin Park, ACDC and Gorillaz - with a bit of Wings thrown in!

gh0st

4,693 posts

288 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
I notice they have also come down hard on the frequency of the ads - Excellent!! I really dont watch TV much at all but whenever i did, there it was!! Nearly every advert!!

grrr

nobs

JonRB

80,061 posts

302 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
MrsRotty said:
Currently we are playing Linkin Park, ACDC and Gorillaz - with a bit of Wings thrown in!
If that isn't a fair approximation of a dictionary definition of the word "eclectic" then I don't know what is.

mr_tony

6,351 posts

299 months

Wednesday 21st September 2005
quotequote all
given that they've made a good proportion of the 750,000,000 quid this country has spent on ringtones this year, one would hope that they get slapped with a monumental fine that gets used for something useful instead!



>> Edited by mr_tony on Wednesday 21st September 17:12