Call for royals to meet police cost
Call for royals to meet police cost
Author
Discussion

Mrs Fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

287 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
ananova said:
Call for royals to meet police cost

Financial trouble has hit the royal wedding with calls for Buckingham Palace to contribute to the cost of policing Saturday's event.

The wedding was put back by 24 hours to enable the Prince of Wales to travel to Rome for Pope John Paul II's funeral on Friday.

His marriage to Camilla Parker Bowles will now take place at 12.30pm on Saturday instead.

The move has disrupted the racing world with Aintree organisers deciding to delay the start of the world famous Grand National by 25 minutes to 4.10pm.

And the postponement has also caused a considerable headache for those trying to police the wedding in Windsor, with many officers having to work when they should have been on a day off.

Hundreds of officers from the Metropolitan Police and the Thames Valley force will be deployed in a huge joint operation headed by Commander Bob Broadhurst.

There was yet more trouble for the Royal Family when it emerged that two intruders broke into the private area of Windsor Castle just days before the royal wedding.

Scotland Yard refused to confirm reports that police officers would have to be paid overtime at twice their normal shift rate - possibly doubling the cost of the policing operation.

But Sally Hannon, chairwoman of the Thames Valley Police Authority, said the date change would be costly and she hoped Buckingham Palace would make some contribution to help cover the additional cost.

"It's normal for police authorities, when they have large events like this, to ask for extra funds," she said. "We probably will ask the palace for a contribution because, though we don't know the actual amount yet, it is likely to be large."




"Too right they should foot the bill".

I've seen the error of my ways on this already, I wasn't particularly thinking it through before typing a reply.

I have nothing against Charlie boy and Camilla getting married, I hope he is finally happy.

JagLover

46,738 posts

264 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
I don't think so Mrs Fish

Like them or loath them they are the heads of state and in fullfilling this fuction they are a target.

If we had a president-if he got married we would have to foot the security bill.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
Absolutely not, not for one minute.

He will be king one day, for the proliteriate to call for the payment of a piffling sum I find in remarkably bad taste.

People want to go and show their support for a royal wedding. They bring in far more than in tourism annually than they will spend on the policing this one event.

Besides it will be a novelty to see a copper in Windsor as after a 20% rise in Council Tax just for the Police I have been wondering where that money has gone...

Mrs Fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

287 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
I guess I'm gonna be outnumbered on this one

Donut

4,521 posts

280 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:
I don't think so Mrs Fish

Like them or loath them they are the heads of state and in fullfilling this fuction they are a target.

If we had a president-if he got married we would have to foot the security bill.


NO!! cause then that money could be spent a new comunity center



sorry couldn't help myself!

mechsympathy

58,556 posts

284 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
It's an interesting question: On the one hand there's a need for more police because of the wedding, on the other it's not their fault there'll be massive crowds and a potential terrorist threat. I'm sure they'd rather everyone fked off and left them to it.

I think Bin Laden should pay

(And did the royals contribute for his first wedding? Probably not, cos Diana was wonderful and no-one minded)

bruciebabe

1,126 posts

270 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
It's not his fault the Pope died.
Really the press are disgusting, they should cut Charlie some slack, especially on his wedding day.

wolves_wanderer

12,952 posts

266 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
bruciebabe said:
It's not his fault the Pope died.
Really the press are disgusting, they should cut Charlie some slack, especially on his wedding day.


Donut

4,521 posts

280 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
bruciebabe said:
It's not his fault the Pope died.




I'm sure the News of the World is working on that as we speak!!

It is a shame that just because the lady that has won Charlies heart looks like a horse they are getting a press flogging!

Mrs Fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

287 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:



Besides it will be a novelty to see a copper in Windsor as after a 20% rise in Council Tax just for the Police I have been wondering where that money has gone...


[devils advocate mode]

Even if they put another Council Tax rise on the next one to compensate for having to overspend for the wedding?

[/devils advocate mode]

birdbrain

1,564 posts

268 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
Mrs Fish said:
I guess I'm gonna be outnumbered on this one


Actually, I agree. I don't see why the taxpayer should fund them at all.

piquet

671 posts

286 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
i'm with mrs fish, he should pay, unless eh doesn;t want to, in which case he gets no security especially since he changed the date, he did not have to go to the popes funeral, we are not a catholic country and he is not head of state

it is my understanding that footbal grounds and rock concerts have to pay towards the policing costs ( personally i think they should pay for all of them) the probelm with the royals is they want to be both public and private figures, you can't have it both ways, like when philip complained that windsor castle was a public building and so had no insurance and so the public should pay for it's reapir when it was burnt down. Well if it belongs to the state, you owe us rent if it belongs to the royal family, you owe us inheritance tax on it

i know people say if we had a president, we'd have to pay, but we would have choosen him/her and they wpould have had to have gone to the popes funeral

i am trying desperately to try and resist makeing a joke about camilla being the reason the grand national

the only royals i have time for are the queen and pincess anne, who do seem to kind of get it, but all th others seem to think animal farm is a handbook of how they should behave

nonegreen

7,803 posts

299 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
The parasite Charles Windsor should pay, but then of course he can't cos he gets all him money off us in the first place. Of course, if the Bibs get more pay for Saturday rather than Friday then the Catholic Church should cough up the difference or have their assets sequestrated. All this wedding crap should not be allowed to interupt an important event like the Grand National. Time for a republic I don't want that petulant little parasite as head of state, or his son.

Donut

4,521 posts

280 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
piquet said:
the only royals i have time for are the queen and pincess anne, who do seem to kind of get it, but all th others seem to think animal farm is a handbook of how they should behave


A little OTT!!

Prince Charles should be King now and if your animal farm comments refer to his to sons then remember when you where a teenager...they have done nothing that i didn't/still do...the only difference is i didn't the worlds press following me round waiting for me to drop a bollock!!

hedders

24,460 posts

276 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
nonegreen said:
The parasite Charles Windsor should pay, but then of course he can't cos he gets all him money off us in the first place.


Surely this is getting to the crux of the matter...does it matter who pays for it? In the end the money will come out of our pockets.

esselte

14,626 posts

296 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
nonegreen said:
The parasite Charles Windsor should pay, but then of course he can't cos he gets all him money off us in the first place.


Thought he got it from the Duchy of Cornwall?

www.royal.gov.uk/output/page316.asp

nonegreen

7,803 posts

299 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
esselte said:

nonegreen said:
The parasite Charles Windsor should pay, but then of course he can't cos he gets all him money off us in the first place.



Thought he got it from the Duchy of Cornwall?

www.royal.gov.uk/output/page316.asp


so his ancestor batters the peasants into submission and as a result Charlie gets an income from it. As far as I am concerned this is not legitimate. The duchy of Cornwall belongs to the public, just like all the so called Royal assets.

c c

8,048 posts

268 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
Charles is not the head of state (yet).
He’s had one wedding on the tax payer. Time to cough up on this one.

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
mechsympathy said:

(And did the royals contribute for his first wedding? Probably not, cos Diana was wonderful and no-one minded)




I never liked the stupid cow.....queen of Hearts, stupid tart more like....

( Still a nasty ending for her though )



>> Edited by Graham on Wednesday 6th April 11:04

mrmaggit

10,146 posts

277 months

Wednesday 6th April 2005
quotequote all
Well they get the army bands and guardsmen for nothing, so why not the police too.