Sikh Theatre storming - not good

Sikh Theatre storming - not good

Author
Discussion

alexkp

Original Poster:

16,484 posts

251 months

Sunday 19th December 2004
quotequote all
This can't be good. Although most were peaceful I don't think they have the right to demand censorship over the Arts.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/4107437.stm

Eric Mc

122,858 posts

272 months

Sunday 19th December 2004
quotequote all
Don't worry, this type of thing won't be possible in the future. This play would have been banned under the proposed government legislation which prohibits performances which might possibly, maybe, perhaps, be likely to, possibly upset someone's religious sensibilities - possibly.

Isn't it nice to know that our government are looking after us so well.

motco

16,230 posts

253 months

Sunday 19th December 2004
quotequote all
Will plays about adultery be banned? Probably, but only if they feature a sef-righteous cabinet minister.

Eric Mc

122,858 posts

272 months

Sunday 19th December 2004
quotequote all
I would hazard a guess that the word "banned" has cropped up the most number of times, in more new legislation, introduced or expected to be introduced, by this government than at any other time in British history - with the exception of possibly Oliver Cromwell's reign.

apache

39,731 posts

291 months

Sunday 19th December 2004
quotequote all
Last year it was reported that the Blair posse had introduced over 700 new laws, most of em pointless or unenforcable probably

mechsympathy

54,269 posts

262 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Birmingham, the Most Reverend Vincent Nichols, said: "Such a deliberate, even if fictional, violation of the sacred place of the Sikh religion demeans the sacred places of every religion."

[deepbreath][countsto10]

If it's fiction then nobody has violated anything.

[continuescounting]

einion yrth

19,575 posts

251 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Birmingham the Most Reverend Vincent Nichols said:
"Such a deliberate, even if fictional, violation of the sacred place of the Sikh religion demeans the sacred places of every religion."

einion yrth said:
Here's 10p; go phone someone who could give a stuff.

cotty

40,323 posts

291 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
mechsympathy said:

[deepbreath][countsto10]

If it's fiction then nobody has violated anything.

[continuescounting]


are you talking about the play or religion

mechsympathy

54,269 posts

262 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all

The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Birmingham the Most Reverend Vincent Nichols said:
We object to this work of fiction because it insults our work of...oh er...It's blasphemous because we say it is.

DustyC

12,820 posts

261 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Don't worry, this type of thing won't be possible in the future. This play would have been banned under the proposed government legislation which prohibits performances which might possibly, maybe, perhaps, be likely to, possibly upset someone's religious sensibilities - possibly.

Isn't it nice to know that our government are looking after us so well.


Yep, won't be long till the world is just like it is in "Demolition Man".

Taco Bell anyone?!

The Wiz

5,875 posts

269 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
The concept of banning anything on religious grounds is fundamentally wrong. This is (supposedly though I do have my doubts) a free country and everyone has the right to question and challenge all views whether political or religious. We should accept and respect other people's beliefs but we should not be forced to change our lives so that they can dictate how we should think.

It's not like people are forced to go and watch this play. If you don't like the content then stay away. Whatever happened to freedom of speech in this country?

Considering that the play was actually written by a Sikh and the producers at every step have tried to keep everybody in the loop I don't see why there's such a problem. People are too sensitive over what is "just a play". If the play is banned then it's nothing more than another notch in the belt of those who don't like the concept freedom of speech.

sadako

7,080 posts

245 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
Reminds me of another incident.

...He's not the messiah, he's a very naughty boy...

Same crap, different wrapper.

Eric Mc

122,858 posts

272 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
The theatre has decided to pull the play "on safety grounds".

A bad day for freedom of speech and expression in this country.

DustyC

12,820 posts

261 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
Lets protest until the play is back on!

The Wiz

5,875 posts

269 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
Wouldn't make any difference ... you'd simply be accused of racism.

DustyC

12,820 posts

261 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
Ok then, lets protest that banning should be banned.

Marki

15,763 posts

277 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
DustyC said:
Lets protest until the play is back on!


Thats the Spirit DustyC

Pickled Piper

6,387 posts

242 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
Joking apart it is very sad indeed. The whole intent of the play was to demonstrate that the laudible and basic tenets of Sikhism such as sex equality, charity and protection of the oppressed amongst others have been forgotten and disregarded in place of "Public Honour".

Why exactly are some members of the Sikh community protesting? Because they feel the play publically insults them and their place of worship. However, I'm sure the irony is lost on the lynch mob waiting outside the theatre.

pp




















lunarscope

2,895 posts

249 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
Fking religious loonies worried about upsetting their invisible friend.

Dakkon

7,826 posts

260 months

Monday 20th December 2004
quotequote all
lunarscope said:
Fking religious loonies worried about upsetting their invisible friend.


Well said, could not have put it better myself, people need to grow up and stop being so insecure.