Digging people up...

Author
Discussion

sccbishop

Original Poster:

8,800 posts

289 months

Sunday 12th December 2004
quotequote all
How long does someone need to be dead and buried before it is deemed acceptable to dig them up again for historical research?

For example, the programme on 5 this evening televised live the uncovering of mummies. They couldn't exactly do that at your local graveyard. So, is it 100 years? 500 years?

Zorro

4,474 posts

289 months

Monday 13th December 2004
quotequote all
Have you got a deal going with motco to supply a skeleton ?

wedg1e

26,891 posts

272 months

Monday 13th December 2004
quotequote all
The council built a new bypass here a few years ago. The route took it through an ancient churchyard, they unearthed shedloads of bones of Plague vitims. As far as I recall they first had to make pretty certain that no records could be found that could link the bits to living people.

Then they dug the lot up and land-filled it somewhere

Plague was prevalent what, 350 years ago?

docevi1

10,430 posts

255 months

Monday 13th December 2004
quotequote all
they did the same in Newcastle with the Centre of Life. The land it's built on used to be a mass-burial ground for the local hospital during some recent mass infection which killed hundreds. Ironic the name of the centre in reality.

I personally think the dead should be left alone and hate it when programs like Time Team focus on digging up someone's body. It's strange as I don't for one second believe in an after-live, God, the devil or anything with even remote religious pretensions but playing with someone's body is just plain wrong IMO. How strange!