Ritz phone gang can keep £1.3m

Ritz phone gang can keep £1.3m

Author
Discussion

Bodo

Original Poster:

12,421 posts

273 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,4484-1390808,00.html
article said:
Ritz phone gang can keep £1.3m roulette winnings

CASINOS across Britain were reviewing their security last night after three gamblers who used a mobile phone to win more than a £1 million at the Ritz were allowed to keep their takings.

A device in the phone allegedly enabled them to predict the outcome of every spin of a roulette wheel. But Scotland Yard has decided that there is no ground to prosecute the gamblers and refunded them the “significant” quantity of cash which officers seized after their arrest. The group, described as a “chic and beautiful” Hungarian woman, 32, and two “elegant” Serbian men, aged 33 and 38, had been on police bail for nine months but are free to leave the country.

A Scotland Yard spokesman said last night: “They have been informed that no further action will be taken and that the inquiry has ended.”

The three were arrested in March this year after the Ritz casino management reviewed CCTV footage and called in police. They had won £1.3 million over two nights at the popular haunt for Arab princes and international playboys.

On their first night they took home £100,000. The following evening they returned and won £1.2 million. They were handed £300,000 in cash and a cheque for £900,000. They were alleged to have had a laser scanner inside a mobile phone linked to a microcomputer. The scanner measured the speed of the roulette ball as the croupier released it, identified where it fell and measured the declining orbit of the wheel.

The data was beamed to the microcomputer, which ran through thousands of possible outcomes to forecast which section numbers the ball would land on. This data was flashed on to the screen of the phone just before the wheel made its third spin, by which time all bets must be placed.

Having reduced their odds of winning from 37-1 to 6-1, the trio placed bets on all six numbers in the section where the ball would end up.

Legal sources said that the gamblers had not broken any law because their scanner did not interfere with the ball or the roulette wheel.
True or not?

Rico

7,916 posts

262 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
I've seen the same story on a few other news websites so i assume its true

simpo two

87,078 posts

272 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
Yep, on R4 as well.

Said the phone had a scanner in it which they used to predict when/where the wheel would stop.

Pigeon

18,535 posts

253 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
Well done the phone gang. All they were doing is making the best use of the information available to them. Same as that bunch who were on TV the other week having found a way to swing the odds of blackjack(?) in their favour by keeping track of what cards had already been played. (See also "Masters of the Vortex" )

It really annoys me the way casinos try and grab the moral high ground and label these people cheats. They're not cheats - they're playing by the rules, just using more of the available information to make good choices guided by those rules. It is the casinos' response - labelling them cheats because they're better at the game than the casinos - which is dishonourable.

andygo

6,955 posts

262 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
Mint.

alexkp

16,484 posts

251 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
The odds are seriously stacked in favour of the Casinos on all games - yet no one accuses them of cheating...lol

I have no problem with this if it was not illegal.

Sounds almost too clever to be true though - I am struggling to see how even with the technology the article decribes - and I'm not totally sure such technology exists or could be fitted in a phone - the behaviour of a roulette ball would surely be unpredictable as it is truly an example of chaos theory in action.

In My Humble Opinion.

rpguk

4,484 posts

291 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
Pigeon said:
Well done the phone gang. All they were doing is making the best use of the information available to them. Same as that bunch who were on TV the other week having found a way to swing the odds of blackjack(?) in their favour by keeping track of what cards had already been played. (See also "Masters of the Vortex" )

It really annoys me the way casinos try and grab the moral high ground and label these people cheats. They're not cheats - they're playing by the rules, just using more of the available information to make good choices guided by those rules. It is the casinos' response - labelling them cheats because they're better at the game than the casinos - which is dishonourable.


Thanks, you've just written my post for me

jjr1

3,027 posts

267 months

Monday 6th December 2004
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]


The probability of where the ball might end and in which particular quartile is a well known mathematical formula that uses rotation of the wheel speed and ball velocity as 2 components. The ingenious part is that although many people could calculate the formula by the time they would have done the ball would have stopped

Thus these guys just found a way of doing it quickly enough to benefit. A work of genius and they should be applauded not regarded as criminals, as the casino's would dearly love them to be.

benmc

537 posts

255 months

Tuesday 7th December 2004
quotequote all
You might want to read

The Newtonian Casino
Thomas A. Bass

I story of how some computer geeks in the US built a computer to do this a number of years ago. A great book

This book retells the theoretical and technical breakthroughs made by a group of people into the gambling systems of American casinos. It follows their attempts to solve the complex physics of roulette, which leads them to invent microprocessors that fit into shoes, to use toe switches and body sensors to relay information, and ultimately to make their assault on the gambling palaces of Las Vegas. Along the way the reader is given an insight into the cutting edge of computer science: on chaos theory, strange attractors, and other concepts in contemporary physics: on the history of roulette and the many different systems devised over the years for beating the odds at all sorts of games of chance.

ben

ledger

1,063 posts

290 months

Tuesday 7th December 2004
quotequote all
benmc said:
You might want to read

The Newtonian Casino
Thomas A. Bass

I story of how some computer geeks in the US built a computer to do this a number of years ago. A great book

This book retells the theoretical and technical breakthroughs made by a group of people into the gambling systems of American casinos. It follows their attempts to solve the complex physics of roulette, which leads them to invent microprocessors that fit into shoes, to use toe switches and body sensors to relay information, and ultimately to make their assault on the gambling palaces of Las Vegas. Along the way the reader is given an insight into the cutting edge of computer science: on chaos theory, strange attractors, and other concepts in contemporary physics: on the history of roulette and the many different systems devised over the years for beating the odds at all sorts of games of chance.

ben


I just checked this out on Amazon £22 in paperback :-(

benmc

537 posts

255 months

Tuesday 7th December 2004
quotequote all
Ouch £22. It is a good book but I am not sure it is worth that much!

benmc

537 posts

255 months

Tuesday 7th December 2004
quotequote all
Ouch £22. It is a good book but I am not sure it is worth that much!

Incorrigible

13,668 posts

268 months

Tuesday 7th December 2004
quotequote all
benmc said:
Ouch £22. It is a good book but I am not sure it is worth that much!
If it teaches you how to make £1.3m then I would say £22 is a bloody bargain

sparkythecat

7,961 posts

262 months

Tuesday 7th December 2004
quotequote all
Incorrigible said:

benmc said:
Ouch £22. It is a good book but I am not sure it is worth that much!

If it teaches you how to make £1.3m then I would say £22 is a bloody bargain


Yes but if you know how to make that sort of money, why would you waste your time writing a book about it ?

benmc

537 posts

255 months

Tuesday 7th December 2004
quotequote all
I think it tells you how in the 70s or 80s a group of people worked out the maths of this and then build a computer in the bottom of thier shoes to beat the wheel!!

Good book

ben