Anti 'old car' PC lunacy

Author
Discussion

ADP68

Original Poster:

528 posts

177 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/8552121.s...
Can you believe these idiots? Words just fail me. It's as if 'recycling' doesn't mean anything anymore.

anonymous-user

60 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
That is simply stupid!

Matt UK

17,939 posts

206 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
The key word behind the stupidity is 'council'

a8hex

5,830 posts

229 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
When are these total cretins going to realise that making cars is highly polluting. For many people it is far more eco friendly to continue to use the cars that have already been made.

MX7

7,902 posts

180 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
Rules made by people who don't know anything about cars.

nc107

465 posts

214 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
I find that it's useful to have something (say about every couple of years or so) to help you re-calibrate your stupid stick. Councils are usually a good barometer for "stupid" and it's comforting to know that we haven't been let down. Somewhere there will be a local government KPI for "stupid" and Teignbridge District Council are probably at this moment congratulating themselves on ensuring no more entries are required for March.

Doofus

27,951 posts

179 months

Friday 5th March 2010
quotequote all
Coucils employ people to do this kind of thing!

I hope these people can sleep at night.

It makes my brain explode!

ShadownINja

77,404 posts

288 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
Pro-greenies just don't think. Every initiative (light bulbs, Priuses, solar panels etc) has big downsides.

Balmoral Green

41,630 posts

254 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
ShadownINja said:
Pro-greenies just don't think.
I disagree, they do think, but just not deeply enough.

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

223 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
Doofus said:
We employ people to do this kind of thing!

I hope these people can sleep at night.

It makes my brain explode!
EFA, anybody in that area needs to contact their councillor and make him/her aware of the negative impression this sort of st creates of them

Edited by AndrewW-G on Saturday 6th March 11:00

lowdrag

13,025 posts

219 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
For me the worst stupidity at the moment is the Prius type cars. Yes, very "ecological" but if you take into account where the batteries are made then the cost of transporting them and that the car will have a life span of maximum 10 year before replacing the batteries is more expensive than the value of the car then long term they are disadvantageous for the "global warming" which hasn't even been proven yet. They want to get the economy working again but it is all PC speak. In other words a damned pack of lies.

B3njamin

1,129 posts

193 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
Perhaps this is a little bit clever really - They are scrapping the free parking and it could be argued they slipped
this eco-nonsense in to divert attention away from the fact that everyone will be charged to park there from now on regardless of what they drive.

pacman1

7,323 posts

199 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
B3njamin said:
Perhaps this is a little bit clever really - They are scrapping the free parking and it could be argued they slipped
this eco-nonsense in to divert attention away from the fact that everyone will be charged to park there from now on regardless of what they drive.
Yes, I'd say so.
However, if councils are going to start targeting older, more polluting but legal vehicles, South Glos and Bristol better put most of their buses on the list.

Engineer1

10,486 posts

215 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
ShadownINja said:
Pro-greenies just don't think.
I disagree, they do think, but just not deeply enough.
What ever they do they fail to see the big picture. or do a true calculation of the cradle to grave carbon footprint, I bet a 10 year old car has a smaller footprint than a brand new eco car. Also isn't the rule change a way to get people into the emissions based taxation system.

RedexR

1,861 posts

220 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
This craving for newer eco-cars is starting to get out of hand , if they really want to save energy they need to start thinking about re-conditioning/restoring some cars from the nineties not just scrap everything that's over ten years old and penalise anybody who does not own the latest Prius type car , it really beggars belief.

Jalopnik

1,271 posts

224 months

Saturday 6th March 2010
quotequote all
RedexR said:
This craving for newer eco-cars is starting to get out of hand , if they really want to save energy they need to start thinking about re-conditioning/restoring some cars from the nineties not just scrap everything that's over ten years old and penalise anybody who does not own the latest Prius type car , it really beggars belief.
Ah, but if we don't all buy eco-motion-hybrid-pedal cars then Winky and the Badger won't get all there VAT and sales taxes will they? wink

Pothole

34,367 posts

288 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
"Council leader Alan Connett said comments from the unions and staff meant the council was "not likely to proceed with the two-tier charging system"."

but don't let it get in the way of your pointless rant, chaps

RedexR

1,861 posts

220 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
This kind of thing always rings an alarm bell , when a council wants to implement something that they know will be unpopular they tend to put out a far reaching proposal knowing it will be knocked back , standby for the compromise or half measure real intention , a "reduction" of something for anyone with the latest gee frizz eco car or penalty in some form for anybody daring to make something ten years old or more last a bit longer than the deemed scrap by date.

Doofus

27,951 posts

179 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
Pothole said:
don't let it get in the way of your pointless rant, chaps
Now hang on, Grumpy. First; I for one didn't read the article, so I can rant as pointlessly as I like. Second; doesn't that quote raise another question about why the story was reported at all?

ADP68

Original Poster:

528 posts

177 months

Monday 8th March 2010
quotequote all
I didn't read down that far, just got annoyed at the first few lines and did a Victor