Building the 'cars that should have been made'

Building the 'cars that should have been made'

Author
Discussion

Twincam16

Original Poster:

27,646 posts

264 months

Saturday 12th December 2009
quotequote all
A few months ago I was on the phone to a Triumph 2.5PI owner who was playing with the idea of creating a Triumph Stag estate. Not the Del Lines Atlantic Garage Stag Estate (basically a Stag 3-litre V8 in a 2.5PI estate), but a Triumph Stag with an extended roofline chopped from a replacement roof panel for the estate, blended into the Carbodies' kamm-tail to make a neat 3-door Stag shooting-brake.

I've long held a similar notion of building 'the car Ford should have built' - the Lotus Capri. Most people wanting to modify a Capri go for the big-block Mustang V8 installation, or at least carry out their modifications on a V6 model, but I've had this idea of getting hold of a 1.6-litre (either Mk II S or Mk III LS to get the authentic Lotus Cortina-style suspension options) Capri and transplanting a Cosworth 1588cc twin-cam, yellow Minilites, a pair of spotlights, a wood-rimmed Mountney steering wheel, then splashing on a Lotus Cortina-style green-over-white paint scheme (if it didn't already have the Mk II S 'JPS' colours) and doing some classic road-rallying.

I just think that Ford missed a trick. They put that Lotus engine in the Cortina and the Escort, but never in the sportiest, most aerodynamic car to use that platform.

Who else has a 'car that should have been built' project in mind?

restoman

949 posts

214 months

Saturday 12th December 2009
quotequote all
Triumph should have put the Sprint engine in the TR7 (though it did eventually get the V8).

Humber should have put the V8 they used in the Tiger in the Sceptre as well. (actually they did, as well as the Super Snipe but then abandoned the idea).

VW should have put a fully tuned Porsche engine in the Beetle (probably too scared 'cause the Beetle's handling was already st) and in the bus.

MG should NEVER have put the 6 cylinder C series n the 'B' but should have got around to fitting the V8 long before Frank Costello did.

and...


and...


and...



Edited by restoman on Saturday 12th December 19:47

52classic

2,629 posts

216 months

Saturday 12th December 2009
quotequote all
One of my 'round tuit' ideas was to put a Volvo 245GLT body onto a 4X4 Toyota pick up chassis.

'A' bar at the front to protect some low level lamps. Nice set of say 17" wheels - maybe 5 spoke to hold the GLT theme.

FraserLFA

5,083 posts

180 months

Saturday 12th December 2009
quotequote all
The Batmobile

RedexR

1,861 posts

220 months

Saturday 12th December 2009
quotequote all
Another Dagenham dream I'm afraid , as I only use mine in the Summer - Air Con , most people go for the five speed conversion or bigger engine. I would just love to have some cool air whilst I am perched on black vinyl seats in August , I believe American cars had it in the fifties and sixties, not even the export model (South Africa etc) Tina's and Escorts ever had it , I've always wondered what the is the simplest system that could be grafted into a sixties saloon like mine.

BMWChris

2,022 posts

205 months

Sunday 13th December 2009
quotequote all
RedexR said:
Another Dagenham dream I'm afraid , as I only use mine in the Summer - Air Con , most people go for the five speed conversion or bigger engine. I would just love to have some cool air whilst I am perched on black vinyl seats in August , I believe American cars had it in the fifties and sixties, not even the export model (South Africa etc) Tina's and Escorts ever had it , I've always wondered what the is the simplest system that could be grafted into a sixties saloon like mine.
There are firms that can do it. A freind got a quote for a 2002 for, I think, about £1300 but you'd think you'd be able to get all the bits of a scrapper and do it yourself but I rarely find people who have.

Furyblade_Lee

4,112 posts

230 months

Sunday 13th December 2009
quotequote all
A bit newer... Butback in the early 1990's Rover should have dropped the 160bhp 1800cc VVC K-series into the 1.4K Metro GTi. Having driven a Talon Sportscars conversion I can honestly say (coupled with the suspension / chassis tweaks they do) that they would have created something legendary, on track it can show a clean pair of heels to a lower-spec Elise. A Clio 172 would not get a sniff or it.

Simes205

4,622 posts

234 months

Sunday 13th December 2009
quotequote all
The 16v engine from the 405MI16 into the 205#gti - should have been a factory job.
Would have given them 160bhp in a 900kg car in 1991. smile



a8hex

5,830 posts

229 months

Sunday 13th December 2009
quotequote all
restoman said:
Triumph should have put the Sprint engine in the TR7 (though it did eventually get the V8).
They did, there were a few TR7 Sprints built.

m9fdb

24 posts

187 months

Sunday 13th December 2009
quotequote all
triumph built a fast back and it is still going now

http://www.triumphstag.net/images/history/fastprot...

grahamw48

9,944 posts

244 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
Hmmm...a Triumph Stag/GT6. biggrin

grahamw48

9,944 posts

244 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
Back in the seventies I wanted my Cortina 2000GXL to be faster than the others, so I put a Capri 3 litre V6 in it and beefed up the suspension. Actually made a really nice usable car. smile

richw_82

992 posts

192 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
For me it would have to be the AJ6 powered version of the XJ6... and by XJ6 I mean the original S1 - S3 not the XJ40. I know that there were a couple of test mules built, but never a production version, which is a real shame.

I loved my S3, but hated the fact that the XK engine was getting so dated and the three speed auto box killed what was left of legendary performance. I loved the shape, and the last bits of a real old style interior.

I hated the boxy shape and clunkiness of the XJ40, but loved the engine and performance.

So, I have a spare XJ6 kicking about so it's getting a 4.0litre AJ6 in it. The car is a S2 saloon, which isn't really evolving a S3 but I think its the prettiest of the bunch next to the Coupe. I'd like to use a supercharged AJ16S engine, but I think that would be pushing it a bit.

Regards

Ric

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

196 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
I reckon Triumph/BL missed a trick with the TR7 V8 as in never making a proper high performance version.

I know they missed many a trick already but surely something like this would have promoted the entire brand and in it's day probably shaken up the industry.

Essentially they had a good chassis and a car with striking looks. It was also rwd and they had a pretty desecent V8 to play with.

So why on Earth did they not think to introduce a 230-250hp variant with updated suspension, brakes and more sleek styling. For the most part it would have been bolt on additions, something even a dealer could have done if not at the factory. So minimal r&d and tooling requirements.

In return BL could have had a sports car with Ferrari Dino (or better) rivaling performance way back in the midish 70's.

lowdrag

13,025 posts

219 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
Perhaps a car that WAS built but which disappeared was the Lotus type 47 Europa built for GKN in 1969. Instead of the usual engine it was fitted with a Rover 3.5 litre V8. It was registered GKN 47 D and I wonder if it still exists? It sure must have beena fun car! I have a photo of it here.

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

188 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
Simes205 said:
The 16v engine from the 405MI16 into the 205#gti - should have been a factory job.
Would have given them 160bhp in a 900kg car in 1991. smile
With thousands of warranty repairs for oil surge issues.

This is what I was told when speaking to someone who used to be high up in Peugeot in the early 90s. They reckoned the engine was OK for the 405 as it was bigger and couldn't corner as fast as a 205. They said that for the angle it would have to be installed in a 205 it would run the risk of oil surge issues. Having seen that exact thing happen to Mi16 engined 205s on at least 4 separate occasions, I would say that was the right choice.
They decided (Peugeot UK) to stay with the Turbo Technics conversion for people who wanted more power.

louismchuge

1,628 posts

190 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
been day dreaming of a merc w115 with a 190e cosworth engine in...

richw_82

992 posts

192 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
Perhaps a car that WAS built but which disappeared was the Lotus type 47 Europa built for GKN in 1969. Instead of the usual engine it was fitted with a Rover 3.5 litre V8. It was registered GKN 47 D and I wonder if it still exists? It sure must have beena fun car! I have a photo of it here.
OOhh... now there's a car I'd dearly love that I'd forgotten about!

Last I heard of it it was in the USA, though I know several conversions have been done to Rover power. I know there was one car inspired by this that had a GT40 engine and gearbox combination.

72twink

963 posts

248 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
It was registered GKN 47 D and I wonder if it still exists?
Very much so ........

Last Entry


lowdrag

13,025 posts

219 months

Monday 14th December 2009
quotequote all
Thanks for that 72twink. I see you are quite a Lotus fan yourself! I'd done a DVLA search but as it is in the USA no wonder it doesn't show. Thanks for sharing the info anyway.