Classic car adverts

[SpeedyGonzales]

Hello all,

Recently, i have had this large interest in classic car adverts from the 1980s.

Below are a few examples, you can see how much they have changed over the years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qB0lb401ZU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2NV1DfIme4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WlU9QBDkUE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKNzu6pLfIM&fea...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z60csC3JCkc

Thanks

Big Chris

[wedgie]

The sad thing is, American commercials are still as crap

[Balmoral Green]

[Pedant mode]But they're not classic car adverts, the cars were brand new.[/Pedant mode]

[Prof Beard]

Balmoral Green][Pedant mode said:

But they're not classic car adverts, the cars were brand new.[/Pedant mode]

Insufficiently pedantic Warren - criticism should be for ambiguity. Even if the adverts are classic, the cars may not be AND there are lots of adverts for classic cars in the PH classifieds.

So does the OP mean "classic adverts for cars", "adverts for classic cars", "old adverts for cars which are now regarded as classic cars", or "classic adverts for cars which are now regarded as classic cars"?

[SpeedyGonzales]

Prof Beard said:

Balmoral Green][Pedant mode said:

But they're not classic car adverts, the cars were brand new.[/Pedant mode]

Insufficiently pedantic Warren - criticism should be for ambiguity. Even if the adverts are classic, the cars may not be AND there are lots of adverts for classic cars in the PH classifieds.

So does the OP mean "classic adverts for cars", "adverts for classic cars", "old adverts for cars which are now regarded as classic cars", or "classic adverts for cars which are now regarded as classic cars"?

Well, if you want to have the "Correct" title it would be, "Old adverts for cars which are now regarded as Classic Cars".

[Bomber Denton]

I always liked this one.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NEFPldXp_u4