Opinions about classic cars

Author
Discussion

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,123 posts

264 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Every one has 'em. Some stereotypes aren't THAT true though.

Let me hear your opinions about:






What exactly do YOU think is so special about a Bugatti T37?

Pics by DutchBert.

Edited by dinkel on Wednesday 3rd October 09:02

dc53

3,217 posts

226 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
The grille and over sized head lights do it for me, looks terrific.

Heebeegeetee

28,955 posts

254 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
I guess its related to the T35, which as everybody knows was the worlds first supercar. A grand prix car that you genuinely could drive on the road.

Bugattis are wonderful...

alsaautomotive

684 posts

206 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
Properly engineered motor carscool

Rum Runner

2,338 posts

223 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2007
quotequote all
I think there was quite a artistic talent in that family, it shows through all there work .A eye for detail

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,123 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
Heebeegeetee said:
. . . the worlds first supercar. A grand prix car that you genuinely could drive on the road.
True, and that appeals right?

But what makes 'em stand out from period racers? Is it the magic of the brand?

Rob Mk2a

30 posts

235 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
i'm no expert but I think the photo is of a Type 35(c?) not a Type 37 which is a 4 cylinder.

Come to VSCC Prescott and you'll see the appeal.

Rob

zaktoo

805 posts

213 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
It's the happy collision of art & engineering. Beautiful details, no-expense-spared engineering.

900T-R

20,405 posts

263 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
Light, focused, and exquisitely engineered to the point where the line between engineering and art (if there's such a thing) is transgressed. In other words; everything a Veyron is not.

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,123 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
Rob Mk2a said:
i'm no expert but I think the photo is of a Type 35(c?) not a Type 37 which is a 4 cylinder.
yes Sorry for that, I'm no expert either wink

900T-R said:
Light, focused, and exquisitely engineered to the point where the line between engineering and art (if there's such a thing) is transgressed. In other words; everything a Veyron is not.
True, well spoken. Even the Royale looks 'light', thanx through the beuatifull balanced design and engineering.

Next:


Morgans, why are they so damn popular?


They drive like a dream - more hard edge than you'd expect - and the cars (+4 and 8) didn't change that much the last zillion years. But there are so much (Brit) roadsters to choose from. Why Mogs?

Heebeegeetee

28,955 posts

254 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
dinkel]5.jpg[/pic said:
They drive like a dream - more hard edge than you'd expect - and the cars (+4 and 8) didn't change that much the last zillion years. But there are so much (Brit) roadsters to choose from. Why Mogs?
Er, sorry to say this, but i once spent a day in the passenger seat of a Plus 4, marshalling on a car trial, and the |Morgan was awful. Indescribably awful. My MGB was 22 years older than that Morgan and was miles better. The Morgan was so bad that we couldn't travel at any speed at all along the derbyshire lanes. Its quality was dire, its ergonomics, the postion of gear lever and steering wheel and minor controls were awful. It was simply the worst car i have ever been in.

fourwheelsteer

869 posts

258 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
I think Morgans are so popular because there is nothing else quite like them. New ones aren't that expensive especially when you consider you're getting something made by hand to your order. I don't know how a Morgan drives but I would expect it to be rough, bumpy and thoroughly unpleasant. A Morgan fan probably regards that as part of the character.

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,123 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
fourwheelsteer said:
. . . how a Morgan drives but I would expect it to be rough, bumpy and thoroughly unpleasant. A Morgan fan probably regards that as part of the character.
scratchchin

Doesn't a TR3/4/5/6, MGA, Sprite, Healey etc do so?

M3John

5,974 posts

225 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
dinkel said:

What exactly do YOU think is so special about a Bugatti T37?

Not to sure to be honest mate, i don't think that it could be any one thing. The package as a whole is just lick

SpeedyGonzales

7,211 posts

210 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
I really love classic cars, its proper manuel work with not too much technolgoy included.

Forthright MC

8,362 posts

289 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
SpeedyGonzales said:
I really love classic cars, its proper manuel work with not too much technolgoy included.
wot e sed! yes

classic cars have such a unique charm and personality about them

Morgan's for me are one of the archetypal british sports cars, love the wonderful rolling lines and the bespokeness of the way they are constructed particularly and they have kept to it even after all these years!
even the Aero 8 which has modern technology engine/build wise has the classic stance/cues too IMO

dinkel

Original Poster:

27,123 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
They really are. But Healey's and TR6's are archetypical too aren't they?

M3John said:
dinkel said:

What exactly do YOU think is so special about a Bugatti T37?
Not to sure to be honest mate, i don't think that it could be any one thing. The package as a whole is just lick
Let's debate about that saturday John beer There are quite a few glorious racers of that period worthy of some fame too.


Let's move on to Italia. One of my fav roadsters is this P'Farina Spider. The Italians made such stylish small cars like this one and the Alfa Spider / Duetto. Another league compared to the period TR 6's and MGB's.





I can't understand why MGB's are that more popular. The Yanks had a soft spot for these Italian 2 litres and today fine rustfree examples come from California . . . Tempting.

tr3a

563 posts

233 months

Wednesday 3rd October 2007
quotequote all
Any true Bugatti is a piece of art. If you ever heard a blown straight eight Bugatti engine pass you at full song, you'll remember it for the rest of your life. There are very few cars of that period that are comparable to Bugattis, the way they were designed and constructed, the history of the marque. That's the true magic of Bugatti for me. That's why I loathe the way the name Bugatti is used today, on modern cars. It's like a living painter who buys the name Rembrandt, sticks it on his paintings and charges a premium for them.

As to Italian cars, I think they try too hard, especially when it comes to outward appearances. That's probably also the reason too many shallow people seem to be attracted to them.

There, I've said it. Donning my Nomex undies now - flame away! wink

M3John

5,974 posts

225 months

Thursday 4th October 2007
quotequote all
dinkel said:



I can't understand why MGB's are that more popular. The Yanks had a soft spot for these Italian 2 litres and today fine rustfree examples come from California . . . Tempting.
Yep i'm with you on that one mate !

lowdrag

13,025 posts

219 months

Thursday 4th October 2007
quotequote all
Bugattis - a visit to Prescott or the Schlumpf musuem say it all. But for me the moment when I truly fell in love was when, at Goodwood, I saw someone dismantling the head and overhead cam system. Those delightful bearings were just divine............

At Watkins Glen this year Bugatti were the feted marque - here's a couple of shots of the parade on the old circuit on which Main St. was the pit straight at the time. Sorry about the photo quality - I haven't had time to PP them properly and just pressed auto.






Edited by lowdrag on Thursday 4th October 09:35