Escort for the purists

Author
Discussion

gt40steve

Original Poster:

884 posts

111 months

Monday 29th January
quotequote all
https://www.mathewsons.co.uk/auction/lot/lot-237--...

V5 says RS2000, chassis plate says Halewood built 1300.

Car speaks for itself.

SS427 Camaro

6,504 posts

177 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all


Stunner !! Could eat your dinner off of it. To me this RS2 is like stepping back in time to the 1978 Custom Car Magazine show @ Ally Pally.
Strange choice of colour will hold its value back, plus is it or isn’t it a genuine RS2.

Mark A S

1,902 posts

195 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
VERY nice car, awful colour combo, RS2 log book on a donor shell, nowt wrong with that so long as its made clear.
So, remove front spoiler and spots, re spray etc,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

SS2.

14,519 posts

245 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
If I was to consider owning another RS Escort from the 1970's, I'd want one with a genuine Type 49 shell.

Appreciate there'd be a considerable uplift in price, but it would irk me knowing it was a non-RS re-shell.

blueg33

38,567 posts

231 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
Thread fails to deliver on title...................... wink

reddiesel

2,477 posts

54 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
blueg33 said:
Thread fails to deliver on title...................... wink
I must admit to agreeing with you

gt40steve

Original Poster:

884 posts

111 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
reddiesel said:
blueg33 said:
Thread fails to deliver on title...................... wink
I must admit to agreeing with you
Yes, sarcastic perhaps.......

aeropilot

36,594 posts

234 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
Mark A S said:
VERY nice car, awful colour combo, RS2 log book on a donor shell, nowt wrong with that so long as its made clear.
Which chassis number is on the V5 though...?

If its the one on the black/silver VIN plate under the bonnet, then the V5 is incorrect in saying its a RS2000......(but that's DVLA's error)

If the logbook is from a real RS2000, and has a BFAT chassis number, then the donor shell BBAT chassis plate should be removed as there is a conflict in VIN between V5 and what is on the car......which I believe is not legal...?

Edited by aeropilot on Tuesday 30th January 11:40

aeropilot

36,594 posts

234 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
Oh, and its very, err pink biggrin



Gixer968CS

703 posts

95 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
It isn't a Type 49 shell (no bolts across the boot floor etc). Has a BB chassis number and all RS2000s were BFAT. Non standard colour. Non standard seats etc etc. Not an RS2000.

zeb

3,235 posts

225 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
And priced to reflect that perhaps? Clearly not an RS2

Skyedriver

18,906 posts

289 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
Ad says Type 49 shell
So someone is maybe telling little fibs?
Don't like the colour either. Needs to be white or Valencia(?) blue

Mr Tidy

24,337 posts

134 months

Tuesday 30th January
quotequote all
TBH I think that's an Escort not for the purists!

And the colour scheme doesn't help.

Legacywr

12,799 posts

195 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
I expect it looks good trucking down the road, though.

bad company

19,479 posts

273 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
I saw the post name and thought of a different kind of escort!!! laughlaughlaugh

getmecoat

blueg33

38,567 posts

231 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
bad company said:
I saw the post name and thought of a different kind of escort!!! laughlaughlaugh

getmecoat
That was my point up the thread. I was possibly too subtle.

gt40steve

Original Poster:

884 posts

111 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
TBH I think that's an Escort not for the purists!

And the colour scheme doesn't help.
Yes, sarcastic perhaps.......

aeropilot

36,594 posts

234 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
Skyedriver said:
Ad says Type 49 shell
So someone is maybe telling little fibs?
Describing it as a RS2000 is one for a start!

Normally, from the TV series they are pretty careful when describing cars that have had a reshell as being an evocation etc., which they did for that bubble arch Twin Cam (which was a re-shell of a genuine car) as well as that Lotus-Cortina, which again, I've heard was a period re-shell of a genuine car, and thus perhaps over cautious from a legal pov.
And yet, here they are doing the opposite to a car that is so clearly not what they are calling it....maybe because this one isn't on the TV show, so no need for the legal caution? scratchchin

TBH, if it wasn't for the silver RS style stripe kit applied it wouldn't look a bad car, and if the shell is OK etc., 15-20k is its likely price.
It identity though is questionable, especially with that fake, restamped Ford VIN plate.

Richard-390a0

2,576 posts

98 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
Del Boy by name & Del Boy by nature! You'd think Mathewsons would be a bit more careful in their descriptions now they're more in the public eye due to the TV series?. Old Derek needs to learn to say no sometimes or maybe employ someone to list stuff correctly?.

sixor8

6,610 posts

275 months

Wednesday 31st January
quotequote all
All auction houses put out disclaimers. It's a bit like market hall rules, caveat emptor and all that.

Only if the description is blatantly wrong would you have grounds to not complete the purchase. I saw this at CCA once, the auction description and photos of a Ford Sierra had made no mention of the galloping rust on the wheel arches, not even putting the catch-all 'requires cosmetic attention.' rolleyes The car got entered in the next auction with more accuracy, this was all in 2020 when there was not attendance possible.

This is theirs:

"Photographs are helpful but often not accurate. Videos are informative but are opinions only. No amount of images will ever replace the benefits of pre-auction viewing. Buyers are invited and encouraged to inspect prior to bidding."

Also from T+C

Any motor vehicle is sold as a collector’s item and not as a means of transport. Buyers are
specifically warned that any vehicle sold as such may well have had parts replaced and paint
renewed or be made up of parts from other vehicles the condition of which may be difficult to
establish. The Auctioneer has to rely on information as to the date, condition and authenticity
provided by the Seller and does not provide its own description, and does not and cannot
undertake its own inspection of vehicles or other Lot and it is the responsibility of the Buyer
to ensure that the Lot conforms to the description in the catalogue. The Auctioneer cannot
check or verify the authenticity of the chassis or VIN number under which a vehicle is offered,
but relies on the Seller’s description.

eek

Edited by sixor8 on Wednesday 31st January 11:24