Stunning E Type Series 1

Author
Discussion

cayman-black

Original Poster:

12,812 posts

221 months

aeropilot

36,100 posts

232 months

Wednesday 26th July 2023
quotequote all
Shame it's been ruined by an exterior and interior colour change during it's 'restoration'.


Miserablegit

4,127 posts

114 months

Wednesday 26th July 2023
quotequote all
Not sure a colour change equates to it being ruined…

rallycross

13,165 posts

242 months

Wednesday 26th July 2023
quotequote all
I’d guess it drives like an old cart horse with a nice new interior.

ettore

4,284 posts

257 months

Wednesday 26th July 2023
quotequote all
Miserablegit said:
Not sure a colour change equates to it being ruined…
Ditto… this is a recent concern, never considered it a massive issue.

Harry Rule

185 posts

46 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
ettore said:
Miserablegit said:
Not sure a colour change equates to it being ruined…
Ditto… this is a recent concern, never considered it a massive issue.
I'm with Aeropilot.

If I was in the market for a fully restored E Type, this just wouldn't interest me unless I could get it at a price that would allow me to factor in a full repaint and retrim back to it's original colour scheme.


CanAm

9,779 posts

277 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
Cost £166,000 plus value of original car in 2022 and sold for £107,500 (less fees I assume) so maybe using a RR paint colour rather than a Jaguar one wasn't such a good idea.

lowdrag

13,008 posts

218 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
Back in the day we painted any colour we chose. Here was mine in 1987, looking resplendent in Ford Glacier Blue.



During the boom of 1991 virtually every car was painted Carmen Red because that was the colour that sold cars. Since the turn of this century attitudes have changed and "matching numbers" and original colour schemes have become important. I loved my car in blue but after thirty hard years a rebuild was needed so - and sorrowfully for me - she went back to Gunmetal Grey and red interior, her original factory colours. I still prefer the blue though.



When I bought it the car had been hand-painted in yellow, but before that had been maroon having started life in Gunmetal and latterly blue. In a similar way the model to own in 1991 was a V12, then the S1 4.2 was considered the car to have, but it seem nowadays that the earliest cars are the most value and the V12 is sinking without trace. I saw a primrose1968 coupé in immaculate condition sell for £37,000 not long ago. But this car in question was done to the owner's choice and taste and fair play to him, even if the dashboard and tunnel are redone in alloy, which was only current up to late 1963 and the gear lever knob is from a Moss box and not a Jaguar synchro one. The bonnet louvres are all wrong too, being of 1961 style. He's lost a lot of money (maybe that's his house in the background) but then probably he had the money to lose. You won't see another like it, that's for sure. It should be a wonderful car to own and drive though.

Edited by lowdrag on Thursday 27th July 05:58

GoodOlBoy

569 posts

108 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
One doesn't really have to ponder.

But if it's playing on your mind I have it on good authority that they had their bank account closed.

bumskins

1,766 posts

20 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
Shame it's been ruined by an exterior and interior colour change during it's 'restoration'.
I've always hated Golden Sand as a colour (or JRG as it was affectionately known) so imo the car was 'ruined' during the specification and build phase back in 1965 paperbag

Purosangue

1,118 posts

18 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
cayman-black said:
Its not a fully matching numbers car ?

wrong paint colour , not even a period colour !! , and early metal dash board , and incorrect interior colour ..............really a bit of a "bitsa" ,

The original colour and interior would have been perfect

Opalescent Golden Sand with Light Tan hide.

Miserablegit

4,127 posts

114 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
When I paid for a nut and bolt restoration I knew I would never get my money back - I had the car finished in a period correct colour but it was a colour from a different manufacturer. The restoration was for my benefit and sod anybody else - I guess this owner might have felt the same. I never intend to sell my car so I’ll never “realise” the loss.
I’d much rather see classics fully restored in “incorrect” colours rather than have them sitting as spares donors.




Edit typo

cayman-black

Original Poster:

12,812 posts

221 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
This car has me looking at E types I personally love the colour scheme on this car and is one of the best I have seen advertised I think the price it sold for is a great buy as others are around £130-£150. Congratulations SirGD.
I wouldn't look at it if it was in the original colour how important are matching numbers I really do not know but let's say if it had matching numbers it would be £150k?
I have never driven one so I cannot comment on this but I have seen one advertised where the owner kept the car in a glass box in his office and for me, I would hardly drive it anyway its a thing of beauty to be admired.

Is this the price that people are willing to pay for these now though and the others are just dealers asking too much?
Car and classics site is free to buyers as well so that was the end price.

And finally for those in the know who are respected E-type specialists?

swisstoni

17,803 posts

284 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
I actually really like the colour this was originally.

I was moved to take a few snaps of one at a car show a few years ago as I was so taken with it;




aeropilot

36,100 posts

232 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
But this car in question was done to the owner's choice and taste and fair play to him, even if the dashboard and tunnel are redone in alloy, which was only current up to late 1963 and the gear lever knob is from a Moss box and not a Jaguar synchro one. The bonnet louvres are all wrong too, being of 1961 style. He's lost a lot of money (maybe that's his house in the background) but then probably he had the money to lose.
So, likely, he wanted the 'look' of an early S1 car.......but given the money he spent on the restoration (plus what ever he paid for the donor car) at the time it was done, how much more would a real early S1 have cost to get the look he wanted....given he'd have been looking for a rough early S1 car to start with?

All seems a bit odd, and judging by the non-existent wear and condition, it doesn't look like its been driven much since finished either.

And for me, Golden Sand with London Tan or Red interior is a lovely colour combo on an E (or a Mk2 or S-Type)



TheLoraxxZeus

379 posts

24 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
Period correctness aside this isn't an ugly car. The paint is fine and the interior is fine. If you want period correct that's fine but saying the decisions have "ruined" the car is a bit unfair. The car will still feel the same to drive in and the experience will still be unique.

lowdrag

13,008 posts

218 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
cayman-black said:
Is this the price that people are willing to pay for these now though and the others are just dealers asking too much?
Car and classics site is free to buyers as well so that was the end price.

And finally for those in the know who are respected E-type specialists?
Oh, believe me there are E-type specialists on every corner in the world. Well, they say they are anyway. Did the seller ask for the changes to make the car look like an early car, including modifications that makes the car 1963, 1961 and 1962 depending where you look, or did the restorer do that completely on his own? As regards prices, my recent records show a 1966 coupé selling this year between ££60,000 to as high as $118,000. As I've said before, if you go back to a very early car prices are very different, with one coupé in the USA selling for $600,000 a few months back and a car owned by a friend receiving and offer of £750,000 Both of these are in the first 500 E-types made.

lowdrag

13,008 posts

218 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
I forgot.to mention that this is Golden Sand


aeropilot

36,100 posts

232 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
TheLoraxxZeus said:
Period correctness aside this isn't an ugly car. The paint is fine and the interior is fine. If you want period correct that's fine
And no doubt the person that has bought it at the money they have has got a relative bargain, if how it is is what floats their boat.
I've got no problem with someone buying a 'customised' E if it floats their boat.....but, as much as I love personalised 'hot rods'.....I'd want a car like this in its factory colours and close to spec as possible. I'm not an expert on E's but Lowdrag pointing out all the other changes made it even worse for me than just it just being a colour and trim change!

I'm not in the market for an E anyway, so its all rather inconsequential in the scheme of things.




Longnose

250 posts

118 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
Anorak time... The spoke pattern of the wheels is wrong for an S1. The inner layer of spokes should cross over each other 3 times, not 2. They're angled more which presumably gives more strength for acceleration and braking. Here's a picture of an unrestored S1 showing the correct pattern.