Triumph Herald convertible
Discussion
Beforehand, I might have quietly sniggered at one of these. But I drove one recently and thought it was really cool.
Obviously you don't turn corners fast and the acceleration from the 1100cc engine is quite unlike anything from any modern car, but with the roof down it feels so different to todays cars; makes an SLK or 3-series cabriolet seem like a disgustingly tasteless, unoriginal and uninspiring way of going topless! Also the ride was pretty good and the engine amazingly smooth and quiet. I guess that's what you get with simplicity.
Or maybe it's just so old that it's cool now?
Russell
Obviously you don't turn corners fast and the acceleration from the 1100cc engine is quite unlike anything from any modern car, but with the roof down it feels so different to todays cars; makes an SLK or 3-series cabriolet seem like a disgustingly tasteless, unoriginal and uninspiring way of going topless! Also the ride was pretty good and the engine amazingly smooth and quiet. I guess that's what you get with simplicity.
Or maybe it's just so old that it's cool now?
Russell
I had a Mk1 Vitesse 2.0 convertible as my only wheels for a few years. It wasn't a particularly sound example, but it was fun to drive if you didn't try to pretend it was fast.
Great value classic if you can keep on top of the rust issues - Heralds are just that little bit too slow though, in my opinion.
Great value classic if you can keep on top of the rust issues - Heralds are just that little bit too slow though, in my opinion.
Gassing Station | Classic Cars and Yesterday's Heroes | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff