Mercedes 280sl ideal fuel
Author
Discussion

sean280sl

Original Poster:

1 posts

173 months

Sunday 22nd April 2012
quotequote all
hi, i have a 1984 Mercedes 280sl does it need to have an unleaded conversion? thanks

Doofus

34,279 posts

202 months

Sunday 22nd April 2012
quotequote all
No

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Sunday 22nd April 2012
quotequote all
Doofus said:
No
To expand a little...

The easy way of telling whether any work is needed is to see whether the car was sold in the USA after 1970, because that's when unleaded fuel was introduced there. So assuming we're not talking about a W113 280SL (Pagoda), there should be no problem.

bmwcsl

259 posts

256 months

Monday 23rd April 2012
quotequote all
Most premium cars used hardened valve seats anyway before unleaded becamse an issue - i have the same car as you and it has been running on unleaded for the last 80k miles and so far no discernable priblems although it does run much better on avgas!

lowdrag

13,181 posts

242 months

Monday 23rd April 2012
quotequote all
Another guide is surely if the engine has an alloy head. E-types were sold unmodified in California post the introduction of unleaded only in 1964 because they already had hardened seats. Does the SL have an alloy head? Not sure myself, not being a Merc person.

GadgeS3C

4,727 posts

193 months

Monday 23rd April 2012
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
Another guide is surely if the engine has an alloy head. E-types were sold unmodified in California post the introduction of unleaded only in 1964 because they already had hardened seats. Does the SL have an alloy head? Not sure myself, not being a Merc person.
Lots of British motorbikes have alloy heads but still allegedly need different, hardened inserts for unleaded. So not sure if that is a good guide.

I may, of course, be talking twaddle!

Doofus

34,279 posts

202 months

Monday 23rd April 2012
quotequote all
All of which is very informative, I'm sure. However, it muddies the water a bit.

The answer to the OP's question is no. Not 'maybe not', or 'it depends', just 'no'.


smile

GadgeS3C

4,727 posts

193 months

Monday 23rd April 2012
quotequote all
Doofus said:
All of which is very informative, I'm sure. However, it muddies the water a bit.

The answer to the OP's question is no. Not 'maybe not', or 'it depends', just 'no'.


smile
Pistonheads - obfuscation rules - we fear clarity wink

A9XXC

621 posts

178 months

Monday 23rd April 2012
quotequote all
Please define - Clarity....