lotus names

Author
Discussion

fordowner

Original Poster:

1 posts

218 months

Saturday 23rd September 2006
quotequote all
why do all lotus' models begin with an " E "

Sam_68

9,939 posts

252 months

Saturday 23rd September 2006
quotequote all
Because Colin Chapman decided that words begining with 'E' flowed well from the name 'Lotus'. Don't know what the correct terminology is; assonance, perhaps?

Started with 'Eleven' (up to and including then, models had been identified by type numbers and continued to be so for the racing cars).

From the Eleven:
Elite
Elan
Europa
Elite (again)
Esprit
Eclat
Etna
Excel
Elan (again)
Elise
Exige
Europa (again).

There have been three exceptions to the rule, that I can remember: the Seven (which actually came after the Eleven, but since it was manufactured by Lotus Components rather than Lotus Cars might be thought of as falling into the numerical type numbering of the racing cars), the Plus 2 (officially Lotus dropped the 'Elan' prefix for later 2+2 models) and the 340R.

The Elise narrowly avoided being called the One Eleven, after its internal project number.



Edited by Sam_68 on Saturday 23 September 22:40

monkey boy 1

2,063 posts

238 months

Sunday 24th September 2006
quotequote all
All looks correct to me, I think the Etna was a still born project, similar to the M250.

Also there was the Expose, a one-off "see through" 340R which was used in hill climb events by Lotus Engineer Tony Shute

doogalman

734 posts

252 months

Monday 25th September 2006
quotequote all
What about the 340R?????

135sport

442 posts

287 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all

I thought the official name for 340r was 'Elise 340r'.

And I thought the seven was only referred to as 7 (in number form, not written).

I thought the E sequence started with the Eleven because was it not the first road going model offered by Lotus as a fully built car, everyhting before it being a kit form. You could purchase an 11 for racing and an Eleven for the road.

(many thoughts there......I do hope some are correct!)

Blipi

2,355 posts

244 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
There was also the one-off M200 built after the M100 Elan.

That did the Shelsey Walsh hill climb a couple of years back and was sold earlier this year at the Donington Lotus Show.

Sam_68

9,939 posts

252 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
doogalman said:
What about the 340R?????


like I said:
There have been three exceptions to the rule, that I can remember: the Seven (which actually came after the Eleven, but since it was manufactured by Lotus Components rather than Lotus Cars might be thought of as falling into the numerical type numbering of the racing cars), the Plus 2 (officially Lotus dropped the 'Elan' prefix for later 2+2 models) and the 340R.


Perhaps the Lotus Sport division, which developed the 340R, is seen as the successor to Lotus Components/Team Lotus, in which case they would normally use type numbers? 340 isn't a sequential Lotus Project number, AFAIK, however - it was intended to refer to the car's power:weight ratio, until they discovered they couldn't build it light enough.

The 'E'-naming policy isn't set in stone, anyway - it's not as if it's wirtten into the company's constitution or anything, just a loose tradition. Like I also said earlier, the Elise was nearly the 'One-Eleven' until Romano Artioli decided to name it after his grand daughter.

Edited by Sam_68 on Tuesday 26th September 12:36

monkey boy 1

2,063 posts

238 months

Tuesday 26th September 2006
quotequote all
Sam_68 said:
doogalman said:
What about the 340R?????


like I said:
There have been three exceptions to the rule, that I can remember: the Seven (which actually came after the Eleven, but since it was manufactured by Lotus Components rather than Lotus Cars might be thought of as falling into the numerical type numbering of the racing cars), the Plus 2 (officially Lotus dropped the 'Elan' prefix for later 2+2 models) and the 340R.


Perhaps the Lotus Sport division, which developed the 340R, is seen as the successor to Lotus Components/Team Lotus, in which case they would normally use type numbers? 340 isn't a sequential Lotus Project number, AFAIK, however - it was intended to refer to the car's power:weight ratio, until they discovered they couldn't build it light enough.

The 'E'-naming policy isn't set in stone, anyway - it's not as if it's wirtten into the company's constitution or anything, just a loose tradition. Like I also said earlier, the Elise was nearly the 'One-Eleven' until Romano Artioli decided to name it after his grand daughter.

Edited by Sam_68 on Tuesday 26th September 12:36


The Elise was also referred as the "step-in" as it's original concept was not to have doors. But for practicality they designed in doors at a later stage, and at a compromise from the original design, as talked about on the "Elise story" programme that was on Sky a few years back. probably on DVD too

ELAN+2

2,232 posts

239 months

Monday 2nd October 2006
quotequote all
the Eclat XL was supposed to be the first break away from the 'E' name issue (running out of words that could be used), the marketing guys soon called it the Excel!! so back to the drawing board! I got this from a book BTW

Mark

DBSV8

5,958 posts

245 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all


not forgetting the type 20 /22

thumbup

anonymous-user

61 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
I'm a long-time Lotus owner and fan. However, following recent further postponement of the Esprit replacement and in order to keep the traditional nomenclature going I suggest the name,

Lotus Excuse.

Sam_68

9,939 posts

252 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
DBSV8 said:
not forgetting the type 20 /22

like I said:
Started with 'Eleven' (up to and including then, models had been identified by type numbers and continued to be so for the racing cars).


Pay attention at the back!!

Sam_68

9,939 posts

252 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
5 USA said:
I'm a long-time Lotus owner and fan. However, following recent further postponement of the Esprit replacement and in order to keep the traditional nomenclature going I suggest the name,

Lotus Excuse.


...or perhaps the Lotus Eventually?

monkey boy 1

2,063 posts

238 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
we had a conversation at work a few years ago on a similar line, if i can remember, I think we came up with :

Lotus Entrail
Lotus Explosive
Lotus Explosion
Lotus Erratic
Lotus Expensive
Lotus Elsie (after Artioli came up with Elise after his Granddaughter)
Lotus Eric
Lotus Expire
Lotus Expletive
Lotus Expatriate (if it were to move production abroad)
Lotus End

We probably had some more, but I can't think of them at the moment.

DBSV8

5,958 posts

245 months

Wednesday 18th October 2006
quotequote all
Sam_68 said:
DBSV8 said:
not forgetting the type 20 /22

like I said:
Started with 'Eleven' (up to and including then, models had been identified by type numbers and continued to be so for the racing cars).


Pay attention at the back!!


Who mentioned racing cars !!! hehe

try type 20/22 road car

biglaugh

Sam_68

9,939 posts

252 months

Wednesday 18th October 2006
quotequote all
DBSV8 said:
Who mentioned racing cars !!!


Erm....you did. Your profile describes it as a road registered racing car, does it not?! rofl

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it left the factory with lights, mudguards and a Kawasaki bike engine, either, did it?

DBSV8

5,958 posts

245 months

Wednesday 18th October 2006
quotequote all
Sam_68 said:
DBSV8 said:
Who mentioned racing cars !!!


Erm....you did. Your profile describes it as a road registered racing car, does it not?! rofl

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it left the factory with lights, mudguards and a Kawasaki bike engine, either, did it?


kinda heinz variety lotus

ndixon

30 posts

287 months

Wednesday 8th November 2006
quotequote all
+
Lotus Eminence

run a search

N

acampbell

4 posts

233 months

Thursday 9th November 2006
quotequote all
Maybe the Lotus Seven had a slient 'S' -> Lotus 'even

Disco_Dale

1,893 posts

217 months

Friday 10th November 2006
quotequote all
Lotus type numbers:
www.race-cars.com/utility/lotusr.htm

Interesting that the Talbot Sunbeam Lotus shares a type number with an F1 car.