RE: Lotus heads for GT racing

RE: Lotus heads for GT racing

Monday 19th December 2005

Lotus heads for GT racing

New Exige GT3 hits the track


Lotus heads for GT racing
Lotus heads for GT racing
Lotus has joined the growing ranks of those manufacturers supporting the 2006 FIA GT3 series. A prototype of the Lotus Sport Exige GT3 race car was unveiled at the annual FIA GT Championship presentation ceremony outside the world famous Monte Carlo Casino recently. The following day the Exige-derived car was tested for the first time at the high speed Paul Ricard test track in southern France under FIA supervision.

This is the first stage in the Lotus Sport-developed Exige GT3 becoming eligible for FIA GT3 competition. This latest FIA series, which will start in 2006, is for race cars that have an equal power to weight, and that have a direct lineage to their road-going versions.

Sticking to the Lotus philosophy of performance through lightness, it weighs about 750Kg. The car uses a race prepared 1.8 2ZZ-GE VVTL-i engine with a Roots type supercharger and air to air intercooler which utilises the Lotus T4e Engine Control Unit to produce 285bhp at 7,800rpm, providing an impressive power to weight ratio of 380bhp per tonne.

Following a brief shakedown programme at the Lotus Test Track at Hethel, factory test driver Gavan Kershaw carried out final chassis setup work on wet tyres in the morning session at the Paul Ricard test. This was followed by an outing on slick tyres on a drying track by FIA-nominated test driver Christophe Bouchut.

Commenting on the encouraging test session, Chris Arnold, General Manager of Lotus Sport, said: "We were delighted to attend the official FIA test session. Considering the car was still on the drawing board two months ago it's a fantastic achievement by the team to complete the build in such a short time. We knew this test would be a first shakedown for the car on slicks and I'm very pleased with the results. Our winter development programme starts with a wind tunnel test just before Christmas followed by further work in preparation for the next FIA test in March."

The FIA has announced a five race European championship for the new GT3 class with rounds in the UK, Germany, Belgium, France and Italy. Various national GT Championships are also considering amending their regulations to include a GT3 class. 

Basic prototype specification

Like the standard Exige, the Lotus Sport Exige GT3 comes complete with the award-winning light weight bonded aluminium chassis. This is complemented by low weight five-spoke forged alloy wheels, carbon body panels, and a revised high downforce aerodynamic package incorporating a race front splitter and adjustable carbon fibre rear wing.

An FIA 6-point roll cage, ignition kill switches, and uprated braking and suspension systems including Öhlins 3-way adjustable dampers also feature on the new race car. A 6-speed sequential transmission system, and full data logging system have been fitted to the single-seater prototype vehicle.  

Availability, full specification, and price of the Lotus Sport Exige GT3 will be announced in early 2006. 

Author
Discussion

GTRene

Original Poster:

17,497 posts

230 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
I say a big welkom to the Lotus Sport Exige GT3 looks are good and weight too! hope they get it all very competing...like that "little" thing on the road too with that 285hp, but maybe a year waiting and it will be an option too...
But the aftermarket catch up and also dilivers those outputs with Twin Screw chargers, nice cars these kind of lotus's?.
GTRene

matrs

451 posts

289 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
Like the Speedline wheels.

Awsome bit of kit

BazC

317 posts

252 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
About bloody time !!

toys

242 posts

265 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
If Lotus can make a race Exige (based on the standard aluminium chassis) with full rollcage, extinguishers etc weigh 750 kg, then why is the road version nearly 1000 kg??

Nuvo

13 posts

226 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
But the Exige is too slow, the Paul Ricard times:

Aston Martin DBR9 2:14.669

Dodge Viper 2:14.938

Porsche 997 2:15.765

Maserati Gran Sport 2:18.252

Lamborghini Gallardo 2:18.316

Ascari KZ01 2:19.804

Nissan 350Z 2:21.172

Lotus Exige 2:25.513

I guess they may change that engine if they want to do something.

M100

84 posts

267 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
"Availability, full specification, and price of the Lotus Sport Exige GT3 will be announced in early 2006."

Most of it is already out in the open in a FIA GT3 Press Release

www.fiagt.com/system/_download.php?filename=press_kit_monacov8.pdf


Andrew D

968 posts

246 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
Nuvo said:
But the Exige is too slow, the Paul Ricard times


Surely most of those cars are not GT3?

Power-to-weight classification sounds like a good idea, provided that the tracks used in the championship aren't just long and straight. Should make for an interesting series.

havoc

30,700 posts

241 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
toys said:
If Lotus can make a race Exige (based on the standard aluminium chassis) with full rollcage, extinguishers etc weigh 750 kg, then why is the road version nearly 1000 kg??

I suspect there MAY be some carbonfibre used...
;o)

Of course, feel free to specify this option for your road-car, but have your chequebook ready.

Tuna

19,930 posts

290 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
Nuvo said:
But the Exige is too slow, the Paul Ricard times:

Nissan 350Z 2:21.172

Lotus Exige 2:25.513

I guess they may change that engine if they want to do something.


Those are road car times, as far as I can work out. From a quick google, the Nissan power to weight ratio is something like 0.19 bhp / kg. The Exige GT3 is 0.38 bhp / kg - in other words TWICE the power of the Nissan. If Paul Ricard gets some times for it, expect some improvement over a stock (series 1?) Exige.

It's interesting to note that a humble 1.8 litre engine is powerful enough to fit the GT series if it's in the right car. No need to go to big bore and lots of cylinders if you get the basic configuration right.

GrahamG

1,091 posts

273 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
They were all GT3 spec race cars - the test session was done to establish what needs to be achieved to equalise performance

Tuna

19,930 posts

290 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
GrahamG said:
They were all GT3 spec race cars - the test session was done to establish what needs to be achieved to equalise performance


That's weird then - so they all had the same power to weight, yet a good ten seconds difference in lap times? Lotus' legendary handling seems to be underperforming if that's the case. Even more worrying if a Lotus is being out handled by a Dodge Viper with the same power to weight..

>> Edited by Tuna on Monday 19th December 16:17

Andrew D

968 posts

246 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
GrahamG said:
They were all GT3 spec race cars - the test session was done to establish what needs to be achieved to equalise performance


An Aston DBR9 in GT3? I saw it wipe the floor with the FIA European GT's at Silverstone in the summer, and that field included Masser MC12s and Maranellos. In fact, Modenas and 911 RSR's from the "GT2" class of the British GT Championship made up the class below, which would suggest that the DBR9 is a GT1 car.

GrahamG

1,091 posts

273 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
It was the new DBRS9 - GT3 spec -

On the equalisation point this session was specifically designed to give the FIA some baseline data - hence the use of a single driver (Christophe Bouchut) to set representative laps in all the cars present.

There are further tests due in the New Year.

toys

242 posts

265 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
havoc said:
toys said:
If Lotus can make a race Exige (based on the standard aluminium chassis) with full rollcage, extinguishers etc weigh 750 kg, then why is the road version nearly 1000 kg??

I suspect there MAY be some carbonfibre used...
;o)

Of course, feel free to specify this option for your road-car, but have your chequebook ready.


Fair point. I still can't get my head round how you can save a quarter of a tonne from the bodywork though - surely the composite body of an Elise doesn't weigh that much to start with?

>> Edited by toys on Monday 19th December 17:22

archibold

76 posts

289 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
Unfortunately unless they do something about the location of the engine (too high) then it's going to be fundamentally flawed. I'm sure that it will get closer to the pace but suspect it would be a very big ask to get up the front.

That said it should be an attractive price compared to the Aston/Lambo etc, so might be quite well supported (also the parts should be a lot cheaper).

Archibold

mx-tro

290 posts

226 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
toys said:
havoc said:
toys said:
If Lotus can make a race Exige (based on the standard aluminium chassis) with full rollcage, extinguishers etc weigh 750 kg, then why is the road version nearly 1000 kg??

I suspect there MAY be some carbonfibre used...
;o)

Of course, feel free to specify this option for your road-car, but have your chequebook ready.


Fair point. I still can't get my head round how you can save a quarter of a tonne from the bodywork though - surely the composite body of an Elise doesn't weigh that much to start with?

>> Edited by toys on Monday 19th December 17:22


Lots of other parts on the car will be either lightweight versions of (brakes, suspension, wheels, polycarbonate instead of glass etc), or removed completely (stereo, heater, airbags and so on). For example a race prepped K-series engine could lose about 25kg off a road version which weighed about 100 kgs to start. Drastic weight saving on a road car is not always feasable as the cars have to comply with safety legislation. Now if Lotus still offered self build kit versions...

mulletmark

1,181 posts

229 months

Monday 19th December 2005
quotequote all
I'm not sure that the lap times show a true representation of what this Lotus will be capable of. Don't forget it's still very much in the early stages of development for a GT3. Expect great things

beearwa

20 posts

227 months

Tuesday 20th December 2005
quotequote all
I think the major weakness for Lotus is the relative smaller power output, because once it reach very high speed, the major resistance comes from air instead of the mass of vehicle, and it will need more power to break wind resistance to reach higher speed.
If 2 vehicles have identical power to weight ratio and aerodynamic package, the heavier one will have higher top speed in straight line than lighter one. So I don't think the light weight structure really give Lotus enough advantage under this kind similar power to weight ratio rules.

BWhight

7 posts

271 months

Tuesday 20th December 2005
quotequote all
Fair point technically, but that didn't stop Gavan and I winning British GT races in 2004 in a low power, light weight Lotus. We were up against 911s, V8 Marcos, V8 Morgan, V8 ferrari etc.

My point? It really depends on the circuits. We got whooped at Silverstone GP circuit, as our top speed was about half everyone elses... but we dished out whoopings anywhere with a balance of corners and straights.

I haven't seen the circuits that will be used for FIA GT3. If they are all straights, the Lotus won't win. If they are more balanced I fancy it will do well, in the right hands.

Oh, and I don't think the cars were all running equal tyres at Paul Ricard. We all know thats the most simple way to make a car go faster/slower, except maybe changing the driver!

Barrie Whight
Cadena GTC

S Works

10,166 posts

256 months

Tuesday 20th December 2005
quotequote all
Considering it was 2 months from drawing board to first proper shakedown that's not bad at all. Once this has had some further fine tuning over the winter, the aero package is refined and we see it test in full race spec then let's see how quick it is.

So many nay-sayers... oh ye of little faith!